University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Centre, Kisumu, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233691. eCollection 2020.
Chickens are a widely held economic and nutritional asset in rural Africa and are frequently managed by women. Despite potential benefits of larger flock sizes, the average number of chickens kept at the household level is reported to be low. Whether this reflects decision-making to maximize benefits per unit labor by voluntary reduction of chicken numbers by consumption or sale versus involuntary losses due to mortality is a significant gap in knowledge relevant to improving smallholder household welfare.
In a 4-year longitudinal study of 1,908 smallholder households in rural western Kenya, the number of chickens owned by quarterly census at each household was determined. Households reported gains and losses of chicken over the immediate previous quarter. Gains were classified as on-farm or off-farm; losses were classified as voluntary (sales, gifts, consumption) or involuntary (mortality, unclassified loss).
The mean number of chickens owned over the 16 quarters was 10, consistent with prior cross-sectional data. Involuntary losses represented 70% of total off-take, while voluntary off-take represented the remaining 30%. Mortality composed 60% of total reported off-take and accounted for most of the involuntary losses. Household consumption, sales, and gifts represented 18%, 9%, and 3% of off-take, respectively.
The overwhelming majority of off-take can be classified as involuntary off-take, principally due to mortality, that does not reflect the owner's decision to maximize value through nutritional gain, income, or social capital. This strongly suggests that there is substantial opportunity to enhance the value of chickens as an asset, both nutritional and income generating, for smallholder households living at poverty level. Our findings suggest that programs emphasizing community level poultry vaccination and feed supplementation are much more likely to be effective than those solely focused on providing chickens.
在非洲农村,鸡是一种广泛持有的经济和营养资产,通常由女性管理。尽管较大的禽群规模有潜在的好处,但据报道,家庭层面饲养的鸡的平均数量较低。这是反映了通过消费或出售来自愿减少鸡的数量以最大化每单位劳动力的效益,还是由于死亡率导致的非自愿损失,这是一个与提高小农家庭福利相关的重要知识空白。
在肯尼亚西部农村对 1908 户小农家庭进行的为期 4 年的纵向研究中,通过每季度在每个家庭进行的普查来确定所拥有的鸡的数量。家庭报告了在上一季度之前鸡的增减情况。增益分为农场内和农场外;损失分为自愿(销售、赠送、消费)和非自愿(死亡率、未分类损失)。
在 16 个季度中,拥有的鸡的平均数量为 10,与之前的横断面数据一致。非自愿损失占总出栏量的 70%,而自愿出栏量占剩余的 30%。死亡率构成了总出栏量的 60%,并导致了大部分非自愿损失。家庭消费、销售和赠送分别占出栏量的 18%、9%和 3%。
绝大多数出栏量可归类为非自愿出栏量,主要是由于死亡率,这并不反映所有者通过营养收益、收入或社会资本来最大化价值的决策。这强烈表明,有很大的机会提高鸡作为一种资产的价值,无论是在营养还是在收入方面,对于生活在贫困线以下的小农家庭来说。我们的研究结果表明,强调社区层面家禽疫苗接种和饲料补充的计划比那些仅仅关注提供鸡的计划更有可能有效。