Suppr超能文献

单独使用 TNFR2 阻断剂或与 PD-1 阻断剂联合使用在小鼠癌症模型中显示出治疗效果。

TNFR2 blockade alone or in combination with PD-1 blockade shows therapeutic efficacy in murine cancer models.

机构信息

Immunobiology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Leukoc Biol. 2020 Jun;107(6):981-991. doi: 10.1002/JLB.5MA0420-375RRRRR. Epub 2020 May 24.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are profoundly transforming cancer therapy, but response rates vary widely. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed death receptor-1 (anti-PD-1), might be increased by combination therapies. TNFR2 has emerged as a new target due to its massive expression on highly immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the microenvironment and on certain tumor cells. In murine colon cancer models CT26 and MC38, we evaluated the efficacy of a new anti-TNFR2 antibody alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with placebo, anti-PD-1 alone, anti-TNFR2 alone, or combination anti-PD-1 and anti-TNFR2. We found that combination therapy had the greatest efficacy by complete tumor regression and elimination (cure) in 65-70% of animals. The next most effective therapy was anti-TNFR2 alone (20-50% cured), whereas the least effective was anti-PD-1 alone (10-25% cured). The mode of action, according to in vivo and in vitro methods including FACS analysis, was by killing immunosuppressive Tregs in the tumor microenvironment and increasing the ratio of CD8+ T effectors (Teffs) to Tregs. We also found that sequence of antibody delivery altered outcome. The two most effective sequences were simultaneous delivery (70% cured) followed by anti-TNFR2 preceding anti-PD-1 (40% cured), and the least effective was by anti-PD-1 preceding anti-TNFR2 (10% cured). We conclude that anti-PD-1 is best enhanced by simultaneous administration with anti-TNFR2, and anti-TNFR2 alone may be potentially useful strategy for those do not respond to, or cannot tolerate, anti-PD-1 or other checkpoint inhibitors.

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂正在彻底改变癌症治疗方法,但反应率差异很大。由于其在微环境中高度免疫抑制性调节性 T 细胞 (Tregs) 上以及某些肿瘤细胞上的大量表达,检查点抑制剂(如抗程序性死亡受体 1(抗 PD-1))的疗效可以通过联合治疗来提高。TNFR2 已成为一个新的靶点,因为它在肿瘤微环境中高度表达在高度免疫抑制性调节性 T 细胞 (Tregs) 上,以及某些肿瘤细胞上。在小鼠结肠癌模型 CT26 和 MC38 中,我们评估了单独使用新型抗 TNFR2 抗体或与抗 PD-1 治疗联合使用的疗效。荷瘤小鼠接受安慰剂、单独使用抗 PD-1、单独使用抗 TNFR2 或联合使用抗 PD-1 和抗 TNFR2 治疗。我们发现联合治疗的疗效最大,65-70%的动物完全消退肿瘤并消除(治愈)。其次最有效的治疗是单独使用抗 TNFR2(20-50%治愈),而单独使用抗 PD-1 效果最差(10-25%治愈)。根据体内和体外方法(包括 FACS 分析),作用模式是通过杀死肿瘤微环境中的免疫抑制性 Tregs 并增加 CD8+ T 效应器 (Teffs) 与 Tregs 的比值。我们还发现抗体给药顺序改变了结果。两种最有效的给药顺序是同时给药(70%治愈),然后是抗 TNFR2 先于抗 PD-1(40%治愈),而最无效的是抗 PD-1 先于抗 TNFR2(10%治愈)。我们得出结论,抗 PD-1 最好通过与抗 TNFR2 同时给药来增强,单独使用抗 TNFR2 可能是对那些对抗 PD-1 或其他检查点抑制剂无反应或无法耐受的患者的潜在有用策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验