Oda Goshi, Nakagawa Tsuyoshi, Ogawa Ayumi, Kumaki Yuichi, Hosoya Tokuko, Sugimoto Hitoshi, Ishiba Toshiyuki, Mio Mori, Fujioka Tomoyuki, Kubota Kazunori, Onishi Iichiroh, Uetake Hiroyuki
Department of Surgical Specialties, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;13(1):67-72. doi: 10.3892/mco.2020.2036. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Preoperatively diagnosed ductal carcinoma (DCIS) is sometimes upstaged to invasive cancer by postoperative pathological examination. Various preoperative factors associated with upstaging to invasive cancer have been reported; however, this subject remains to be clarified. DCIS takes various forms on imaging, but many cases show non-mass-type lesions. In non-mass-type DCIS, recognizing the presence of invasion is difficult. To investigate predictors associated with upstaging to invasive cancer more precisely, we examined only non-mass-type DCIS. The present study retrospectively analyzed 101 patients diagnosed with non-mass-type DCIS preoperatively on breast biopsy at our institution between 2007 and 2017. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact probability test and two-sample t-tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. The results showed that 27 patients (27%) were finally diagnosed with invasive cancer. Univariate analysis revealed abnormal result of palpation on breast examination (P=0.05), comedo necrosis (P=0.05), and HER2 status (P=0.02) as significant predictors. Multivariate analysis revealed an abnormal result of palpation as an independent predictor of invasive cancer underestimation (odds ratio 4.76; confidence interval 1.44-15.7; P=0.01). In conclusion, preoperatively diagnosed non-mass-type DCIS represented an underestimation in approximately 27% of cases. In particular, the presence of a clinically abnormal palpation increases the chance of upstaging to invasive cancer.
术前诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)的病例,术后病理检查有时会被升级为浸润性癌。已有多种与升级为浸润性癌相关的术前因素被报道;然而,这一问题仍有待阐明。DCIS在影像学上有多种表现形式,但许多病例表现为非肿块型病变。在非肿块型DCIS中,识别浸润的存在较为困难。为了更精确地研究与升级为浸润性癌相关的预测因素,我们仅研究了非肿块型DCIS。本研究回顾性分析了2007年至2017年间在我院经乳腺活检术前诊断为非肿块型DCIS的101例患者。数据采用Fisher精确概率检验和两样本t检验进行分析。使用逻辑回归进行多变量分析。结果显示,27例患者(27%)最终被诊断为浸润性癌。单变量分析显示,乳腺检查触诊结果异常(P=0.05)、粉刺样坏死(P=0.05)和HER2状态(P=0.02)是显著的预测因素。多变量分析显示,触诊结果异常是浸润性癌低估的独立预测因素(比值比4.76;置信区间1.44-15.7;P=0.01)。总之,术前诊断的非肿块型DCIS在约27%的病例中存在低估情况。特别是,临床触诊异常增加了升级为浸润性癌的可能性。