• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用欧洲标准 EN 13624 和 EN 16615 对耳念珠菌和白色念珠菌对化学消毒剂的敏感性进行调查。

Investigation of the susceptibility of Candida auris and Candida albicans to chemical disinfectants using European Standards EN 13624 and EN 16615.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Albstadt-Sigmaringen University, Sigmaringen, Germany; Department of Research and Scientific Services, Schülke & Mayr GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany.

Department of Research and Scientific Services, Schülke & Mayr GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2020 Aug;105(4):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.026
PMID:32454076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the first appearance of Candida auris in 2009, this yeast has become a relevant pathogen in the clinical field. C. auris has been detected on various surfaces in health facilities, and is therefore a target for appropriate disinfection procedures. Preventive measures have to be implemented based on disinfectants with proven efficacy against C. auris.

AIM

The chemical tolerance of C. auris was compared with the surrogate test organism Candida albicans as established in the European standards (EN). In this way, conclusions will be drawn as to whether the disinfectants tested according to EN 13624 and EN 16615 are at least equally effective against C. auris.

METHODS

The chemical susceptibility of C. auris and C. albicans was investigated using standardized EN test protocols. EN 13624 and EN 16615 were used in this study to examine two commercially available surface disinfectants based on alcohol and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), respectively. In addition, the survival rates of the two yeast species were studied on a defined test surface simulating practical conditions.

FINDINGS

In comparison with C. albicans, C. auris was found to be significantly more susceptible to the alcohol- and QAC-based disinfectants used in this study. C. albicans was found to be more tolerant to drying on the test surface in EN 16615, yielding higher recovery rates.

CONCLUSION

C. albicans is a suitable surrogate test organism when targeting yeasticidal efficacy, which, based on EN 13624 and EN 16615, includes efficacy against the human pathogen C. auris.

摘要

背景

自 2009 年首次发现耳念珠菌以来,这种酵母菌已成为临床领域的一个重要病原体。耳念珠菌已在医疗机构的各种表面上被检测到,因此是适当消毒程序的目标。必须根据已证明对耳念珠菌有效的消毒剂实施预防措施。

目的

将耳念珠菌的化学耐受性与欧洲标准(EN)中建立的替代测试生物体白色念珠菌进行比较。通过这种方式,可以得出结论,根据 EN 13624 和 EN 16615 测试的消毒剂是否至少对耳念珠菌具有同等的有效性。

方法

使用标准化的 EN 测试协议研究了耳念珠菌和白色念珠菌的化学敏感性。本研究使用 EN 13624 和 EN 16615 来检查两种市售的基于酒精和季铵化合物(QAC)的表面消毒剂。此外,还研究了这两种酵母菌在模拟实际条件的定义测试表面上的存活率。

结果

与白色念珠菌相比,本研究中使用的基于酒精和 QAC 的消毒剂对耳念珠菌的敏感性明显更高。在 EN 16615 中,在测试表面上干燥时,白色念珠菌的耐受性更高,回收率更高。

