• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多组分干预措施减少住院期间的久坐时间:一项准实验性 pilot 研究。

A multicomponent intervention to decrease sedentary time during hospitalization: a quasi-experimental pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jul;34(7):901-915. doi: 10.1177/0269215520920662. Epub 2020 May 31.

DOI:10.1177/0269215520920662
PMID:32476455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7472834/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a multicomponent intervention to decrease sedentary time during and shortly after hospitalization.

DESIGN

This is a quasi-experimental pilot study comparing outcomes in patients admitted before and after the implementation of the intervention.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Participants were adult patients undergoing elective organ transplantation or vascular surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

In the control phase, patients received usual care, whereas in the intervention phase, patients also received a multicomponent intervention to decrease sedentary time. The intervention comprised eight elements: paper and digital information, an exercise movie, an activity planner, a pedometer and Fitbit Flex™, a personal activity coach and an individualized digital training program.

MEASURES

Measures of feasiblity were the self-reported use of the intervention components (yes/no) and satisfaction (low-high = 0-10). Main outcome measure was the median % of sedentary time measured by an accelerometer worn during hospitalization and 7-14 days thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 42 controls (mean age = 59 years, 62% male) and 52 intervention patients (58 years, 52%) were included. The exercise movie, paper information and Fitbit Flex were the three most frequently used components, with highest satisfaction scores for the fitbit, paper information, exercise movie and digital training. Median sedentary time decreased from 99.6% to 95.7% and 99.3% to 91.0% between Days 1 and 6 in patients admitted in the control and intervention phases, respectively. The difference at Day 6 reached statistical significance (difference = 41 min/day,  = 0.01). No differences were seen after discharge.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary time appeared feasible and may be effective during but not directly after hospitalization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一项多组分干预措施在住院期间和出院后不久减少久坐时间的可行性和初步效果。

设计

这是一项比较干预措施实施前后患者结局的准实验性试点研究。

设置

研究在一所大学医院进行。

受试者

接受择期器官移植或血管手术的成年患者。

干预措施

在对照阶段,患者接受常规护理,而在干预阶段,患者还接受了一项多组分干预措施以减少久坐时间。该干预措施包括八项内容:纸质和数字信息、运动电影、活动计划、计步器和 Fitbit Flex™、个人活动教练和个性化数字培训计划。

测量

可行性测量指标为患者自我报告的干预措施组件使用情况(是/否)和满意度(低-高=0-10)。主要结局测量指标为住院期间和出院后 7-14 天佩戴加速度计测量的久坐时间中位数百分比。

结果

共纳入 42 例对照患者(平均年龄=59 岁,62%为男性)和 52 例干预患者(58 岁,52%)。运动电影、纸质信息和 Fitbit Flex 是使用最多的三个组件,Fitbit、纸质信息、运动电影和数字培训的满意度得分最高。在对照和干预阶段入院的患者中,第 1 天至第 6 天期间,中位数久坐时间从 99.6%分别降至 95.7%和 99.3%至 91.0%。第 6 天的差异具有统计学意义(差异=41 分钟/天,=0.01)。出院后没有差异。

