Den Ouden Lauren, Tiego Jeggan, Lee Rico S C, Albertella Lucy, Greenwood Lisa-Marie, Fontenelle Leonardo, Yücel Murat, Segrave Rebecca
BrainPark, The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging Facility, Monash University, Australia.
Neural Systems and Behavioural Lab, The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging Facility, Monash University, Australia.
Addict Behav. 2020 Sep;108:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106464. Epub 2020 May 12.
Compulsivity is recognized as a transdiagnostic phenotype, underlying a variety of addictive and obsessive-compulsive behaviors. However, current understanding of how it should be operationalized and the processes contributing to its development and maintenance is limited. The present study investigated if there was a relationship between the affective process Experiential Avoidance (EA), an unwillingness to tolerate negative internal experiences, and the frequency and severity of transdiagnostic compulsive behaviors. A large sample of adults (N = 469) completed online questionnaires measuring EA, psychological distress and the severity of seven obsessive-compulsive and addiction-related behaviors. Using structural equation modelling, results indicated a one-factor model of compulsivity was superior to the two-factor model (addictive- vs OCD-related behaviors). The effect of EA on compulsivity was fully mediated by psychological distress, which in turn had a strong direct effect on compulsivity. This suggests distress is a key mechanism in explaining why people with high EA are more prone to compulsive behaviors. The final model explained 41% of the variance in compulsivity, underscoring the importance of these constructs as likely risk and maintenance factors for compulsive behavior. Implications for designing effective psychological interventions for compulsivity are discussed.
强迫行为被认为是一种跨诊断的表型,是多种成瘾行为和强迫行为的基础。然而,目前对于如何对其进行操作化以及促成其发展和维持的过程的理解是有限的。本研究调查了情感过程体验性回避(EA),即不愿容忍负面内在体验,与跨诊断强迫行为的频率和严重程度之间是否存在关联。一大群成年人(N = 469)完成了在线问卷,测量EA、心理困扰以及七种强迫和成瘾相关行为的严重程度。使用结构方程模型,结果表明强迫行为的单因素模型优于双因素模型(成瘾相关行为与强迫症相关行为)。EA对强迫行为的影响完全由心理困扰介导,而心理困扰反过来又对强迫行为有强烈的直接影响。这表明困扰是解释为什么高EA的人更容易出现强迫行为的关键机制。最终模型解释了强迫行为中41%的方差,强调了这些构念作为强迫行为可能的风险和维持因素的重要性。讨论了对设计有效的强迫行为心理干预措施的启示。