• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于铁路事故上下文本体的风险相关性推理研究。

A Study of Risk Relevance Reasoning Based on a Context Ontology of Railway Accidents.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.

ShuoHuang Railway Development Co. Ltd., Cangzhou, China.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1589-1611. doi: 10.1111/risa.13506. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13506
PMID:32449998
Abstract

With the application of risk management and accident response in the railway domain, risk detection and prevention have become key research topics. Many dangers and associated risk sources must be considered in collaborative scenarios of heavy-haul railways. In these scenarios, (1) various risk sources are involved in different data sources, and context affects their occurrence, (2) the relationships between contexts and risk sources in the accident cause mechanism need to be explicitly defined, and (3) risk knowledge reasoning needs to integrate knowledge from multiple data sources to achieve comprehensive results. To express the association rules among core concepts, this article constructs two ontologies: The accident-risk ontology and the context ontology. Concept analysis is based on railway domain knowledge and accident analysis reports. To sustainably integrate knowledge, an integrated evolutionary model called scenario-risk-accident chain ontology (SRAC) is constructed by introducing new data sources. The SRAC is integrated through expert rules between the two ontologies, and its evolution process involves new knowledge through a new risk source database. After three versions of the upgrade process, potential risk sources can be mined and evaluated in specific contexts. To evaluate the risk source level, a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network model is used to capture context and risk text features. A model comparison for different neural network structures is performed to find the optimal evaluation results. Finally, new concepts, such as risk source level, and new instances are updated in the context-aware risk knowledge reasoning framework.

摘要

在铁路领域应用风险管理和事故应对时,风险检测和预防已成为关键研究课题。重载铁路的协作场景中必须考虑许多危险和相关的风险源。在这些场景中,(1) 各种风险源涉及不同的数据源,上下文会影响它们的发生;(2) 需要明确定义事故因果机制中上下文和风险源之间的关系;(3) 风险知识推理需要整合来自多个数据源的知识,以实现全面的结果。为了表达核心概念之间的关联规则,本文构建了两个本体:事故风险本体和上下文本体。概念分析基于铁路领域知识和事故分析报告。为了可持续地整合知识,通过引入新的数据源构建了名为情景风险事故链本体 (SRAC) 的综合进化模型。通过两个本体之间的专家规则进行集成,其进化过程通过新的风险源数据库引入新的知识。经过三个版本的升级过程,可以在特定上下文中挖掘和评估潜在风险源。为了评估风险源级别,使用长短期记忆 (LSTM) 神经网络模型来捕获上下文和风险文本特征。针对不同神经网络结构进行模型比较,以找到最佳的评估结果。最后,在上下文感知风险知识推理框架中更新新的概念,如风险源级别和新实例。

相似文献

1
A Study of Risk Relevance Reasoning Based on a Context Ontology of Railway Accidents.基于铁路事故上下文本体的风险相关性推理研究。
Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1589-1611. doi: 10.1111/risa.13506. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Railway accident prediction strategy based on ensemble learning.基于集成学习的铁路事故预测策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Oct;176:106817. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106817. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
A hybrid human and organisational analysis method for railway accidents based on STAMP-HFACS and human information processing.基于 STAMP-HFACS 和人类信息处理的铁路事故混合人因分析方法
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:122-142. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
4
A socio-technical systems approach of the accident analysis in Indonesian multiple train accident cases: An application of AcciMap methodology.
J Emerg Manag. 2024 Mar-Apr;22(2):155-167. doi: 10.5055/jem.0830.
5
Safety at work for railway staff in Britain.英国铁路员工的工作安全。
J Soc Occup Med. 1990 Winter;40(4):130-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/40.4.130.
6
A statistical study of railway safety in China and Japan 1990-2020.中国和日本 1990-2020 年铁路安全的统计研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;175:106764. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106764. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
[Epidemiological features and causes of railway traffic accidents].[铁路交通事故的流行病学特征及成因]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1991 Jan;25(1):26-9.
8
Railway accident causation analysis: Current approaches, challenges and potential solutions.铁路事故致因分析:当前方法、挑战与潜在解决方案。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jun;186:107049. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107049. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
9
Traffic accident detection and condition analysis based on social networking data.基于社交网络数据的交通事故检测与状态分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105973. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105973. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
Railway Traffic Emergency Management Relying on Image Recognition Technology in the Context of Big Data.基于大数据的图像识别技术在铁路交通应急管理中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jun 30;2022:1920196. doi: 10.1155/2022/1920196. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel textual track-data-based approach for estimating individual infection risk of COVID-19.一种基于新型文本轨迹数据的 COVID-19 个体感染风险估计方法。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jan;43(1):156-182. doi: 10.1111/risa.13944. Epub 2022 May 14.
2
Causality-Network-Based Critical Hazard Identification for Railway Accident Prevention: Complex Network-Based Model Development and Comparison.基于因果网络的铁路事故预防关键危险识别:基于复杂网络的模型开发与比较
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;23(7):864. doi: 10.3390/e23070864.