• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估双路径平台(DPP) VetTB 检测试剂盒在獾中检测牛分枝杆菌感染的效果。

Evaluation of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) VetTB assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers.

机构信息

Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.

Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jul;180:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105005. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105005
PMID:32473415
Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, represents a major animal health issue. In the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, European badgers (Meles meles) have been shown to act as a reservoir of M. bovis infection, hindering the eradication of bTB in livestock. The availability of suitable diagnostic assays, particularly those that may be applied in a "trap-side" setting, would facilitate the implementation of a wider range of disease control strategies. Here we evaluate the Dual Path Platform (DPP) VetTB assay, a lateral-flow type test for detecting antibodies to M. bovis antigens (MPB83 and ESAT-6/CFP-10). Both serum and whole blood were evaluated as diagnostic samples. Additionally, two methods were evaluated for interpretation of test results (qualitative interpretation by eye and quantitative measurement using an optical reader). The antibody response to MPB83 detected by the DPP VetTB assay increased significantly following experimental M. bovis infection of badgers, whilst the response to ESAT-6/CFP-10 showed no significant change. In sera from TB-free captive and naturally M. bovis infected wild badgers the MPB83 response exhibited a sensitivity of 55 % by eye and quantitative reader (95 % CI: 40-71 and 38-71, respectively), with slightly lower specificity when read by eye (93 % compared to 98 %; 95 % CI: 85-100 and 90-100, respectively). In whole blood, the DPP VetTB assay MPB83 response exhibited a sensitivity of 65 % (95 % CI: 50-80) when interpreted by eye and 53 % (95 % CI: 36-69) using quantitative values, whilst the specificity was 94 % and 98 % respectively (95 % CI: 88-100 and 90-100). Comparison with contemporaneous diagnostic test results from putatively naturally infected and TB-free badgers demonstrated varying levels of agreement. Using sera from naturally M. bovis infected and TB-free badgers, with post mortem confirmation of disease status, the DPP VetTB assay exhibited a sensitivity of 60 % (95 % CI: 41-77) when interpreted using quantitative values (specificity 95 %; 95 % CI: 76-100), and 67 % (95 % CI: 50-84) when read by eye (specificity 95 %; 95 % CI: 86-100). Further work is required to robustly characterize the DPP VetTB assay's performance in a wider selection of samples, and in the practical and epidemiological contexts in which it may be applied.

