• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声造影(CEUS)在钙化性乳腺病变的诊断中是否发挥着更好的作用?与磁共振成像(MRI)的比较。

Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.

作者信息

Pan Jiamin, Tong Wenjuan, Luo Jia, Liang Jinyu, Pan Fushun, Zheng Yanling, Xie Xiaoyan

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20200195. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200195. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20200195
PMID:32463295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7446019/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enabled reclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS-BI-RADS) with MRI in the diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification.

METHODS

A total of 52 breast lesions with calcification from 51 patients were detected by ultrasound as hyperechoic foci and categorized as BI-RADS 3-5. The 51 patients further underwent CEUS scan and MRI. The ultrasound-BI-RADS combined with CEUS 5-point score system redefined the classification of BI-RADS which was called CEUS-BI-RADS. The diagnostic efficacy of three methods was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Histopathological assessment used as the gold-standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of Ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI classification of BI-RADS (MRI-BI-RADS) and CEUS-BI-RADS were 85%, 90% and 95% without significant difference among the three modalities ( > 0.05). The diagnostic specificities of ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI-BI-RADS and CEUS-BI-RADS were 78.1%, 78.1% and 96.8%, respectively ( < 0.05); and the accuracy were 80.7%, 82.6% and 96.1% for ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI-BI-RADS and CEUS-BI-RADS, respectively ( < 0.05). The area under ROC (AUROC) in differentiation of breast lesions with calcification was 0.945 for CEUS-BI-RADS, 0.907 for MRI-BI-RADS and 0.853 for ultrasound-BI-RADS, with no significant difference among the three modalities ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The CEUS-BI-RADS has a better diagnostic efficiency than MRI-BI-RADS in the differentiation of the breast lesions with calcification.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

•CEUS is a better method in differentiation of breast lesions with calcification.•CEUS-BI-RADS increases the efficiency of diagnosis compared to MRI.

摘要

目的

比较超声造影引导下的乳腺影像报告和数据系统重新分类(CEUS-BI-RADS)与磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断伴有钙化的乳腺病变中的疗效。

方法

通过超声检测到51例患者共52个伴有钙化的乳腺病变为高回声灶,并归类为BI-RADS 3-5级。这51例患者进一步接受了超声造影扫描和MRI检查。超声-BI-RADS联合超声造影5分评分系统重新定义了BI-RADS分类,称为CEUS-BI-RADS。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估三种方法的诊断效能。以组织病理学评估作为金标准。

结果

超声-BI-RADS、MRI的BI-RADS分类(MRI-BI-RADS)和CEUS-BI-RADS的敏感度分别为85%、90%和95%,三种检查方法之间无显著差异(>0.05)。超声-BI-RADS、MRI-BI-RADS和CEUS-BI-RADS的诊断特异性分别为78.1%、78.1%和96.8%(<0.05);超声-BI-RADS、MRI-BI-RADS和CEUS-BI-RADS的准确率分别为80.7%、82.6%和96.1%(<0.05)。CEUS-BI-RADS在鉴别伴有钙化的乳腺病变时的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.945,MRI-BI-RADS为0.907,超声-BI-RADS为0.853,三种检查方法之间无显著差异(>0.05)。

