• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《驼峰之谜:1991-2007 年挪威出生体重的离奇上升与下降》

Stumped by the Hump: The Curious Rise and Fall of Norwegian Birthweights, 1991-2007.

机构信息

From the Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2020 Jul;31(4):587-594. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001211.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001211
PMID:32427635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7269019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There was a distinct rise in mean birthweights in Norway starting in 1991 that plateaued in 1996-2002 and then declined to previous levels. We investigated whether these changes corresponded to trends in neonatal mortality or other birthweight-associated pregnancy outcomes. We also explored known predictors of birthweight and examined whether these could explain the birthweight trends.

METHODS

We calculated mean birthweight for all live births in Norway in each year from 1982 to 2016, together with annual neonatal mortality and proportion of infants born preterm, or with low Apgar score. We stratified mean birthweight over time by factors including parity, gestational age, and Scandinavian versus non-Scandinavian origin of mother, to test robustness of the pattern. In addition, we used multivariable linear regression to obtain adjusted estimates for mean birthweight per year.

RESULTS

A 50-g rise and fall of mean birthweights during a 25-year period was not accompanied by corresponding changes in neonatal mortality, preterm births, or Apgar scores. The distinct hump pattern was restricted to term births and was not apparent among infants of mothers born outside Scandinavia. We saw a similar pattern for Sweden but not Finland. Known predictors of birthweight (such as parity, mode of onset of delivery, and marital status) did not explain the hump.

CONCLUSIONS

A distinct temporal hump in mean birthweight among Norwegian term births had no obvious explanations. Furthermore, these fluctuations in birthweight were not associated indirectly with adverse outcomes in measures of infant health.

摘要

背景

自 1991 年以来,挪威的平均出生体重明显上升,在 1996-2002 年达到峰值,随后下降到之前的水平。我们调查了这些变化是否与新生儿死亡率或其他与出生体重相关的妊娠结局趋势相对应。我们还探讨了已知的出生体重预测因素,并研究了这些因素是否可以解释出生体重趋势。

方法

我们计算了 1982 年至 2016 年期间挪威每年所有活产儿的平均出生体重,以及每年的新生儿死亡率和早产儿比例,或低阿普加评分的婴儿比例。我们根据产妇的产次、胎龄、斯堪的纳维亚和非斯堪的纳维亚血统等因素对平均出生体重进行了时间分层,以检验该模式的稳健性。此外,我们使用多元线性回归获得了每年平均出生体重的调整估计值。

结果

在 25 年的时间里,平均出生体重上升了 50 克,下降了 50 克,但新生儿死亡率、早产率或阿普加评分并没有相应变化。明显的驼峰模式仅限于足月出生,在非斯堪的纳维亚血统的母亲所生的婴儿中并不明显。我们在瑞典看到了类似的模式,但在芬兰没有。出生体重的已知预测因素(如产次、分娩方式和婚姻状况)并不能解释驼峰。

结论

挪威足月出生的平均出生体重出现明显的时间驼峰,没有明显的解释。此外,这些出生体重的波动与婴儿健康指标的不良结局没有间接关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/74b5589219d4/ede-31-587-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/b6c38dc3cf25/ede-31-587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/9f3600a25ccb/ede-31-587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/55c4e5820faa/ede-31-587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/2ba5a7a0669a/ede-31-587-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/c8786869a96e/ede-31-587-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/74b5589219d4/ede-31-587-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/b6c38dc3cf25/ede-31-587-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/9f3600a25ccb/ede-31-587-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/55c4e5820faa/ede-31-587-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/2ba5a7a0669a/ede-31-587-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/c8786869a96e/ede-31-587-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/7269019/74b5589219d4/ede-31-587-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Stumped by the Hump: The Curious Rise and Fall of Norwegian Birthweights, 1991-2007.《驼峰之谜:1991-2007 年挪威出生体重的离奇上升与下降》
Epidemiology. 2020 Jul;31(4):587-594. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001211.
2
Paternal country of origin and adverse neonatal outcomes in births to foreign-born women in Norway: A population-based cohort study.挪威出生的外国女性的父国来源与不良新生儿结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 4;17(11):e1003395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003395. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Low birthweight and preterm birth: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015.低出生体重和早产:巴西佩洛塔斯四个基于人群的出生队列 1982-2015 年的趋势和不平等。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;48(Suppl 1):i46-i53. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy106.
4
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
5
Neonatal mortality risk of vulnerable newborns by fine stratum of gestational age and birthweight for 230 679 live births in nine low- and middle-income countries, 2000-2017.2000 - 2017年,九个低收入和中等收入国家230679例活产中,按胎龄和出生体重精细分层的脆弱新生儿的新生儿死亡风险。
BJOG. 2024 Jan 16. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17743.
6
Secular trends of fetal growth in Canada, 1981 to 1997.1981年至1997年加拿大胎儿生长的长期趋势。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;17(4):347-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00513.x.
7
Offspring birthweight by gestational age and parental cardiovascular mortality: a population-based cohort study.按胎龄和父母心血管死亡率划分的后代出生体重:基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):336-341. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14522. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
8
A comparison of risk assessment models for term and preterm low birthweight.足月和早产低出生体重风险评估模型的比较
Prev Med. 1992 Jan;21(1):98-109. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90009-7.
9
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
10
The heavier the better? Birthweight and perinatal mortality in different ethnic groups.越重越好?不同种族群体的出生体重与围产期死亡率
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):654-60. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.3.654.