结论

当针对杀酵母效果(根据 EN 13624 和 EN 16615 包括对人类病原体耳念珠菌的效果)时,白色念珠菌是合适的替代测试生物体。

相似文献

1
Investigation of the susceptibility of Candida auris and Candida albicans to chemical disinfectants using European Standards EN 13624 and EN 16615.采用欧洲标准 EN 13624 和 EN 16615 对耳念珠菌和白色念珠菌对化学消毒剂的敏感性进行调查。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Aug;105(4):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Yeasticidal activity of chemical disinfectants and antiseptics against Candida auris.化学消毒剂和防腐剂对耳念珠菌的杀酵母活性。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Dec;97(4):371-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Efficacy of octenidine- and chlorhexidine-based wash-mitts against Candida albicans and Candida auris - a comparative study.基于奥替尼啶和洗必泰的清洗手套对抗白色念珠菌和耳念珠菌的疗效 - 一项对比研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Jan;143:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.10.018. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
4
Antimicrobial efficacy and compatibility of solid copper alloys with chemical disinfectants.固体铜合金与化学消毒剂的抗菌效果和相容性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200748. eCollection 2018.
5
Susceptibility of Candida auris and Candida albicans to 21 germicides used in healthcare facilities.耳念珠菌和白念珠菌对医疗机构中使用的 21 种杀真菌剂的敏感性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):380-382. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.1. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Different efficacies of common disinfection methods against candida auris and other candida species.常见消毒方法对耳念珠菌和其他念珠菌属种的不同杀菌效果。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 May;13(5):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
The effectiveness of surface disinfectants and a micellic HO based water disinfectant on Candida auris.表面消毒剂和基于胶束 HO 的水消毒剂对耳念珠菌的有效性。
J Mycol Med. 2021 Dec;31(4):101178. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2021.101178. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
Effectiveness of Disinfectants Against Candida auris and Other Candida Species.消毒剂对耳念珠菌和其他念珠菌属种的有效性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1240-1243. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.162. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
9
Skin and hard surface disinfection against - What we know today.针对……的皮肤和硬表面消毒——我们如今所了解的情况。 (原英文文本表述不完整,推测可能是针对某种病原体等的消毒,但仅根据现有文本只能这样翻译)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 7;11:1312929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1312929. eCollection 2024.
10
Demonstration of the yeasticidal efficacy of povidone-iodine-based commercial antiseptic solutions against Candida auris.证明聚维酮碘为基础的商业抗菌溶液对耳念珠菌的杀酵母功效。
J Mycol Med. 2021 Dec;31(4):101173. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2021.101173. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Overview of Environmental Disinfection and Decolonization of : A Systematic Review from 2020 to 2025.环境消毒与去定植的当前概述:2020年至2025年的系统评价
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 2;10(6):155. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10060155.
2
Dry Surface Biofilm Formation by Candida auris Facilitates Persistence and Tolerance to Sodium Hypochlorite.耳念珠菌形成的干性表面生物膜促进其持久性及对次氯酸钠的耐受性。
APMIS. 2025 Apr;133(4):e70022. doi: 10.1111/apm.70022.
3
Variable sensitivity of clinical Candida auris strains to Biocides: implications for infection control in Healthcare Settings.
临床假丝酵母菌菌株对消毒剂的可变敏感性:对医疗机构感染控制的影响。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Nov 4;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03605-w.
4
The many faces of Candida auris: Phenotypic and strain variation in an emerging pathogen.耳念珠菌的多面性:一种新兴病原体的表型和菌株变异。
PLoS Pathog. 2024 Mar 1;20(3):e1012011. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012011. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Skin and hard surface disinfection against - What we know today.针对……的皮肤和硬表面消毒——我们如今所了解的情况。 (原英文文本表述不完整,推测可能是针对某种病原体等的消毒,但仅根据现有文本只能这样翻译)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 7;11:1312929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1312929. eCollection 2024.
6
activity of sanitizers against mono- and polymicrobial biofilms of and .消毒剂对 和 单种和混合生物膜活性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Oct 18;67(10):e0053423. doi: 10.1128/aac.00534-23. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Use of the European standardization framework established by CEN/TC 216 for effective disinfection strategies in human medicine, veterinary medicine, food hygiene, industry, and domestic and institutional use - a review.使用由CEN/TC 216制定的欧洲标准化框架制定人类医学、兽医学、食品卫生、工业以及家庭和机构用途的有效消毒策略——综述
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2022 Jul 7;17:Doc14. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000417. eCollection 2022.
8
Successful control of Candida auris transmission in a German COVID-19 intensive care unit.成功控制德国 COVID-19 重症监护病房中念珠菌的传播。
Mycoses. 2022 Jun;65(6):643-649. doi: 10.1111/myc.13443. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
9
Evaluating the Virucidal Activity of Disinfectants According to European Union Standards.评估消毒剂根据欧盟标准的病毒杀灭活性。
Viruses. 2021 Mar 24;13(4):534. doi: 10.3390/v13040534.