结论

在鉴别伴有钙化的乳腺病变方面,CEUS-BI-RADS比MRI-BI-RADS具有更好的诊断效率。

知识进展

•超声造影是鉴别伴有钙化的乳腺病变的更好方法。•与MRI相比,CEUS-BI-RADS提高了诊断效率。

相似文献

1
Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.超声造影(CEUS)在钙化性乳腺病变的诊断中是否发挥着更好的作用?与磁共振成像(MRI)的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20200195. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200195. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.乳腺亚厘米级病变的诊断:联合乳腺影像报告和数据系统-超声(BI-RADS-US)、应变弹性成像及超声造影在中国的初步研究
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2443-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4628-4. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging.常规超声联合超声造影在磁共振成像检测 BI-RADS 4 病变评估中的临床价值。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Aug 1;95(1136):20220025. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220025. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications.超声造影在乳腺 US-BI-RADS 3、4 类伴钙化病灶诊断中的价值。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Dec;75(12):934-941. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
5
A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Additive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Biopsy Decision of Ultrasound BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.对比增强超声在超声 BI-RADS 4 类乳腺病变活检决策中附加价值的前瞻性多中心研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Aug;50(8):1224-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 May 24.
6
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.超声造影在乳腺小病灶诊断中的应用
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(3):291-300. doi: 10.3233/CH-170368.
7
The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.超声造影在诊断恶性非肿块型乳腺病变中的作用及诊断标准探讨。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Apr 1;94(1120):20200880. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200880. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.超声造影及超声弹性成像对 BI-RADS 分类 4 类触诊阴性乳腺肿块的预测价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Apr;173:111391. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111391. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.将超声造影纳入BI-RADS评分系统可提高乳腺肿瘤诊断的准确性:一项中国的初步研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Nov;42(11):2630-2638. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
Evaluating diagnostic significance: The utilization of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis in breast lesions.评估诊断意义:弹性成像和超声造影在乳腺病变鉴别诊断中的应用。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024;88(1):81-95. doi: 10.3233/CH-242216.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia.假血管瘤样间质增生的常规超声与超声造影特征分析
Breast J. 2025 Jul 10;2025:6070736. doi: 10.1155/tbj/6070736. eCollection 2025.
2
The benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.超声造影在乳腺可疑病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 24;11:1511200. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1511200. eCollection 2024.
3
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of tuberous vas deferens tuberculosis.超声造影在精囊结核诊断中的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08886-6.
4
The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition.日本乳腺癌学会乳腺癌筛查和诊断临床实践指南,2022 年版。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Mar;31(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
Head-to-head comparison of perfluorobutane contrast-enhanced US and multiparametric MRI for breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter study.对比氟丙烷对比增强超声与多参数 MRI 用于乳腺癌的头对头研究:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 May 30;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01650-3.
6
Third-look contrast-enhanced ultrasonography plus needle biopsy for differential diagnosis of magnetic resonance imaging-only detected breast lesions.三时相增强超声造影联合超声引导下穿刺活检在 MRI 发现的乳腺病变鉴别诊断中的应用
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2024 Oct;51(4):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01298-8. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
7
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant superficial lymph node lesions.超声造影与剪切波弹性成像在鉴别浅表淋巴结良恶性病变中的价值。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):11625-11631. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment.超声造影下乳腺非肿块样病变:特征分析、乳腺影像报告和数据系统分类评估
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Feb 26;8(4):700-712. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.700.
2
Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.致密型乳腺女性的补充性磁共振成像筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2091-2102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903986.
3
Radiological, Histological and Chemical Analysis of Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Value and Biological Significance.乳腺微钙化的放射学、组织学及化学分析:诊断价值与生物学意义
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2018 Jun;23(1-2):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s10911-018-9396-0. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
American College of Radiology Accreditation, Performance Metrics, Reimbursement, and Economic Considerations in Breast MR Imaging.美国放射学会乳腺磁共振成像的认证、性能指标、报销及经济考量
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 May;26(2):303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.12.004.
5
Regional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) Characteristics of Breast Cancer and Correlation with Microvessel Density (MVD).乳腺癌的区域对比增强超声(CEUS)特征及其与微血管密度(MVD)的相关性
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jul 14;23:3428-3436. doi: 10.12659/msm.901734.
6
The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast.乳腺多参数磁共振成像的潜力。
Br J Radiol. 2017 Jan;90(1069):20160715. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160715. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.乳腺亚厘米级病变的诊断:联合乳腺影像报告和数据系统-超声(BI-RADS-US)、应变弹性成像及超声造影在中国的初步研究
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2443-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4628-4. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.将超声造影纳入BI-RADS评分系统可提高乳腺肿瘤诊断的准确性:一项中国的初步研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Nov;42(11):2630-2638. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in China.乳腺超声造影:评分系统是否可行?一项中国的初步研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e105517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105517. eCollection 2014.
10
Infiltrating syringomatous adenoma of the nipple: Sonographic and mammographic features with pathologic correlation.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2014 Sep;42(7):427-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22150. Epub 2014 Mar 19.