Grieder Matthias, Homan Philipp, Federspiel Andrea, Kiefer Claus, Hasler Gregor
Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 5;11:375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00375. eCollection 2020.
Sustained anxiety is a key symptom of anxiety disorders and may be associated with neural activation in the right inferior parietal lobe (rIPL), particularly under unpredictable threat. This finding suggests a moderating role of the rIPL in sustained anxiety, which we tested in the current study. We applied cathodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the rIPL as a symptom provocation method in 22 healthy participants in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, prior to two recordings of cerebral blood flow (CBF). In between, we applied a threat-of-shock paradigm with three conditions: unpredictable (U), predictable (P), or no electric shocks (N). We hypothesized increased anxiety under U, but not under P or N. Furthermore, we expected reduced CBF in the rIPL after tDCS compared to sham. As predicted, anxiety was higher in the U than the P and N conditions, and active tDCS augmented this effect. While tDCS did not alter CBF in the rIPL, it did attenuate the observed increase in brain regions that typically increase activation as a response to anxiety. These findings suggest that the rIPL moderates sustained anxiety as a gateway to brain regions crucial in anxiety. Alternatively, anodal tDCS over the left orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) may have increased anxiety through disruption of OFC-amygdala interactions.
持续性焦虑是焦虑症的关键症状,可能与右侧顶下小叶(rIPL)的神经激活有关,尤其是在不可预测的威胁下。这一发现表明rIPL在持续性焦虑中起调节作用,我们在本研究中对此进行了测试。在对22名健康参与者进行两次脑血流量(CBF)记录之前,我们在一项随机、双盲、交叉研究中,将阴极或假经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)应用于rIPL,作为一种症状激发方法。在此期间,我们应用了一种电击威胁范式,包括三种情况:不可预测(U)、可预测(P)或无电击(N)。我们假设在U情况下焦虑会增加,但在P或N情况下不会。此外,我们预计与假刺激相比,tDCS后rIPL的CBF会减少。正如预测的那样,U情况下的焦虑高于P和N情况,并且主动tDCS增强了这种效应。虽然tDCS没有改变rIPL的CBF,但它确实减弱了在通常作为对焦虑反应而增加激活的脑区中观察到的激活增加。这些发现表明,rIPL作为通向焦虑中关键脑区的门户,调节持续性焦虑。或者,左侧眶额皮质(lOFC)上的阳极tDCS可能通过破坏OFC-杏仁核相互作用而增加焦虑。