Suppr超能文献

毒性测试正在不断发展!

Toxicity testing is evolving!

作者信息

Fischer Ida, Milton Catherine, Wallace Heather

机构信息

Institution of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.

出版信息

Toxicol Res (Camb). 2020 Apr 24;9(2):67-80. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa011. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

The efficient management of the continuously increasing number of chemical substances used in today's society is assuming greater importance than ever before. Toxicity testing plays a key role in the regulatory decisions of agencies and governments that aim to protect the public and the environment from the potentially harmful or adverse effects of these multitudinous chemicals. Therefore, there is a critical need for reliable toxicity-testing methods to identify, assess and interpret the hazardous properties of any substance. Traditionally, toxicity-testing approaches have been based on studies in experimental animals. However, in the last 20 years, there has been increasing concern regarding the sustainability of these methodologies. This has created a real need for the development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) that satisfy the regulatory requirements and are acceptable and affordable to society. Numerous initiatives have been launched worldwide in attempts to address this critical need. However, although the science to support this is now available, the legislation and the pace of NAMs acceptance is lagging behind. This review will consider some of the various initiatives in Europe to identify NAMs to replace or refine the current toxicity-testing methods for pharmaceuticals. This paper also presents a novel systematic approach to support the desired toxicity-testing methodologies that the 21st century deserves.

摘要

有效管理当今社会中不断增加的化学物质数量,正变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。毒性测试在各机构和政府的监管决策中发挥着关键作用,这些决策旨在保护公众和环境免受这些众多化学品潜在的有害或不利影响。因此,迫切需要可靠的毒性测试方法来识别、评估和解释任何物质的危险特性。传统上,毒性测试方法一直基于对实验动物的研究。然而,在过去20年里,人们对这些方法的可持续性越来越担忧。这就产生了对开发新方法(NAMs)的实际需求,这些新方法要满足监管要求,并且为社会所接受且成本合理。全球范围内已经发起了许多倡议,试图满足这一迫切需求。然而,尽管现在已经有了支持这一需求的科学依据,但相关立法以及新方法被接受的速度却滞后了。本综述将探讨欧洲为识别新方法以取代或改进当前药品毒性测试方法而开展的一些不同倡议。本文还提出了一种新颖的系统方法,以支持21世纪应有的理想毒性测试方法。

相似文献

1
Toxicity testing is evolving!毒性测试正在不断发展!
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2020 Apr 24;9(2):67-80. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa011. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment.加速化学风险评估步伐。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2018 May 21;31(5):287-290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00339. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials for Aflatoxin Mitigation: A Review.用于减轻黄曲霉毒素的绿色合成纳米材料:综述
Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2025 May 7;18:211-223. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S520121. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Trends in clinical success rates and therapeutic focus.临床成功率及治疗重点的趋势
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jul;18(7):495-496. doi: 10.1038/d41573-019-00074-z.
8
In silico cancer research towards 3R.计算机辅助癌症研究的 3R 原则。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4302-0.
9
Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment.综合测试与评估方法。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Sep;123 Suppl 5:51-55. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13018. Epub 2018 May 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验