摘要

牛型结核(bTB)由牛分枝杆菌引起,是一个主要的动物健康问题。在英国和爱尔兰共和国,欧洲獾(Meles meles)已被证明是 M. bovis 感染的储存库,阻碍了家畜中 bTB 的根除。合适的诊断检测方法的可用性,特别是那些可在“陷阱边”设置中应用的方法,将有助于实施更广泛的疾病控制策略。在这里,我们评估了双路径平台(DPP) VetTB 检测,这是一种用于检测针对 M. bovis 抗原(MPB83 和 ESAT-6/CFP-10)的抗体的侧向流动型检测。血清和全血均被评估为诊断样本。此外,还评估了两种方法来解释检测结果(通过肉眼进行定性解释和使用光学读取器进行定量测量)。在实验性 M. bovis 感染獾后,DPP VetTB 检测检测到的针对 MPB83 的抗体反应显著增加,而针对 ESAT-6/CFP-10 的反应没有明显变化。在来自无结核病的圈养和自然感染 M. bovis 的野生獾的血清中,通过肉眼和定量读取器观察到针对 MPB83 的反应的灵敏度分别为 55 %(95 % CI:40-71 和 38-71),而通过肉眼观察时的特异性略低(93 % 对 98 %;95 % CI:85-100 和 90-100)。在全血中,DPP VetTB 检测的 MPB83 反应通过肉眼观察的灵敏度为 65 %(95 % CI:50-80),使用定量值的灵敏度为 53 %(95 % CI:36-69),而特异性分别为 94 %和 98 %(95 % CI:88-100 和 90-100)。与同期疑似自然感染和无结核病的獾的诊断检测结果进行比较,显示出不同程度的一致性。使用来自自然感染 M. bovis 和无结核病的獾的血清,并通过死后确认疾病状态,使用定量值解释时,DPP VetTB 检测的灵敏度为 60 %(95 % CI:41-77)(特异性 95 %;95 % CI:76-100),通过肉眼观察的灵敏度为 67 %(95 % CI:50-84)(特异性 95 %;95 % CI:86-100)。需要进一步的工作来更严格地描述 DPP VetTB 检测在更广泛的样本选择以及可能应用的实际和流行病学背景下的性能。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) VetTB assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers.评估双路径平台(DPP) VetTB 检测试剂盒在獾中检测牛分枝杆菌感染的效果。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jul;180:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105005. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
2
Evaluating the application of the dual path platform VetTB test for badgers (Meles meles) in the test and vaccinate or remove (TVR) wildlife research intervention project in Northern Ireland.评估双路径平台 VetTB 检测在北爱尔兰的“检测和免疫或清除(TVR)”野生动物研究干预项目中用于獾(Meles meles)的应用。
Res Vet Sci. 2020 Jun;130:170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
3
The impact of BCG strains and repeat vaccinations on immunodiagnostic tests in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles).卡介苗菌株和重复接种对欧亚獾(Meles meles)免疫诊断检测的影响。
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 12;40(34):4972-4978. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.081. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Seroconversion against antigen MPB83 in badgers (Meles meles) vaccinated with multiple doses of BCG strain Sofia.在接种了多次 Sofia 株卡介苗的獾(Meles meles)中针对抗原 MPB83 的血清转化。
Res Vet Sci. 2022 Dec;149:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Rapid detection of serum antibody by dual-path platform VetTB assay in white-tailed deer infected with Mycobacterium bovis.利用双路径平台VetTB检测法快速检测感染牛分枝杆菌的白尾鹿血清抗体
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 Jun;20(6):907-11. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00120-13. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
6
Serologic responses correlate with current but not future bacterial shedding in badgers naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis.在自然感染牛分枝杆菌的獾中,血清学反应与当前而非未来的细菌脱落情况相关。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jul;69(4):1922-1932. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14181. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
A Bayesian analysis of a Test and Vaccinate or Remove study to control bovine tuberculosis in badgers (Meles meles).一项关于“检测与接种疫苗或捕杀”研究以控制獾(鼬獾)结核病的贝叶斯分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0246141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246141. eCollection 2021.
8
New serological platform for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in European badgers.用于检测欧洲獾体内抗结核分枝杆菌复合群抗体的新型血清学平台。
Vet Med Sci. 2019 Feb;5(1):61-69. doi: 10.1002/vms3.134. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Strong antibody responses to Mycobacterium bovis infection in domestic pigs and potential for reliable serodiagnostics.家猪对牛分枝杆菌感染的强烈抗体反应及可靠血清学诊断的可能性。
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2021 Jan;231:110161. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2020.110161. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
10
Mycobacterium bovis infection in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): the disease, pathogenesis, epidemiology and control.欧亚獾(Meles meles)中的牛分枝杆菌感染:疾病、发病机制、流行病学与防控
J Comp Pathol. 2011 Jan;144(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the DPP Vet TB assay in badgers using Bayesian latent class models.使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型评估獾中DPP兽医结核病检测的敏感性和特异性。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 4;20(3):e0313825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313825. eCollection 2025.
2
Bayesian accuracy estimates for diagnostic tests to detect tuberculosis in captive sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) and Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus) in Cambodia and Vietnam.用于检测柬埔寨和越南圈养马来熊(Helarctos malayanus)和亚洲黑熊(Ursus thibetanus)结核病的诊断检测的贝叶斯准确性估计。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0313007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313007. eCollection 2024.
3
Use of an expert elicitation methodology to compare welfare impacts of two approaches for blood sampling European badgers () in the field.
运用专家征询方法比较两种野外采集欧洲獾血液样本方法的福利影响。
Anim Welf. 2024 Mar 15;33:e17. doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.16. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of Antibody Tests for Infection in Pigs and Deer.猪和鹿感染抗体检测评估
Vet Sci. 2023 Jul 27;10(8):489. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10080489.
5
Experimental Infection of Captive Red Foxes () with .圈养赤狐()感染的实验研究。 你提供的原文中括号里内容缺失,请补充完整以便我能给出更准确的译文 。
Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 6;10(2):380. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020380.
6
Ten Years of Lateral Flow Immunoassay Technique Applications: Trends, Challenges and Future Perspectives.十年侧向流免疫分析技术应用:趋势、挑战与未来展望。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;21(15):5185. doi: 10.3390/s21155185.
7
Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in China during 2010-2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2010-2019 年中国奶牛结核病流行情况的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jun 17;15(6):e0009502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009502. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Review of Methods Used for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Captive and Free-Ranging Non-Bovid Species (2012-2020).圈养和自由放养的非牛科动物结核病诊断方法综述(2012 - 2020年)
Pathogens. 2021 May 11;10(5):584. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050584.
9
A Bayesian analysis of a Test and Vaccinate or Remove study to control bovine tuberculosis in badgers (Meles meles).一项关于“检测与接种疫苗或捕杀”研究以控制獾(鼬獾)结核病的贝叶斯分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0246141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246141. eCollection 2021.