• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂的人群发生生殖器感染的危险因素及其对停药的影响。

Risk factors for genital infections in people initiating SGLT2 inhibitors and their impact on discontinuation.

作者信息

McGovern Andrew P, Hogg Michael, Shields Beverley M, Sattar Naveed A, Holman Rury R, Pearson Ewan R, Hattersley Andrew T, Jones Angus G, Dennis John M

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK

University of Exeter Medical School, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001238.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001238
PMID:32448787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7252998/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To identify risk factors, absolute risk, and impact on treatment discontinuation of genital infections with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed the relationship between baseline characteristics and genital infection in 21 004 people with type 2 diabetes initiating SGLT2i and 55 471 controls initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in a UK primary care database. We assessed absolute risk of infection in those with key risk factors and the association between early genital infection and treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Genital infection was substantially more common in those treated with SGLT2i (8.1% within 1 year) than DPP4i (1.8%). Key predictors of infection with SGLT2i were female sex (HR 3.64; 95% CI 3.23 to 4.11) and history of genital infection; <1 year before initiation (HR 4.38; 3.73 to 5.13), 1-5 years (HR 3.04; 2.64 to 3.51), and >5 years (HR 1.79; 1.55 to 2.07). Baseline HbA was not associated with infection risk for SGLT2i, in contrast to DPP4i where risk increased with higher HbA. One-year absolute risk of genital infection with SGLT2i was highest for those with a history of prior infection (females 23.7%, males 12.1%), compared with those without (females 10.8%, males 2.7%). Early genital infection was associated with a similar discontinuation risk for SGLT2i (HR 1.48; 1.21-1.80) and DPP4i (HR 1.58; 1.21-2.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex and history of prior infection are simple features that can identify subgroups at greatly increased risk of genital infections with SGLT2i therapy. These data can be used to risk-stratify patients. High HbA is not a risk factor for genital infections with SGLT2i.

摘要

引言

确定钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)治疗生殖器感染的危险因素、绝对风险以及对治疗中断的影响。

研究设计与方法

在英国初级医疗数据库中,我们评估了21004例开始使用SGLT2i的2型糖尿病患者和55471例开始使用二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)的对照者的基线特征与生殖器感染之间的关系。我们评估了具有关键危险因素者的感染绝对风险以及早期生殖器感染与治疗中断之间的关联。

结果

使用SGLT2i治疗的患者中生殖器感染(1年内发生率8.1%)比使用DPP4i治疗的患者(1.8%)更为常见。SGLT2i治疗感染的关键预测因素为女性(HR 3.64;95%CI 3.23至4.11)和生殖器感染史;开始治疗前<1年(HR 4.38;3.73至5.13)、1 - 5年(HR 3.04;2.64至3.51)以及>5年(HR 1.79;1.55至2.07)。与DPP4i不同,DPP4i的感染风险随糖化血红蛋白(HbA)升高而增加,而SGLT2i治疗的基线HbA与感染风险无关。与无生殖器感染史者相比(女性10.8%,男性2.7%),有生殖器感染史者使用SGLT2i治疗1年的生殖器感染绝对风险最高(女性23.7%,男性12.1%)。早期生殖器感染与SGLT2i(HR 1.48;1.21 - 1.80)和DPP4i(HR 1.58;1.21 - 2.07)的治疗中断风险相似。

