Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hessing Stiftung, Augsburg, Germany.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;45(8):620-627. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101435. Epub 2020 May 28.
Safety and effectiveness are mandatory requirements for any technique of regional anesthesia and can only be met by clinicians who appropriately understand all relevant anatomical details. Anatomical texts written for anesthetists may oversimplify the facts, presumably in an effort to reconcile extreme complexity with a need to educate as many users as possible. When it comes to techniques as common as upper-extremity blocks, the need for customized anatomical literature is even greater, particularly because the complex anatomy of the brachial plexus has never been described for anesthetists with a focus placed on regional anesthesia. The authors have undertaken to close this gap by compiling a structured overview that is clinically oriented and tailored to the needs of regional anesthesia. They describe the anatomy of the brachial plexus (ventral rami, trunks, divisions, cords, and nerves) in relation to the topographical regions used for access (interscalene gap, posterior triangle of the neck, infraclavicular fossa, and axillary fossa) and discuss the (interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary) block procedures associated with these access regions. They indicate allowances to be made for anatomical variations and the topography of fascial anatomy, give recommendations for ultrasound imaging and needle guidance, and explain the risks of excessive volumes and misdirected spreading of local anesthetics in various anatomical contexts. It is hoped that clinicians will find this article to be a useful reference for decision-making, enabling them to select the most appropriate regional anesthetic technique in any given situation, and to correctly judge the risks involved, whenever they prepare patients for a specific upper-limb surgical procedure.
对于任何区域麻醉技术,安全性和有效性都是强制性要求,只有适当了解所有相关解剖细节的临床医生才能满足这些要求。为麻醉师编写的解剖学文本可能过于简化事实,大概是为了努力协调极端复杂性与教育尽可能多的用户的需求。对于像上肢阻滞这样常见的技术,对定制解剖学文献的需求甚至更大,特别是因为臂丛的复杂解剖结构从未以关注区域麻醉为重点向麻醉师描述过。作者通过编写一份以临床为导向且符合区域麻醉需求的结构化概述来填补这一空白。他们描述了臂丛(腹侧支、干、分支、索和神经)的解剖结构与用于进入的解剖区域(肌间沟、颈后三角、锁骨下窝和腋窝)之间的关系,并讨论了与这些进入区域相关的(肌间沟、锁骨上、锁骨下和腋窝)阻滞程序。他们表示允许对解剖变异和筋膜解剖的局部解剖进行调整,为超声成像和针引导提供建议,并解释在各种解剖情况下局部麻醉剂的过量容量和错误扩散的风险。希望临床医生将本文视为决策的有用参考,使他们能够在任何特定情况下选择最合适的区域麻醉技术,并在为特定上肢手术准备患者时正确判断所涉及的风险。