Lucero Julie, Wallerstein Nina, Duran Bonnie, Alegria Margarita, Greene-Moton Ella, Israel Barbara, Kastelic Sarah, Magarati Maya, Oetzel John, Pearson Cynthia, Schulz Amy, Villegas Malia, White Hat Emily R
University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J Mix Methods Res. 2018 Jan;12(1):55-74. doi: 10.1177/1558689816633309. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
This article describes a mixed methods study of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership practices and the links between these practices and changes in health status and disparities outcomes. Directed by a CBPR conceptual model and grounded in indigenous-transformative theory, our nation-wide, cross-site study showcases the value of a mixed methods approach for better understanding the complexity of CBPR partnerships across diverse community and research contexts. The article then provides examples of how an iterative, integrated approach to our mixed methods analysis yielded enriched understandings of two key constructs of the model: trust and governance. Implications and lessons learned while using mixed methods to study CBPR are provided.
本文描述了一项关于基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）伙伴关系实践以及这些实践与健康状况变化和差异结果之间联系的混合方法研究。在CBPR概念模型的指导下，并以本土变革理论为基础，我们的全国性跨地点研究展示了混合方法对于更好地理解不同社区和研究背景下CBPR伙伴关系复杂性的价值。文章接着举例说明了我们对混合方法分析采用迭代、综合方法如何深化了对该模型两个关键结构的理解：信任和治理。同时还介绍了在使用混合方法研究CBPR时的启示和经验教训。
