MOTION Science Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, NC.
J Athl Train. 2020 Jul 1;55(7):717-723. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-151-19.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk can be assessed from landing biomechanics. Greater hamstrings stiffness is associated with a landing-biomechanics profile consistent with less ACL loading but is difficult to assess in the clinical setting. Eccentric hamstrings strength can be easily evaluated by clinicians and may provide a surrogate measure for hamstrings stiffness.
To examine associations among eccentric hamstrings strength, hamstrings stiffness, and landing biomechanics linked to ACL injury risk.
Cross-sectional study.
Research laboratory.
A total of 34 uninjured, physically active participants (22 women, 12 men; age = 20.2 ± 1.6 years, height = 171.5 ± 9.7 cm, mass = 67.1 ± 12.7 kg).
INTERVENTION(S): We collected eccentric hamstrings strength, active hamstrings stiffness, and double- and single-legged landing biomechanics during a single session.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Bivariate associations were conducted between eccentric hamstrings strength and hamstrings stiffness, vertical ground reaction force, internal knee-extension moment, internal knee-varus moment, anterior tibial shear force, knee sagittal-plane angle at initial ground contact, peak knee-flexion angle, knee frontal-plane angle at initial ground contact, peak knee-valgus angle, and knee-flexion displacement using Pearson product moment correlations or Spearman rank-order correlations.
We observed no association between hamstrings stiffness and eccentric hamstrings strength (r = 0.029, P = .44). We also found no association between hamstrings stiffness and landing biomechanics. However, greater peak eccentric strength was associated with less vertical ground reaction force in both the double-legged (r = -0.331, P = .03) and single-legged (r = -0.418, P = .01) landing conditions and with less internal knee-varus moment in the single-legged landing condition (r = -0.326, P = .04).
Eccentric hamstrings strength was associated with less vertical ground reaction force during both landing tasks and less internal knee-varus moment during the single-legged landing but was not an acceptable clinical estimate of active hamstrings stiffness.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险可以通过着陆生物力学来评估。腘绳肌硬度增加与 ACL 负荷较小的着陆生物力学特征相关,但在临床环境中难以评估。通过临床医生可以轻松评估离心腘绳肌力量,并且它可能是腘绳肌硬度的替代测量指标。
研究离心腘绳肌力量、腘绳肌硬度与 ACL 损伤风险相关的着陆生物力学之间的关系。
横断面研究。
研究实验室。
共有 34 名未受伤、活跃的参与者(22 名女性,12 名男性;年龄=20.2±1.6 岁,身高=171.5±9.7cm,体重=67.1±12.7kg)。
我们在一次会议中收集了离心腘绳肌力量、主动腘绳肌硬度以及双腿和单腿着陆的生物力学。
使用 Pearson 积矩相关或 Spearman 等级相关,对离心腘绳肌力量和腘绳肌硬度与垂直地面反作用力、膝关节内伸力矩、膝关节内旋力矩、胫骨前剪切力、初始地面接触时膝关节矢状面角度、峰值膝关节屈曲角度、初始地面接触时膝关节额状面角度、峰值膝关节外翻角度和膝关节屈曲位移之间进行双变量关联。
我们没有发现腘绳肌硬度与离心腘绳肌力量之间存在关联(r=0.029,P=0.44)。我们也没有发现腘绳肌硬度与着陆生物力学之间存在关联。然而,更大的峰值离心强度与双腿(r=-0.331,P=0.03)和单腿(r=-0.418,P=0.01)着陆条件下的垂直地面反作用力较小以及单腿着陆条件下的膝关节内旋力矩较小(r=-0.326,P=0.04)相关。
在双腿和单腿着陆任务中,离心腘绳肌力量与较小的垂直地面反作用力以及单腿着陆时较小的膝关节内旋力矩相关,但不能作为主动腘绳肌硬度的可接受临床估计。