Smedema Jan-Peter, van Geuns Robert-Jan, Truter Rene, Mayosi Bongani M, Crijns Harry J G M
Departments of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2017;34(4):307-314. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v34i4.5715. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
To review the value of delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CECMR) in differentiating patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from those with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial infarctions. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) accurately delineates myocardial necrosis or fibrosis. The pattern of LGE in ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial disease is different, and might be helpful in distinguishing CS from ischemic disease. The CECMR studies of 30 patients with CS were compared to those performed in 30 consecutive infarct patients, who had been managed with primary coronary interventions, and 10 healthy controls. Two experienced blinded observers classified patients by assessing the distribution of LGE. LV LGE was present in 29/30 CS (mean 3.8 segments, range 0-12), all infarct (mean 4.3 segments, range 0-9), and none of the patients in the control group. The amount of LV LGE did not differ significantly between CS and infarct patients (19 ± 11% and 19 ± 12%, P= 0.8). The CS group exhibited a predominantly patchy, 3 layer LGE (P = 0.01), whereas confluent transmural LGE (P = 0.04) with a vascular distribution (P < 0.001) was prevalent in the infarct group. Significantly more RV LGE (P = 0.01) and dilation (P = 0.02) were found in the CS group. The two observers classified patients correctly as CS in 72% and 83% of cases, as ischemic in nature in 77% and 80% of cases, and as normal in 90% and 100% respectively. Gadolinium CMR was helpful in differentiating patients with CS from patients with ischemic heart disease and previous myocardial infarctions. In a subgroup of ischemic patients the pattern of LGE was atypical, and suggestive of non-ischemic etiology. .
回顾延迟对比增强心脏磁共振成像(CECMR)在鉴别心脏结节病(CS)患者与冠状动脉疾病和近期心肌梗死患者中的价值。钆剂延迟强化(LGE)能准确勾勒出心肌坏死或纤维化情况。缺血性和非缺血性心肌疾病中LGE的模式不同,这可能有助于区分CS与缺血性疾病。将30例CS患者的CECMR研究结果与30例接受冠状动脉介入治疗的连续梗死患者以及10例健康对照者的研究结果进行比较。两名经验丰富的不知情观察者通过评估LGE的分布对患者进行分类。29/30例CS患者存在左心室LGE(平均3.8节段,范围0 - 12),所有梗死患者均存在(平均4.3节段,范围0 - 9),而对照组患者均无。CS组和梗死组患者左心室LGE量无显著差异(分别为19±11%和19±12%,P = 0.8)。CS组主要表现为斑片状、三层LGE(P = 0.01),而梗死组以融合性透壁LGE(P = 0.04)伴血管分布(P < 0.001)为主。CS组右心室LGE(P = 0.01)和扩张(P = 0.02)明显更多。两名观察者分别在72%和83%的病例中将患者正确分类为CS,在77%和80%的病例中正确分类为缺血性,在90%和100%的病例中正确分类为正常。钆剂CMR有助于区分CS患者与缺血性心脏病和既往心肌梗死患者。在一部分缺血性患者中,LGE模式不典型,提示非缺血性病因。