• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人创伤后应激障碍:ICD-11 和 DSM-5 中 PTSD 的差异项目功能分析。

Posttraumatic stress disorder among older adults: A differential item functioning analysis of PTSD in ICD-11 and DSM-5.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2020 Oct;12(7):799-806. doi: 10.1037/tra0000596. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000596
PMID:32463286
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Distinct models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are outlined in the 5th edition of the and the 11th version of the . Limited data exists about the validity of these models among older adults. This study examines the probable prevalence rates of PTSD in older adults; the factorial validity of both models; and symptom-endorsement bias across sex.

METHOD

Using a nationally representative (United States) sample ( = 5,366) of older adults aged 60 years and older, alternative PTSD factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and item bias was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis. PTSD was measured without the functional impairment criterion, likely resulting in inflated prevalence rates.

RESULTS

(9.5%) PTSD prevalence was significantly higher than (8.7%). Women were more likely to meet criteria for ( = 1.79) and ( = 1.38) PTSD. CFA results showed that both models of PTSD had excellent fit. Four DSM-5 symptoms demonstrated DIF, with females more likely to endorse three symptoms (B1: "unwanted memories"; B4: "feeling upset"; and E6: "sleep problems") and males more likely to endorse one symptom (E2: "reckless or self-destructive behavior"). No DIF was present for the 6 symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Both PTSD models perform well among older adults, although there is evidence of DIF in the model. A considerable proportion of older adults met diagnostic requirements for PTSD, thus highlighting the importance of trauma-related research among older adult populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第十一版概述了不同的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)模式。关于这些模式在老年人中的有效性,数据有限。本研究检验了老年人中 PTSD 的可能患病率;这两种模式的因子有效性;以及跨性别症状认可偏差。

方法

使用全国代表性(美国)样本(n=5366),对年龄在 60 岁及以上的老年人进行了 PTSD 的替代因子模型的验证性因子分析(CFA),并使用差异项目功能(DIF)分析评估了项目偏差。PTSD 的测量不包括功能障碍标准,可能导致患病率升高。

结果

(9.5%)PTSD 的患病率明显高于《国际疾病分类》第十版(8.7%)。女性更有可能符合 (=1.79)和 (=1.38)PTSD 的标准。CFA 结果表明,PTSD 的两种模型都具有良好的拟合度。DSM-5 的四个症状表现出 DIF,女性更有可能认可三个症状(B1:“不受欢迎的记忆”;B4:“感到不安”;和 E6:“睡眠问题”),男性更有可能认可一个症状(E2:“鲁莽或自我毁灭行为”)。没有 DIF 存在于 6 个症状中。

结论

虽然 PTSD 模型在老年人中表现良好,但在 模型中存在证据表明存在 DIF。相当一部分老年人符合 PTSD 的诊断要求,因此强调了在老年人群体中进行创伤相关研究的重要性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Posttraumatic stress disorder among older adults: A differential item functioning analysis of PTSD in ICD-11 and DSM-5.老年人创伤后应激障碍:ICD-11 和 DSM-5 中 PTSD 的差异项目功能分析。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Oct;12(7):799-806. doi: 10.1037/tra0000596. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
Sex differences in PTSD symptoms: A differential item functioning approach.创伤后应激障碍症状的性别差异:一种差异项目功能方法。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Mar;11(3):319-327. doi: 10.1037/tra0000355. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
4
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Comparing diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth.比较创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤暴露青年样本中的诊断标准。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms among male and female returning veterans.研究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状在退伍男性和女性中的诊断效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Aug;34(8):752-760. doi: 10.1002/da.22667. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
Latent factor structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluation of method variance and construct validity of novel symptom clusters.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍的潜在因子结构:新症状群的方法偏差和建构效度评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jan;31(1):46-58. doi: 10.1037/pas0000642. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
9
Assessing prevalence, validity, and correlates of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in Ireland.评估爱尔兰创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍的流行程度、效度及其相关因素。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Jul;16(5):784-793. doi: 10.1037/tra0001472. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Very Young Children: Diagnostic Agreement Between ICD-11 and DSM-5.创伤后应激障碍在非常年幼的儿童中:ICD-11 与 DSM-5 之间的诊断一致性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Aug;31(4):529-539. doi: 10.1002/jts.22314. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of trauma and how to intervene: a narrative review of psychotraumatology over the past 15 years.创伤的影响及如何干预:对过去15年心理创伤学的叙述性综述
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2458406. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2458406. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex PTSD: prevalence, predictors, and construct validity in Swiss older adults.国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍:瑞士老年人中的患病率、预测因素及结构效度
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2445368. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2445368. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Adverse childhood experiences and ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder in Poland: a population-based study.
波兰的儿童期不良经历与国际疾病分类第 11 版复杂创伤后应激障碍:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2420464. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2420464. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria of PTSD among Chinese trauma-exposed adolescent samples.中国遭受创伤的青少年样本中创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准比较
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 13;14:1186138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1186138. eCollection 2023.
5
The Need for a Diagnostic Instrument to Assess Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in People with Dementia: Findings from a Delphi Study.需要一种诊断工具来评估痴呆患者的创伤后应激障碍:德尔菲研究的结果。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2023 Mar;36(2):129-142. doi: 10.1177/08919887221103583. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Sex and age differences in ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: An analysis of four general population samples.ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 中的性别和年龄差异:对四个一般人群样本的分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 4;64(1):e66. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2239.
7
Posttraumatic stress disorder, complex PTSD and subtypes of loneliness among older adults.创伤后应激障碍、复杂性创伤后应激障碍与老年人孤独感的亚型
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Feb;78(2):321-342. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23225. Epub 2021 Jul 20.