Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):e378-e386. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002295.
Shock refractory to fluid and catecholamine therapy has significant morbidity and mortality in children. The use of methylene blue to treat refractory shock in children is not well described. We aim to collect and summarize the literature and define physicians' practice patterns regarding the use of methylene blue to treat shock in children.
We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane for studies involving the use of methylene blue for catecholamine-refractory shock from database inception to 2019. Collected studies were analyzed qualitatively. To describe practice patterns of methylene blue use, we electronically distributed a survey to U.S.-based pediatric critical care physicians. We assessed physician knowledge and experience with methylene blue. Survey responses were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated.
Pediatric critical and cardiac care units.
Patients less than or equal to 25 years old with refractory shock treated with methylene blue.
None.
One-thousand two-hundred ninety-three abstracts met search criteria, 139 articles underwent full-text review, and 24 studies were included. Studies investigated refractory shock induced by a variety of etiologies and found that methylene blue was generally safe and increased mean arterial blood pressure. There is overall lack of studies, low number of study patients, and low quality of studies identified. Our survey had a 22.5% response rate, representing 125 institutions. Similar proportions of physicians reported using (40%) or never even considering (43%) methylene blue for shock. The most common reasons for not using methylene blue were unfamiliarity with this drug, its proper dosing, and lack of evidentiary support.
Methylene blue appears safe and may benefit children with refractory shock. There is a stark divide in familiarity and practice patterns regarding its use among physicians. Studies to formally assess safety and efficacy of methylene blue in treating pediatric shock are warranted.
液体和儿茶酚胺治疗无效的休克在儿童中具有显著的发病率和死亡率。使用亚甲蓝治疗儿童难治性休克的方法尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在收集和总结相关文献,并确定医生使用亚甲蓝治疗儿童休克的实践模式。
我们对 MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统检索,检索内容为从数据库建立到 2019 年期间使用亚甲蓝治疗儿茶酚胺抵抗性休克的研究。对收集的研究进行定性分析。为了描述亚甲蓝使用的实践模式,我们向美国儿科重症监护医生电子分发了一份调查。我们评估了医生对亚甲蓝的了解程度和使用经验。对调查结果进行了定量和定性评估。
儿科重症和心脏监护病房。
接受亚甲蓝治疗的年龄≤25 岁、难治性休克患者。
无。
检索到 1293 篇摘要,139 篇文章进行了全文审查,最终纳入 24 项研究。这些研究调查了由多种病因引起的难治性休克,结果表明亚甲蓝通常是安全的,并可增加平均动脉压。研究发现,总的来说,研究数量少,研究患者数量少,研究质量低。我们的调查回复率为 22.5%,代表了 125 家机构。报告使用(40%)或从未考虑使用(43%)亚甲蓝治疗休克的医生比例相似。不使用亚甲蓝的最常见原因是不熟悉该药、正确的剂量以及缺乏证据支持。
亚甲蓝似乎是安全的,可能对难治性休克的儿童有益。医生对其使用的熟悉程度和实践模式存在明显差异。有必要进行正式评估亚甲蓝治疗儿童休克的安全性和疗效的研究。