Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):811-818. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0880-3. Epub 2020 May 18.
Does psychopathology develop as a function of the objective or subjective experience of childhood maltreatment? To address this question, we studied a unique cohort of 1,196 children with both objective, court-documented evidence of maltreatment and subjective reports of their childhood maltreatment histories made once they reached adulthood, along with extensive psychiatric assessment. We found that, even for severe cases of childhood maltreatment identified through court records, risk of psychopathology linked to objective measures was minimal in the absence of subjective reports. In contrast, risk of psychopathology linked to subjective reports of childhood maltreatment was high, whether or not the reports were consistent with objective measures. These findings have important implications for how we study the mechanisms through which child maltreatment affects mental health and how we prevent or treat maltreatment-related psychopathology. Interventions for psychopathology associated with childhood maltreatment can benefit from deeper understanding of the subjective experience.
精神病理学是随着儿童期虐待的客观或主观经历而发展的吗?为了解决这个问题,我们研究了一个独特的队列,其中包括 1196 名儿童,他们既有客观的法庭记录证据证明虐待行为,又有成年后主观报告的童年虐待史,同时还有广泛的精神病学评估。我们发现,即使是通过法庭记录确定的严重儿童虐待案例,在没有主观报告的情况下,与客观测量相关的精神病理学风险也很小。相比之下,与主观报告的儿童虐待相关的精神病理学风险很高,无论报告是否与客观测量一致。这些发现对我们研究儿童虐待影响心理健康的机制以及我们如何预防或治疗与虐待相关的精神病理学有重要意义。与儿童虐待相关的精神病理学的干预措施可以从对主观经历的更深入理解中受益。