结论

实施多组分干预措施以减少久坐时间似乎是可行的,并且在住院期间可能有效,但在出院后直接应用可能无效。

相似文献

1
A multicomponent intervention to decrease sedentary time during hospitalization: a quasi-experimental pilot study.多组分干预措施减少住院期间的久坐时间:一项准实验性 pilot 研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jul;34(7):901-915. doi: 10.1177/0269215520920662. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Ecological Momentary Intervention to Replace Sedentary Time With Physical Activity to Improve Executive Function in Midlife and Older Latino Adults: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.生态瞬时干预取代久坐时间的身体活动,以改善中年和老年拉丁裔成年人的执行功能:试验性随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 5;26:e55079. doi: 10.2196/55079.
3
'Walk this way': results from a pilot randomised controlled trial of a health coaching intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity in people with serious mental illness.“这样走”:一项健康教练干预减少严重精神疾病患者久坐行为和增加身体活动的试点随机对照试验结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2274-5.
4
'Walk This Way' - a pilot of a health coaching intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase low intensity exercise in people with serious mental illness: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.《就这样走》——一项健康指导干预试验,旨在减少严重精神疾病患者的久坐行为并增加其低强度运动:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1660-2.
5
Ban Bedcentricity: A Multifaceted Innovation to Reduce Sedentary Behavior of Patients During the Hospital Stay.摒弃以床为中心的观念:一种多方面的创新,以减少患者住院期间的久坐行为。
Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 1;101(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab054.
6
A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐时间的行为改变干预措施:一项随机对照试验的方案。
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):182. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 16.
7
A scoping review of interventions using accelerometers to measure physical activity or sedentary behaviour during hospitalization.使用加速度计在住院期间测量身体活动或久坐行为的干预措施的范围综述。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Sep;34(9):1157-1172. doi: 10.1177/0269215520932965. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Effect of Exercise Intervention on Functional Decline in Very Elderly Patients During Acute Hospitalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.运动干预对急性住院超高龄患者功能下降的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4869.
9
Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a text message-enhanced clinical exercise rehabilitation intervention for increasing 'whole-of-day' activity in people living with and beyond cancer.短信增强型临床运动康复干预对提高癌症患者和康复期人群“全天”活动量的可行性、可接受性和疗效。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(Suppl 2):542. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6767-4.
10
Effect of a Behavioral Intervention Strategy on Sustained Change in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The IDES_2 Randomized Clinical Trial.行为干预策略对 2 型糖尿病患者体力活动和久坐行为持续改变的影响:IDES_2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):880-890. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0922.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring postures and motions of hospitalized patients using sensor technology: a scoping review.使用传感器技术监测住院患者的姿势和运动:范围综述。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2399963. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2399963. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Interventions Using Wearable Activity Trackers to Improve Patient Physical Activity and Other Outcomes in Adults Who Are Hospitalized: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.使用可穿戴活动追踪器干预以改善住院成人的患者身体活动和其他结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318478. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18478.
3
Rapid Improvements in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Immediately Following Hospital Discharge.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of physical interventions on physical performance and physical activity in older patients during hospitalization: a systematic review.物理干预对住院老年患者身体机能和身体活动的影响:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 23;18(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0965-2.
2
Effect of Hospitalizations on Physical Activity Patterns in Mobility-Limited Older Adults.住院对行动受限的老年患者体力活动模式的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):261-268. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15631. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
3
Additional structured physical activity does not improve walking in older people (>60years) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation: a randomised trial.
急性心肌梗死后患者出院后身体活动和久坐行为的迅速改善。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e028700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028700. Epub 2023 May 9.
额外的结构化身体活动并不能改善接受住院康复治疗的老年人(>60 岁)的步行能力:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2018 Oct;64(4):237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
What is Important in E-health Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation? A Survey Study among Patients, Informal Caregivers and Health Professionals.电子健康干预对中风康复的重要性是什么?一项针对患者、非正式护理人员和健康专业人员的调查研究。
Int J Telerehabil. 2018 Aug 3;10(1):15-28. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2018.6247. eCollection 2018 Spring.
5
Effectiveness of a Blended Physical Therapist Intervention in People With Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, or Both: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.混合式物理治疗师干预对髋关节炎、膝关节炎或两者并存患者的疗效:一项聚类随机对照试验。
Phys Ther. 2018 Jul 1;98(7):560-570. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy045.
6
Adherence of stroke patients with an online brain training program: the role of health professionals' support.中风患者对在线脑训练项目的依从性:健康专业人员支持的作用。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jul;25(5):359-365. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1459362. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Physical activity during hospitalization: Activities and preferences of adults versus older adults.住院期间的身体活动:成人与老年人的活动和偏好。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;35(10):975-985. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1460429. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Physical activity among hospitalised older people: insights from upper and lower limb accelerometry.住院老年人的身体活动:来自上肢和下肢加速度计的见解。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Nov;30(11):1363-1369. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-0930-0. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Assessment of Physical Activity of Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review.评估住院老年人的身体活动:系统评价。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(3):377-386. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0931-2.
10
Blended Interventions to Change Behavior in Patients With Chronic Somatic Disorders: Systematic Review.改变慢性躯体疾病患者行为的综合干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 21;19(12):e418. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8108.