Suppr超能文献

一项简明的急诊科干预措施增强重症成年人启动预先医疗照护计划谈话的可信度和可行性研究。

Fidelity and Feasibility of a Brief Emergency Department Intervention to Empower Adults With Serious Illness to Initiate Advance Care Planning Conversations.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Dec;56(6):878-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Emergency department (ED) visits provide opportunities to empower patients to discuss advance care planning with their outpatient clinicians, but systematically developed, feasible interventions do not currently exist. Brief negotiated interview (BNI) interventions, which allow ED clinicians to efficiently motivate patients, have potential to meet this need.

OBJECTIVES

We developed a BNI ED intervention to empower older adults with life-limiting illness to formulate and communicate medical care goals to their primary outpatient clinicians. This study assessed the fidelity and feasibility of this intervention in a high-volume ED.

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients with serious illnesses (advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease on dialysis, predicted survival <12 months) in an urban, tertiary care academic medical center ED. All participants received the BNI intervention. We video-recorded the encounters. Two reviewers assessed the recordings for intervention fidelity based on adherence to the BNI steps (Part I) and communication skills (Part II).

RESULTS

We reviewed 46 video recordings. The mean total adherence score was 21.07/27 (SD 3.68) or 78.04%. The Part I mean adherence score was 12.07/15 (SD 2.07) or 80.47%. The Part II mean adherence score was 9.0/12 (SD 2.51) or 75%. The majority (75.6%) of recordings met the prespecified threshold for high intervention fidelity.

CONCLUSION

ED clinicians can deliver a BNI intervention to increase advance care planning conversations with high fidelity. Future research is needed to study the intervention's efficacy in a wider patient population.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)就诊为患者提供了与门诊临床医生讨论预先护理计划的机会,但目前尚无系统开发的可行干预措施。简短协商性访谈(BNI)干预措施使 ED 临床医生能够有效地激励患者,有可能满足这一需求。

目的

我们开发了一种 BNI ED 干预措施,使患有生命终末期疾病的老年人能够制定并向其主要门诊临床医生传达医疗保健目标。本研究评估了该干预措施在高容量 ED 中的保真度和可行性。

方法

我们招募了患有严重疾病的成年患者(晚期癌症、充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、透析慢性肾脏病,预计生存时间<12 个月),这些患者在城市三级保健学术医疗中心 ED 就诊。所有参与者都接受了 BNI 干预措施。我们对这些会面进行了视频记录。两名评审员根据对 BNI 步骤(第一部分)和沟通技巧(第二部分)的依从性来评估记录的干预措施的保真度。

结果

我们回顾了 46 个视频记录。总依从评分的平均值为 21.07/27(SD 3.68)或 78.04%。第一部分的平均依从评分是 12.07/15(SD 2.07)或 80.47%。第二部分的平均依从评分是 9.0/12(SD 2.51)或 75%。大多数(75.6%)记录符合高干预保真度的预设阈值。

结论

ED 临床医生可以以高度的保真度提供 BNI 干预措施,以增加预先护理计划的对话。需要进一步研究该干预措施在更广泛的患者群体中的疗效。

相似文献

1
4
Empower Seriously Ill Older Adults to Formulate Their Goals for Medical Care in the Emergency Department.
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):267-273. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0360. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
5
Feasibility of a Serious Illness Communication Program for Pediatric Advance Care Planning.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424626. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24626.
7
Goals-of-Care Conversations for Older Adults With Serious Illness in the Emergency Department: Challenges and Opportunities.
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Nurses.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):650-655. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0398. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions.
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jan;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/08258597221149402. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

3
Instruments for Value Elucidation in Older Adults in Clinical Practice-A Scoping Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr;73(4):1267-1287. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19356. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
5
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.
6
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
7
Geriatric End-of-Life Screening Tool Prediction of 6-Month Mortality in Older Patients.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2414213. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14213.
9
Motivational interviews to enhance advance care plans in older adults: systematic review.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2293-e2301. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004424.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Pilot Testing of a Motivational Interview for Engagement in Advance Care Planning.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;21(7):897-898. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0095.
5
Effectiveness of SBIRT for Alcohol Use Disorders in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1143-1152. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.7.34373. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
7
8
A Systematic Intervention To Improve Serious Illness Communication In Primary Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1258-1264. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0219.
9
A Research Agenda for Communication Between Health Care Professionals and Patients Living With Serious Illness.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1361-1366. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005.
10
End-of-Life Care Planning in Accountable Care Organizations: Associations with Organizational Characteristics and Capabilities.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1662-1681. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12720. Epub 2017 May 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验