• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏T2映射:标准化在线分析的稳健性和同质性。

Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis.

作者信息

Wiesmueller Marco, Wuest Wolfgang, Heiss Rafael, Treutlein Christoph, Uder Michael, May Matthias Stefan

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 May 28;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x
PMID:32460852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Interpretation of T2 values remains difficult due to limited comparability across hardware and software systems and the lack of validated measurement recommendations for the number and orientation of mandatory slices. Our aims were to provide a standardized comparison of intra- and inter-individual T2 values in the short and long axes and to investigate inter-scanner reproducibility.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Ninety cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies in 30 healthy subjects were performed with three identical 1.5 T CMR scanners (same hardware and software) using a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) gradient echo sequence in three short axis (SAx) and three long axis (LAx) views. A commercially available T2 mapping software package of the latest generation with automatic in-line motion correction was used for acquisition. Regions of interest were manually drawn in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA) model in three SAx and three LAx acquisitions. Analysis of inter-scanner, inter-segmental, intra-segmental, inter-regional and inter-level differences was performed.

RESULTS

Inter-scanner reproducibility was high and the mean myocardial T2 value for all evaluated segments was 45.7 ± 3.4 ms. Significant inter-segmental variations of mean T2 values were found. Mean intra-segmental T2 values were comparable between LAx and SAx acquisitions in 72%. Significantly higher T2 values were found in apical segments and a significant disparity among different regions was found for SAx and LAx orientations.

CONCLUSION

Standardized cardiac T2 mapping is highly reproducible on identical CMR systems. T2 values vary significantly between single heart segments, regions, levels, and axes in young, healthy subjects.

摘要

背景与目的

由于硬件和软件系统之间的可比性有限,以及缺乏针对必需切片数量和方向的经过验证的测量建议,T2值的解读仍然困难。我们的目的是对短轴和长轴上个体内和个体间的T2值进行标准化比较,并研究不同扫描仪之间的可重复性。

方法与材料

使用三个相同的1.5T心脏磁共振成像(CMR)扫描仪(相同的硬件和软件),对30名健康受试者进行了90次CMR研究,采用平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)梯度回波序列,采集三个短轴(SAx)和三个长轴(LAx)视图。使用具有自动在线运动校正功能的最新一代商用T2映射软件包进行采集。根据美国心脏协会(AHA)模型,在三个SAx和三个LAx采集中,在16个心肌节段的每一个中手动绘制感兴趣区域。进行了不同扫描仪、节段间、节段内、区域间和层面间差异的分析。

结果

不同扫描仪之间的可重复性很高,所有评估节段的平均心肌T2值为45.7±3.4毫秒。发现平均T2值存在显著的节段间差异。72%的节段内平均T2值在LAx和SAx采集中具有可比性。在心尖节段发现显著更高的T2值,并且在SAx和LAx方向上不同区域之间存在显著差异。

结论

在相同的CMR系统上,标准化心脏T2映射具有高度可重复性。在年轻健康受试者中,T2值在单个心脏节段、区域、层面和轴之间存在显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/2e1a47528985/12968_2020_619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/049e6916693e/12968_2020_619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/a371ed219c67/12968_2020_619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/f1896406f67a/12968_2020_619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/7850f053c7a2/12968_2020_619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/1e95999d2dfb/12968_2020_619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/2e1a47528985/12968_2020_619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/049e6916693e/12968_2020_619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/a371ed219c67/12968_2020_619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/f1896406f67a/12968_2020_619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/7850f053c7a2/12968_2020_619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/1e95999d2dfb/12968_2020_619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b79/7254724/2e1a47528985/12968_2020_619_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis.心脏T2映射:标准化在线分析的稳健性和同质性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 May 28;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x.
2
Cardiac T2 star mapping: standardized inline analysis of long and short axis at three identical 1.5 T MRI scanners.心脏T2* 成像:在三台相同的1.5T磁共振成像扫描仪上对长轴和短轴进行标准化在线分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;35(4):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1503-1. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.不同扫描仪间 native 心肌 T1 和 T2 映射的 Z 评分的可重复性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024 Summer;26(1):100004. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100004. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Variability and homogeneity of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T2-mapping in volunteers compared to patients with edema.志愿者与水肿患者的心血管磁共振心肌 T2 映射的可变性和同质性比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Mar 27;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-27.
5
Native cardiac T1 Mapping: Standardized inline analysis of long and short axis at three identical 1.5 Tesla MRI scanners.原生心脏 T1 映射:在三台相同的 1.5T MRI 扫描仪上进行长轴和短轴的标准化内联分析。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
6
Myocardial T2 values at 1.5 T by a segmental approach with healthy aging and gender.采用节段法测量1.5T时健康老龄化及不同性别心肌的T2值。
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2962-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08396-6. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
7
Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.心血管磁共振心肌特征追踪研究间可重复性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jun 21;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-43.
8
Cardiac T2-mapping using a fast gradient echo spin echo sequence - first in vitro and in vivo experience.使用快速梯度回波自旋回波序列进行心脏T2映射——首次体外和体内实验经验。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 1;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0177-2.
9
Comparison of long and short axis quantification of left ventricular volume parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, with ex-vivo validation.心血管磁共振长轴和短轴左心室容积参数定量比较及其与离体验证。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Aug 11;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-40.
10
The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.心血管磁共振心肌特征追踪应变评估的观察者内可重复性与磁场强度无关。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.012. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of CMR parametric mapping in cardiac amyloidosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏磁共振成像参数映射在心脏淀粉样变性中的预后价值:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2025 Aug 14;12(2):e003551. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003551.
2
Diagnostic Value of T2 Mapping in Sacroiliitis Associated with Spondyloarthropathy.T2 映射成像在与脊柱关节病相关的骶髂关节炎中的诊断价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;15(13):1634. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131634.
3
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.

