School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Virginia, Queensland, Australia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):972-981. doi: 10.1111/inm.12737. Epub 2020 May 19.
There is considerable controversy around psychiatric diagnosis generally and personality disorders specifically. Since its conception, borderline personality disorder has been controversial because of the stigma associated with the diagnosis and the therapeutic nihilism held by practitioners who encounter people with this high prevalence problem in acute settings. This paper reviews the history of the diagnosis of BPD and summarizes some of the controversy surrounding the categorical nature of diagnosis. Both the DSM 5 and ICD-11 will be discussed; however, for the purposes of this paper, the DSM 5 will take the primary focus due to greater cultural significance. Recent developments in the treatment of borderline personality disorder suggest that it is a highly treatable condition and that full clinical recovery is possible. This paper formulates an argument that despite problems with psychiatric diagnosis that are unlikely to be resolved soon, a diagnosis should be made with an accompanying formulation to enable people to receive timely and effective treatment to enable personal and clinical recovery.
精神科诊断,尤其是人格障碍的诊断,存在很大争议。自概念提出以来,边缘型人格障碍一直存在争议,因为诊断会带来污名化,而且在急性环境中遇到此类高发性问题的从业者会持治疗虚无主义态度。本文回顾了边缘型人格障碍的诊断史,并总结了围绕诊断的类别性质存在的一些争议。本文将讨论 DSM-5 和 ICD-11,但由于 DSM-5 具有更大的文化意义,因此本文将主要关注 DSM-5。边缘型人格障碍的治疗新进展表明,该病具有高度可治疗性,完全临床康复是可能的。本文提出了一个论点,即尽管精神科诊断存在问题,而且不太可能很快得到解决,但应该进行诊断,并制定相应的治疗方案,以便人们能够及时获得有效治疗,从而实现个人和临床康复。