Suppr超能文献

农村地区医疗急救体系转运时间对途中临床恶化的影响。

The effect of emergency medical system transport time on in route clinical decline in a rural system.

机构信息

From the Department of General Surgery (T.R.K., M.J.B., D.L.D., A.C.B.), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):734-741. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002675.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergency medical system (EMS) Field Triage Decision Scheme (FTDS) exists to direct certain injured patients to high-level care facilities. In rural states, this may require long transport durations, with uncertainty about the effects on clinical decline. We investigate adherence to the FTDS and the effect of transport duration on clinical decline in helicopter emergency medical system (HEMS) and ground emergency medical system (GEMS) transport in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

METHODS

This institutional review board-approved study retrospectively analyzed deidentified data from the 2017 National EMS Information System for Kentucky. Patients were classified using step 1 FTDS criteria (respiratory rate [RR], <10 or >29 breaths per minute; systolic blood pressure (SBP), <90 mm Hg; or Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, <14 points), by mode of transport (HEMS or GEMS), and by arrival at an appropriate center (levels I-III trauma center). Clinical decline was defined in both groups as an in route decrease in GCS of 2 points or greater, a SBP decrease of 1 SD or greater into or within the low range, an RR increase of 1 SD or greater into or within the high range, or an RR decrease of 1 SD or greater into or within the low range.

RESULTS

Almost half (46.3%) of step 1 patients were transported to an inappropriate center; the most common reason recorded was "closest facility" (57.8%). The percent of step 1 patients who declined in route increased with prehospital time in both HEMS and GEMS (p < 0.001). Overall, 12.2% of step 1 patients declined during transport, most commonly because of decreasing GCS (median change, -5 points; interquartile range, -3 to -9, in GCS declining patients). Helicopter EMS patients were more likely to meet step 1 criteria at the scene (29.9% vs. 5.8% GEMS, p < 0.001) and to decline (27.8% vs. 6.1% GEMS, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that, in a rural state, injured patients meeting FTDS step 1 criteria reach levels I to III trauma centers only about half the time. The FTDS step 1 criteria identified patients at higher risk of further prehospital clinical decline. Rather than decline after 1 hour, these data show that an increasing proportion of patients experience clinical decline throughout prehospital transport.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

摘要

背景

紧急医疗系统(EMS)现场分诊决策方案(FTDS)旨在将某些受伤患者分诊至高级护理机构。在农村州,这可能需要较长的运输时间,并对临床恶化的影响存在不确定性。我们调查了在肯塔基州的直升机紧急医疗系统(HEMS)和地面紧急医疗系统(GEMS)转运中,对 FTDS 的依从性以及转运时间对临床恶化的影响。

方法

这项经过机构审查委员会批准的研究回顾性地分析了来自 2017 年肯塔基州国家紧急医疗服务信息系统的去识别数据。患者根据 FTDS 第 1 步标准(呼吸频率[RR],<10 或>29 次/分钟;收缩压[SBP],<90mmHg;或格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS],<14 分),通过转运模式(HEMS 或 GEMS)和到达合适中心(I-III 级创伤中心)进行分类。在两组中,临床恶化均定义为在途中 GCS 下降 2 分或以上,SBP 下降 1 个标准差或更大进入或处于低值范围,RR 增加 1 个标准差或更大进入或处于高值范围,或 RR 下降 1 个标准差或更大进入或处于低值范围。

结果

近一半(46.3%)的第 1 步患者被转运至不适当的中心;记录的最常见原因是“最近的医疗机构”(57.8%)。在 HEMS 和 GEMS 中,第 1 步患者的院前时间增加,其在途中恶化的比例也随之增加(p<0.001)。总体而言,12.2%的第 1 步患者在转运过程中恶化,最常见的原因是 GCS 下降(中位数变化,-5 分;GCS 下降患者的四分位距,-3 至-9)。HEMS 患者在现场更有可能符合第 1 步标准(29.9%比 GEMS 的 5.8%,p<0.001),且更有可能恶化(27.8%比 GEMS 的 6.1%,p<0.001)。

结论

这项研究表明,在农村州,符合 FTDS 第 1 步标准的受伤患者只有大约一半时间能到达 I 级至 III 级创伤中心。FTDS 第 1 步标准确定了处于更高风险的患者在院前有进一步恶化的风险。这些数据表明,与在 1 小时后恶化不同,患者在整个院前转运过程中经历临床恶化的比例不断增加。

证据水平

治疗性,IV 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验