本文引用的文献

1
Accurate, precise, simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping using a radial sequence with inversion recovery and T2 preparation.使用带反转恢复和 T2 准备的径向序列进行准确、精确、同时的心肌 T1 和 T2 映射。
NMR Biomed. 2019 Nov;32(11):e4165. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4165. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: A single center study.20 个月内切片交错 T1 和 T2 映射序列的测量可重复性:一项单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220190. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of MR T1 and T2 mapping parameters to characterize myocardial and skeletal muscle involvement in systemic idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).
心血管磁共振学会心血管磁共振参考值(“正常值”):2025年更新。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101853. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101853. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
CMR Findings in COVID-19 Recovered Patients: A Review on Parametric Mapping, Feature-Tracking, and LGE.新冠康复患者的心脏磁共振成像(CMR)研究结果:参数映射、特征追踪和延迟强化成像综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 21;23(11):355. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311355. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
A 3-slice cardiac quantitative native and post-contrast T1 and T2 MRI protocol requiring only four BHs using a 72-channel receive array coil.一种使用72通道接收阵列线圈、仅需四个屏气的3层心脏定量平扫及增强后T1和T2磁共振成像协议。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 27;10:1285206. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1285206. eCollection 2023.
6
Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).多中心参数 T1 和 T2 mapping 比较:柏林心血管磁共振研究网络中的健康旅行志愿者(BER-CMR)。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Aug 14;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00954-9.
7
Exercise-induced myocardial T1 increase and right ventricular dysfunction in recreational cyclists: a CMR study.运动诱导的心肌 T1 增加和业余自行车运动员的右心室功能障碍:一项 CMR 研究。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Oct;123(10):2107-2117. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05259-4. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
8
Differentiation of acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and acute infarct-like myocarditis by visual pattern analysis: a head-to-head comparison of different cardiac MR techniques.基于视觉模式分析对急性非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与急性心肌梗相似性心肌炎的鉴别诊断:不同心脏磁共振技术的头对头比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6258-6266. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09905-5. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
9
Developing a medical device-grade T phantom optimized for myocardial T mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.开发一种心血管磁共振用的、适用于心肌 T 映射的医疗设备级 T phantom。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Mar 20;25(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00926-z.
10
Imaging Methods: Magnetic Resonance Imaging.影像方法:磁共振成像。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jan;16(1):e014068. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014068. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
对比 MRI T1 和 T2 映射参数以特征化系统性特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)的心肌和骨骼肌受累情况。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5139-5147. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06054-6. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Cardiac MRI Texture Analysis of T1 and T2 Maps in Patients with Infarctlike Acute Myocarditis.心肌梗死样急性心肌炎患者 T1 和 T2 图的心脏 MRI 纹理分析。
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):357-365. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180411. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
5
Reverse double inversion-recovery: Improving motion robustness of cardiac T -weighted dark-blood turbo spin-echo sequence.反转双反转恢复:提高心脏 T2 加权黑血涡轮自旋回波序列的运动鲁棒性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jun;47(6):1498-1508. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25886. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging phantoms: A review and the need for a system phantom.定量磁共振成像体模:综述与系统体模的需求。
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):48-61. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26982. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).临床推荐意见:心血管磁共振 T1、T2、T2* 和细胞外容积mapping:心血管磁共振学会(SCMR)的共识声明,得到欧洲心血管影像协会(EACVI)的认可。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8.
8
Acute versus Chronic Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Native T1 and T2 Mapping versus Assessment of Edema on Standard T2-weighted Cardiovascular MR Images for Differentiation.急性与慢性心肌梗死:定量 native T1 和 T2 映射与标准 T2 加权心血管 MR 图像上水肿评估对鉴别诊断的准确性比较。
Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):83-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162338. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
9
Cardiac MRI evaluation of myocardial disease.心肌病的心脏磁共振成像评估。
Heart. 2016 Sep 15;102(18):1429-35. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309077. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
10
Reproducibility of three different cardiac T -mapping sequences at 1.5T.1.5T下三种不同心脏T映射序列的可重复性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1168-1178. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25258. Epub 2016 Apr 4.