• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种自动输血装置在儿科人群中的应用比较。

Comparison of three autotransfusion devices for utilization in the pediatric population.

机构信息

Department of Perfusion Services, Cardiac Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Perfusion. 2021 Jan;36(1):57-62. doi: 10.1177/0267659120921090. Epub 2020 May 30.

DOI:10.1177/0267659120921090
PMID:32475210
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A device that may help attenuate the amount of homologous blood product given to pediatric cardiac surgical patients is the autotransfusion device. Three separate autotransfusion devices were selected for evaluation. The Sorin Xtra, Fresenius Continuous Autotransfusion System Plus (CATS), and the Fresenius Continuous Autotransfusion System Smart (CATSmart) were evaluated based on the mechanical processes of each device, hematocrit value of the salvaged packed red cell product, time of processing, and the advantageous accessories with each device.

METHODS

Each of the autotransfusion devices were used to collect salvageable blood from the surgical field as well as to process residual blood from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit after decannulation. The cell salvage process was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use and the recommended settings for processing and washing. The Sorin Xtra device had the 55 mL bowl set up for all cases, while the Fresenius continuous autotransfusion systems utilized the standard disposable for each device.

RESULTS

Each cell salvage device was employed during 30 pediatric cardiac surgery procedures, and data for each device, was broken down into four groups based on patient weight (0-10, 10-20, 20-40, and >40 kg). For all patient sizes, the Sorin Xtra tended to produce the greatest volume of cell saver product (55-825 mL) as compared to the CATS and CATSmart devices (7-550 mL and 0-860 mL, respectively). The Continuous Autotransfusion System Smart tended to produce the highest hematocrit product, ranging from 44 to 81%.

DISCUSSION

Through this evaluation, it was determined the continuous autotransfusion systems provided the highest hematocrit with the lowest recovered packed red cell volume, while the Sorin Xtra packed red cell product showed to have a lower hematocrit with a larger packed red cell volume. Each device proved effective within our pediatric population.

摘要

简介

一种可能有助于减少儿科心脏外科患者给予同源血液制品量的设备是自体输血装置。选择了三种独立的自体输血设备进行评估。根据每个设备的机械过程、回收的浓缩红细胞产品的血细胞比容值、处理时间以及每个设备的附加优势附件,对 Sorin Xtra、费森尤斯连续自动输血系统加(CATS)和费森尤斯连续自动输血系统智能(CATSmart)进行了评估。

方法

每个自体输血设备都用于从手术部位收集可回收的血液,并处理体外循环脱管后的剩余血液。细胞回收过程按照制造商的使用说明和处理及清洗的推荐设置进行。Sorin Xtra 设备使用所有情况下的 55ml 碗,而费森尤斯连续自动输血系统则为每个设备使用标准一次性用品。

结果

每个细胞回收设备都在 30 例儿科心脏手术中使用,每个设备的数据按患者体重(0-10、10-20、20-40 和>40kg)分为四组。对于所有患者体型,Sorin Xtra 设备产生的细胞保存产品量最大(55-825ml),而 CATS 和 CATSmart 设备的产品量分别为 7-550ml 和 0-860ml。连续自动输血系统 Smart 产生的血细胞比容产品最高,范围从 44%到 81%。

讨论

通过这项评估,确定连续自动输血系统提供了最高的血细胞比容,同时回收的浓缩红细胞量最低,而 Sorin Xtra 浓缩红细胞产品的血细胞比容较低,但浓缩红细胞量较大。每个设备在我们的儿科人群中都被证明是有效的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three autotransfusion devices for utilization in the pediatric population.三种自动输血装置在儿科人群中的应用比较。
Perfusion. 2021 Jan;36(1):57-62. doi: 10.1177/0267659120921090. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Evaluation of the minimum volume of salvage blood required for the successful use of two different autotransfusion devices.评估成功使用两种不同自体输血装置所需的最低回收血量。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Mar;25(3):258-64. doi: 10.1111/pan.12535. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
In Vitro Evaluation of the Fresenius Kabi CATSmart Autotransfusion System.费森尤斯卡比CATSmart自体输血系统的体外评估
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2017 Jun;49(2):107-111.
4
The impact of bowl size, program setup, and blood hematocrit on the performance of a discontinuous autotransfusion system.碗的大小、程序设置和血液血细胞比容对间断性自体输血系统性能的影响。
Transfusion. 2017 Mar;57(3):589-598. doi: 10.1111/trf.13954. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Cell salvage using the continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart - an observational bicenter technical evaluation.使用连续自体输血装置CATSmart进行细胞回收——一项双中心观察性技术评估。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0651-0.
6
Performance of a new-generation continuous autotransfusion device including fat removal and consequences for quality controls.新一代连续自体输血装置的性能,包括脂肪去除及质量控制的影响
Transfus Med. 2017 Aug;27(4):292-299. doi: 10.1111/tme.12421. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Clinical evaluation of the Sorin Xtra(R) Autotransfusion System.索林Xtra(R)自体输血系统的临床评估。
Perfusion. 2012 Jul;27(4):278-83. doi: 10.1177/0267659112442222. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
Reinfusate Heparin Concentrations Produced by Two Autotransfusion Systems.两种自体输血系统产生的回输液肝素浓度
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):90-98. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
9
Washing of banked blood by three different blood salvage devices.三种不同的血液回收装置对保存血的洗涤。
Transfusion. 2013 May;53(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03853.x. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
10
Processing of small volumes in blood salvage devices.血液回收装置中小容量血液的处理
Transfusion. 2014 Oct;54(10 Pt 2):2775-81. doi: 10.1111/trf.12765. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematocrit and total protein elimination as quality control parameters of cell salvage.血细胞比容和总蛋白清除率作为细胞回收质量控制参数。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025 Jun;57(2):89-95. doi: 10.1051/ject/2025013. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Comparative evaluation of two autotransfusion devices in a 72h survival swine model of surgically induced controlled splenic bleeding.两种自体输血装置在手术诱导的可控性脾出血72小时存活猪模型中的比较评估
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322568. eCollection 2025.
3
The effectiveness of cell salvage in extracorporeal circulation surgeries in relation to use of health resources after use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
体外循环手术中自体血回输在使用后与卫生资源利用相关的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 27;10(9):e30459. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30459. eCollection 2024 May 15.