Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Athl Train. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):764-72. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.01.
Greater hamstrings stiffness is associated with less anterior tibial translation during controlled perturbations. However, it is unclear how hamstrings stiffness influences anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) loading mechanisms during dynamic tasks.
To evaluate the influence of hamstrings stiffness on landing biomechanics related to ACL injury.
Cross-sectional study.
Research laboratory.
A total of 36 healthy, physically active volunteers (18 men, 18 women; age = 23 ± 3 years, height = 1.8 ± 0.1 m, mass = 73.1 ± 16.6 kg).
INTERVENTION(S): Hamstrings stiffness was quantified via the damped oscillatory technique. Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were captured during a double-legged jump-landing task via a 3-dimensional motion-capture system interfaced with a force plate. Landing biomechanics were compared between groups displaying high and low hamstrings stiffness via independent-samples t tests.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hamstrings stiffness was normalized to body mass (N/m·kg(-1)). Peak knee-flexion and -valgus angles, vertical and posterior ground reaction forces, anterior tibial shear force, internal knee-extension and -varus moments, and knee-flexion angles at the instants of each peak kinetic variable were identified during the landing task. Forces were normalized to body weight, whereas moments were normalized to the product of weight and height.
Internal knee-varus moment was 3.6 times smaller in the high-stiffness group (t22 = 2.221, P = .02). A trend in the data also indicated that peak anterior tibial shear force was 1.1 times smaller in the high-stiffness group (t22 = 1.537, P = .07). The high-stiffness group also demonstrated greater knee flexion at the instants of peak anterior tibial shear force and internal knee-extension and -varus moments (t22 range = 1.729-2.224, P < .05).
Greater hamstrings stiffness was associated with landing biomechanics consistent with less ACL loading and injury risk. Musculotendinous stiffness is a modifiable characteristic; thus exercises that enhance hamstrings stiffness may be important additions to ACL injury-prevention programs.
在受控干扰下,腘绳肌硬度较大与胫骨前位移较小相关。然而,在动态任务中,腘绳肌硬度如何影响前交叉韧带(ACL)的加载机制尚不清楚。
评估腘绳肌硬度对与 ACL 损伤相关的着陆生物力学的影响。
横断面研究。
研究实验室。
共有 36 名健康、活跃的志愿者(18 名男性,18 名女性;年龄=23±3 岁,身高=1.8±0.1 m,体重=73.1±16.6 kg)。
通过阻尼振荡技术量化腘绳肌硬度。通过三维运动捕捉系统与力板接口,在双腿跳跃着陆任务中捕获下肢的三维运动学和动力学。通过独立样本 t 检验比较显示高和低腘绳肌硬度的组之间的着陆生物力学。
将腘绳肌硬度归一化为体重(N/m·kg(-1))。在着陆任务中,确定峰值膝关节屈曲和外翻角度、垂直和后向地面反作用力、胫骨前剪切力、膝关节内伸和内翻力矩以及每个峰值动力学变量的膝关节屈曲角度。力被归一化为体重,而力矩被归一化为体重和高度的乘积。
高硬度组的膝关节内翻力矩小 3.6 倍(t22=2.221,P=0.02)。数据也表明,高硬度组的峰值胫骨前剪切力小 1.1 倍(t22=1.537,P=0.07)。高硬度组在峰值胫骨前剪切力和膝关节内伸和内翻力矩的瞬间还表现出更大的膝关节屈曲(t22 范围=1.729-2.224,P<0.05)。
更大的腘绳肌硬度与 ACL 加载和受伤风险较低的着陆生物力学相关。肌腱硬度是一个可调节的特征;因此,增强腘绳肌硬度的运动可能是 ACL 损伤预防计划的重要补充。