引用本文的文献

1
Short inter-pregnancy interval and birthweight: a reappraisal based on a follow-up study of all women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during 1970-2019.短孕期间隔与出生体重:基于对 1970 年至 2019 年期间所有在挪威生育过两次单胎的女性进行随访研究的再评估。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;39(8):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01148-y. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Birthweight trends and their explanatory factors in Hungary between 1999 and 2018: an analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer registry.1999 年至 2018 年匈牙利的出生体重趋势及其解释因素:对匈牙利 Tauffer 登记处的分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 12;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01787-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Association Between Birth Weight and Adult Diseases: Evidence From a Mendelian Randomization Analysis.出生体重与成人疾病之间的因果关联:来自孟德尔随机化分析的证据。
Front Genet. 2019 Jul 10;10:618. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00618. eCollection 2019.
2
Is consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks during pregnancy associated with birth weight?怀孕期间饮用含糖软饮料与出生体重有关吗?
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Oct;13(4). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12405. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Genome-wide associations for birth weight and correlations with adult disease.
Health of singleton neonates in Switzerland through time and crises: a cross-sectional study at the population level, 2007-2022.
瑞士单胎新生儿健康状况的时间变化和危机影响:2007-2022 年基于人群的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06414-1.
4
Inferring fetal growth restriction as rare, severe, and stable over time.推断胎儿生长受限是罕见的、严重的、且随时间稳定的。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 May;38(5):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00985-7. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Stumped by the Hump: The Curious Rise and Fall of Norwegian Birthweights, 1991-2007-Erratum.被“驼峰”难住:1991 - 2007年挪威出生体重的奇特兴衰——勘误
Epidemiology. 2023 May 1;34(3):e18. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001605. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Birthweight and gestational age in the Faroe Islands: A comparison between birthweight and gestational age in the Faroe Islands and other Nordic countries.法罗群岛的出生体重和胎龄:与其他北欧国家相比,法罗群岛的出生体重和胎龄。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Apr;102(4):506-515. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14527. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Prevalence of congenital heart defects in Europe, 2008-2015: A registry-based study.欧洲先天性心脏病的患病率,2008-2015 年:一项基于登记的研究。
Birth Defects Res. 2022 Dec 1;114(20):1404-1416. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2117. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
8
Factors associated with birthweight decline in Japan (1980-2004).日本出生体重下降的相关因素(1980 - 2004年)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03819-0.
出生体重的全基因组关联及其与成人疾病的相关性。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):248-252. doi: 10.1038/nature19806. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Changes in Smoking Rates Among Pregnant Women and the General Female Population in Australia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.澳大利亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典孕妇及普通女性人群吸烟率的变化。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):282-289. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw188.
5
Associations between birth weight and colon and rectal cancer risk in adulthood.出生体重与成年期结肠癌和直肠癌风险的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;42:181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Birth weight and subsequent risk of cancer.出生体重与后续患癌风险。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;38(5):538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
7
Trends in overweight and obesity over 22 years in a large adult population: the HUNT Study, Norway.挪威特隆赫姆郡健康研究(HUNT Study):一项针对大量成年人群体开展的长达22年的超重与肥胖趋势研究
Clin Obes. 2013 Feb;3(1-2):12-20. doi: 10.1111/cob.12009. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
Possible relation between maternal consumption of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and birth weight--time trends in a population.母亲摄入添加糖和含糖饮料与出生体重之间的可能关系——人群中的时间趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 24;12:901. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-901.
9
Secular trends in the epidemiology of pre-eclampsia throughout 40 years in Norway: prevalence, risk factors and perinatal survival.挪威 40 年来子痫前期流行病学的变化趋势:患病率、危险因素和围生儿结局。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 May;26(3):190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01260.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
10
Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses.均等出生体重和早产与低出生体重:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jul;89(7):862-75. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.486827.