Gabriele-Rivet Vanessa, Arsenault Julie, Brookes Victoria J, Fleming Peter J S, Nury Charlotte, Ward Michael P
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia.
Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, ON J2S 2M2, Canada.
Animals (Basel). 2020 May 17;10(5):865. doi: 10.3390/ani10050865.
Australia is currently free of canine rabies. Spatio-ecological knowledge about dingoes in northern Australia is currently a gap that impedes the application of disease spread models and our understanding of the potential transmission of rabies, in the event of an incursion. We therefore conducted a one-year camera trap survey to monitor a dingo population in equatorial northern Australia. The population is contiguous with remote Indigenous communities containing free-roaming dogs, which potentially interact with dingoes. Based on the camera trap data, we derived dingo density and home range size estimates using maximum-likelihood, spatially explicit, mark-resight models, described dingo movements and evaluated spatial correlation and temporal overlap in activities between dingoes and community dogs. Dingo density estimates varied from 0.135 animals/km (95% CI = 0.127-0.144) during the dry season to 0.147 animals/km (95% CI = 0.135-0.159) during the wet season. The 95% bivariate Normal home range sizes were highly variable throughout the year (7.95-29.40 km). Spatial use and daily activity patterns of dingoes and free-roaming community dogs, grouped over ~3 month periods, showed substantial temporal activity overlap and spatial correlation, highlighting the potential risk of disease transmission at the wild-domestic interface in an area of biosecurity risk in equatorial northern Australia. Our results have utility for improving preparedness against a potential rabies incursion.
澳大利亚目前没有犬类狂犬病。目前,关于澳大利亚北部野狗的空间生态学知识存在空白,这阻碍了疾病传播模型的应用以及我们对狂犬病入侵时潜在传播情况的理解。因此,我们进行了为期一年的相机陷阱调查,以监测澳大利亚北部赤道地区的野狗种群。该种群与有自由放养犬只的偏远原住民社区相邻,这些犬只可能与野狗相互作用。基于相机陷阱数据,我们使用最大似然、空间明确的标记重捕模型得出了野狗密度和家域大小估计值,描述了野狗的活动,并评估了野狗与社区犬只之间活动的空间相关性和时间重叠情况。野狗密度估计值在旱季为0.135只/平方公里(95%置信区间=0.127 - 0.144),在雨季为0.147只/平方公里(95%置信区间=0.135 - 0.159)。全年95%的双变量正态家域大小变化很大(7.95 - 29.40平方公里)。按约3个月的时间段分组,野狗和自由放养的社区犬只的空间利用和日常活动模式显示出大量的时间活动重叠和空间相关性,突出了在澳大利亚北部赤道地区生物安全风险区域的野生 - 家养界面疾病传播的潜在风险。我们的结果有助于提高对潜在狂犬病入侵的防范能力。