Suppr超能文献

主观和客观的童年逆境体验:对其一致性及其与精神病理学关系的元分析。

Subjective and objective experiences of childhood adversity: a meta-analysis of their agreement and relationships with psychopathology.

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Child Study Centre, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;64(8):1185-1199. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13803. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Researchers use both subjective self-report and objective measures, such as official records, to investigate the impact of childhood adversity on psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether subjective and objective measures of childhood adversity (a) show agreement, and (b) differentially predict psychopathology.

METHOD

To address this, we conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis to examine the agreement between subjective and objective measures of childhood adversity, and their prediction of psychopathology. We searched in PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase for articles with both subjective measures (self-reports) and objective measures of childhood adversity (comprising official records, or reports from multiple informants unrelated to the target individual), and measures of psychopathology.

RESULTS

We identified 22 studies (n = 18,163) with data on agreement between subjective and objective measures of childhood adversities, and 17 studies (n = 14,789) with data on the associations between subjective and objective measures with psychopathology. First, we found that subjective and objective measures of childhood adversities were only moderately correlated (e.g. for maltreatment, r = .32, 95% CI = 0.23-0.41). Second, subjective measures of childhood adversities were associated with psychopathology, independent of objective measures (e.g. for maltreatment, r = .16, 95% CI = 0.09-0.22). In contrast, objective measures of childhood adversities had null or minimal associations with psychopathology, independent of subjective measures (e.g. r for maltreatment = .06, 95% CI = -0.02-0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the effects of childhood adversity on psychopathology are primarily driven by a person's subjective experience. If this is the case, clinical interventions targeting memories and cognitive processes surrounding childhood adversity may reduce the risk of psychopathology in exposed individuals.

摘要

背景

研究人员使用主观自我报告和客观测量(例如官方记录)来研究童年逆境对精神病理学的影响。但是,尚不清楚主观和客观的童年逆境测量(a)是否存在一致性,以及(b)是否可以预测精神病理学。

方法

为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项预先注册的荟萃分析,以检验童年逆境的主观和客观测量之间的一致性,以及它们对精神病理学的预测。我们在 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Embase 中搜索了同时具有主观测量(自我报告)和客观测量(包括官方记录或来自与目标个体无关的多个信息源的报告)以及精神病理学测量的文章。

结果

我们确定了 22 项研究(n=18163),这些研究具有关于主观和客观童年逆境测量之间的一致性的数据,以及 17 项研究(n=14789),这些研究具有关于主观和客观测量与精神病理学之间关联的数据。首先,我们发现主观和客观的童年逆境测量仅中度相关(例如,对于虐待,r=.32,95%CI=0.23-0.41)。其次,主观的童年逆境测量与精神病理学有关,与客观测量无关(例如,对于虐待,r=.16,95%CI=0.09-0.22)。相比之下,客观的童年逆境测量与精神病理学无关或关联极小,与主观测量无关(例如,对于虐待,r=0.06,95%CI=-0.02-0.13)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,童年逆境对精神病理学的影响主要是由一个人的主观体验驱动的。如果是这样,针对围绕童年逆境的记忆和认知过程的临床干预可能会降低暴露个体患精神病理学的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ae/10617978/f4bee81d69de/JCPP-64-1185-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验