• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Epilepsy: Experiences of Participants with Cognitive Deficits.癫痫中的迷走神经刺激:认知缺陷参与者的经历
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 May 8;16:1181-1188. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S241716. eCollection 2020.
2
The vagal nerve stimulation outcome, and laryngeal effect: Otolaryngologists roles and perspective.迷走神经刺激的结果及喉部效应:耳鼻喉科医生的作用与观点。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul-Aug;38(4):408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (t-VNS) and epilepsy: A systematic review of the literature.经皮迷走神经刺激(t-VNS)与癫痫:文献系统综述。
Seizure. 2021 Oct;91:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Vagus nerve stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study.迷走神经刺激治疗药物难治性癫痫:一项长期随访研究。
Seizure. 2007 Oct;16(7):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 May 31.
5
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
6
Predicting success of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) from EEG symmetry.从脑电图对称性预测迷走神经刺激(VNS)的成功率。
Seizure. 2017 May;48:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫儿童的疗效:土耳其三级转诊中心的实践经验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
8
Therapeutic effects of children with refractory epilepsy after vagus nerve stimulation in Taiwan.台湾地区迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童耐药性癫痫的疗效。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2020 Dec;61(6):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
An interictal EEG can predict the outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy for children with intractable epilepsy.发作间期脑电图可预测难治性癫痫患儿迷走神经刺激疗法的疗效。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Jan;33(1):145-151. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3261-5. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Pre-ictal heart rate variability alterations in focal onset seizures and response to vagus nerve stimulation.发作前期局灶性起始性癫痫的心率变异性改变和迷走神经刺激的反应。
Seizure. 2021 Mar;86:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Efficacy and Quality-of-Life Changes After Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Adult Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗成年耐药性癫痫患者后的长期疗效及生活质量变化
J Clin Neurol. 2025 Mar;21(2):113-122. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2024.0218.
2
Investigating the Impact of Epilepsy on Cognitive Function: A Narrative Review.探究癫痫对认知功能的影响:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):e41223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41223. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy update.迷走神经刺激(VNS)疗法的最新进展。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88S:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Prevalence and patterns of anti-epileptic medication prescribing in the treatment of epilepsy in older adults with intellectual disabilities.老年智力障碍癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗的流行情况和模式。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Mar;62(3):245-261. doi: 10.1111/jir.12461. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Vagus Nerve Stimulation in children: A focus on intellectual disability.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 May;21(3):427-440. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
4
Managing anti-epileptic drug treatment in adult patients with intellectual disability: a serious conundrum.管理成年智障患者的抗癫痫药物治疗:一个严峻的难题。
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Jul;23(7):1152-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.13016. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
5
Complications and safety of vagus nerve stimulation: 25 years of experience at a single center.迷走神经刺激术的并发症与安全性:单一中心25年的经验
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Jul;18(1):97-104. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15534. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
6
Long-term Expectations of Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Look at Battery Replacement and Revision Surgery.迷走神经刺激的长期预期:电池更换与翻修手术探讨
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan;78(1):42-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000985.
7
Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research.患者报告的结局:临床研究的新时代。
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):137-44. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.86879.
8
Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy among patient subgroups: a re-analysis using the Engel classification.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫患者亚组的疗效:基于恩格尔分类的再分析。
Seizure. 2011 May;20(4):331-5. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in adolescents and adults with refractory epilepsy and learning disabilities.长期应用迷走神经刺激治疗青少年和成人耐药性癫痫伴学习障碍的疗效和耐受性。
Seizure. 2011 Jan;20(1):34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
10
Consensus guidelines into the management of epilepsy in adults with an intellectual disability.成人伴智力障碍癫痫管理共识指南。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Aug;53(8):687-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01182.x. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

癫痫中的迷走神经刺激:认知缺陷参与者的经历

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Epilepsy: Experiences of Participants with Cognitive Deficits.

作者信息

Pipan Eva, Apostolou Alexandros, Bograkou Maria, Brooks Petra, Vigren Patrick, Gauffin Helena

机构信息

University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Neurology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 May 8;16:1181-1188. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S241716. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S241716
PMID:32440133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7217302/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) with a special interest in patients with cognitive deficit (CD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open, retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, who were treated with VNS for at least 10 months. Based on the inability to live independently, they were divided into two groups: patients with cognitive deficit (CD group) and patients without cognitive deficit (non-CD group). A specially designed questionnaire was used for semi-structured interviews about patients' experiences of VNS treatment.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third described a continuous reduction of seizure frequency of 50% or more and were regarded as responders. Fewer subjects in the CD group were responders than in the non-CD group. Approximately one-third of all subjects had no positive effect of VNS treatment. More CD patients described additional improvements and the most common were milder seizures and improved alertness. The most commonly reported adverse effect was hoarseness.

DISCUSSION

VNS treatment in patients without CD had better effect on seizure frequency reduction than in patients with CD, but many patients with CD reported other benefits from the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-CD patients had higher seizure frequency reduction than CD patients during VNS treatment, but many CD patients described other benefits.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在调查患者接受迷走神经刺激(VNS)治疗的体验,尤其关注认知缺陷(CD)患者的体验。

材料与方法

对82例药物难治性癫痫患者进行了一项开放性回顾性研究,这些患者接受VNS治疗至少10个月。根据是否能够独立生活,将他们分为两组:认知缺陷患者(CD组)和无认知缺陷患者(非CD组)。使用一份专门设计的问卷对患者进行关于VNS治疗体验的半结构化访谈。

结果

约三分之一的患者称癫痫发作频率持续降低50%或更多,被视为治疗有效者。CD组中治疗有效的患者比非CD组少。所有受试者中约三分之一的人VNS治疗没有产生积极效果。更多的CD患者描述了其他改善情况,最常见的是发作减轻和警觉性提高。最常报告的不良反应是声音嘶哑。

讨论

无CD患者接受VNS治疗在降低癫痫发作频率方面比CD患者效果更好,但许多CD患者报告称该治疗有其他益处。

结论

VNS治疗期间,非CD患者癫痫发作频率降低程度高于CD患者,但许多CD患者描述了其他益处。