Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, M46, SE-141 86, Huddinge, Sweden.
Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 May 19;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02655-4.
Previous attempts to identify predictors of treatment outcomes in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have yielded inconsistent findings. One way to increase precision and clinical utility could be to use machine learning methods, which can incorporate multiple non-linear associations in prediction models.
This study used a random forests machine learning approach to test if it is possible to reliably predict remission from BDD in a sample of 88 individuals that had received internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for BDD. The random forest models were compared to traditional logistic regression analyses.
Random forests correctly identified 78% of participants as remitters or non-remitters at post-treatment. The accuracy of prediction was lower in subsequent follow-ups (68, 66 and 61% correctly classified at 3-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively). Depressive symptoms, treatment credibility, working alliance, and initial severity of BDD were among the most important predictors at the beginning of treatment. By contrast, the logistic regression models did not identify consistent and strong predictors of remission from BDD.
The results provide initial support for the clinical utility of machine learning approaches in the prediction of outcomes of patients with BDD.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02010619.
先前尝试识别躯体变形障碍(BDD)治疗结果的预测因素的研究结果不一致。一种提高精度和临床实用性的方法是使用机器学习方法,它可以在预测模型中纳入多个非线性关联。
本研究使用随机森林机器学习方法来测试在接受 BDD 的互联网认知行为疗法的 88 名个体中,是否可以可靠地预测 BDD 的缓解。将随机森林模型与传统的逻辑回归分析进行了比较。
随机森林在治疗后正确识别了 78%的缓解者和非缓解者。在随后的随访中,预测的准确性较低(分别为 3、12 和 24 个月时正确分类为 68%、66%和 61%)。抑郁症状、治疗可信度、工作联盟和 BDD 的初始严重程度是治疗开始时最重要的预测因素。相比之下,逻辑回归模型没有识别出 BDD 缓解的一致和强有力的预测因素。
结果初步支持机器学习方法在预测 BDD 患者治疗结果中的临床实用性。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02010619。