结论

女性和既往感染史是可识别SGLT2i治疗生殖器感染风险大幅增加亚组的简单特征。这些数据可用于对患者进行风险分层。高HbA不是SGLT2i治疗生殖器感染的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/d17c0abe74d7/bmjdrc-2020-001238f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/2a9464b91aab/bmjdrc-2020-001238f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/3453f636c1d9/bmjdrc-2020-001238f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/d17c0abe74d7/bmjdrc-2020-001238f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/2a9464b91aab/bmjdrc-2020-001238f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/3453f636c1d9/bmjdrc-2020-001238f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1011/7252998/d17c0abe74d7/bmjdrc-2020-001238f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for genital infections in people initiating SGLT2 inhibitors and their impact on discontinuation.开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂的人群发生生殖器感染的危险因素及其对停药的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001238.
2
Safety and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a UK population with type 2 diabetes and aged over 70 years: an instrumental variable approach.SGLT2 抑制剂在英国 2 型糖尿病且年龄超过 70 岁人群中的安全性和有效性:一种工具变量法。
Diabetologia. 2024 Sep;67(9):1817-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06190-9. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Comparing Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Baseline HbA1c Levels.比较 SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂在基线 HbA1c 水平不同的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Mar 1;183(3):242-254. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6664.
4
Lower Risks of New-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors.与 DPP4 抑制剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的新发肝细胞癌风险较低。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Jun;22(2 D). doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118.
5
The risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a nationwide cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者新发心房颤动的风险:一项全国性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Jun 28;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01549-x.
6
New-onset syncope in diabetic patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a Chinese population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗的糖尿病患者新发晕厥:一项基于中国人群的队列研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Feb 23;10(2):103-117. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad086.
7
Cardiometabolic risk reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly treated with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: A real-world administrative database study in Japan.在日本真实世界行政数据库研究中,新接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者与接受二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗的患者的心血代谢风险降低情况。
J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Mar;14(3):404-416. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13952. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
The Effect of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Hemoglobin A1c Variability and Acute Kidney Injury: A Causal Mediation Analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对糖化血红蛋白变异性和急性肾损伤的影响:因果中介分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;33(8):e5876. doi: 10.1002/pds.5876.
9
Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.SGLT2 和 DPP4 抑制剂联合治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2018 Nov;44(5):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂用于心血管疾病患者:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD013650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013650.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of genitourinary tract infections with SGLT-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and disproportionality analysis using FAERS.2型糖尿病患者使用SGLT-2抑制剂发生泌尿生殖道感染的风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析及使用FDA不良事件报告系统的不成比例性分析
Endocrine. 2025 Aug 24. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04393-7.
2
Urinary incontinence in US adults aged ≥55 years with type 2 diabetes and indications for SGLT2is: NHANES 2013-2020.美国≥55岁2型糖尿病成年人中尿失禁及钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的适应证:2013 - 2020年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Jul 31;13(4):e004929. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-004929.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in an Italian Cohort of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.长期有效性和安全性的 SGLT-2 抑制剂在意大利队列研究的患者 2 型糖尿病。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 4;2019:3971060. doi: 10.1155/2019/3971060. eCollection 2019.
2
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.达格列净治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of genital mycotic and urinary tract infection: A population-based study of older women and men with diabetes.
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors use and the risks of genital and urinary tract infection: What should we know?
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的使用与生殖道和泌尿道感染风险:我们应该了解什么?
Tzu Chi Med J. 2025 Apr 4;37(3):255-263. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_275_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
Long-term effects of metformin versus sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.二甲双胍与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者心血管结局的长期影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4267-4277. doi: 10.62347/YNWL3428. eCollection 2025.
5
Prevalence of SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP1 receptor agonist prescriptions in type 2 diabetes patients with and without chronic kidney disease: Analysis of an Australian primary care dataset.2型糖尿病合并和不合并慢性肾脏病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂处方的患病率:澳大利亚初级保健数据集分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1111/dom.16608.
6
Evaluating prediction of short-term tolerability of five type 2 diabetes drug classes using routine clinical features: UK population-based study.利用常规临床特征评估五类2型糖尿病药物的短期耐受性预测:基于英国人群的研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4320-4329. doi: 10.1111/dom.16470. Epub 2025 May 16.
7
The Role of SGLT2-Inhibitors Across All Stages of Heart Failure and Mechanisms of Early Clinical Benefit: From Prevention to Advanced Heart Failure.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在心力衰竭各阶段的作用及早期临床获益机制:从预防到晚期心力衰竭
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 3;13(3):608. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030608.
8
SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Urogenital Infections: A Concise Review.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与泌尿生殖系统感染风险:简要综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1960. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061960.
9
Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Urinary Tract Infections in Clinical Practice-A Cross-Sectional Study.临床实践中SGLT2抑制剂的安全性与尿路感染——一项横断面研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 1;60(12):1974. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121974.
10
In-hospital initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭患者住院期间启动钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Jan;30(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10446-2. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与女性和男性糖尿病患者生殖器真菌感染和尿路感染风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2394-2404. doi: 10.1111/dom.13820. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
4
SGLT Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes: Proceed With Extreme Caution.1型糖尿病使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制剂:务必极度谨慎。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jun;42(6):991-993. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0008.
5
A review of the mechanism of action, metabolic profile and haemodynamic effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂作用机制、代谢特征和血液动力学效应的综述。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21 Suppl 2:9-18. doi: 10.1111/dom.13650.
6
Time trends in prescribing of type 2 diabetes drugs, glycaemic response and risk factors: A retrospective analysis of primary care data, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年,基层医疗数据中 2 型糖尿病药物处方、血糖反应和风险因素的时间趋势:回顾性分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1576-1584. doi: 10.1111/dom.13687. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
7
Different patterns of second-line treatment in type 2 diabetes after metformin monotherapy in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (D360 Nordic): A multinational observational study.丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典二甲双胍单药治疗后2型糖尿病二线治疗的不同模式(D360北欧研究):一项多国观察性研究
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018 Aug 31;1(4):e00036. doi: 10.1002/edm2.36. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Evaluating associations between the benefits and risks of drug therapy in type 2 diabetes: a joint modeling approach.评估2型糖尿病药物治疗的获益与风险之间的关联:一种联合建模方法。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 14;10:1869-1877. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179555. eCollection 2018.
9
Types of yeasts that cause vulvovaginal candidiasis in chronic users of corticosteroids.慢性使用皮质类固醇的患者中引起外阴阴道念珠菌病的酵母类型。
Med Mycol. 2019 Aug 1;57(6):681-687. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy117.
10
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.达格列净与 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389. Epub 2018 Nov 10.