• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可穿戴设备的普遍认知评估工具:设计、实施和评估研究。

The Ubiquitous Cognitive Assessment Tool for Smartwatches: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.

机构信息

Digital Health Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Copenhagen Center for Health Technology, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 1;8(6):e17506. doi: 10.2196/17506.

DOI:10.2196/17506
PMID:32478664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7296405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive functioning plays a significant role in individuals' mental health, since fluctuations in memory, attention, and executive functions influence their daily task performance. Existing digital cognitive assessment tools cannot be administered in the wild and their test sets are not brief enough to capture frequent fluctuations throughout the day. The ubiquitous availability of mobile and wearable devices may allow their incorporation into a suitable platform for real-world cognitive assessment.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were threefold: (1) to evaluate a smartwatch-based tool for the assessment of cognitive performance, (2) to investigate the usability of this tool, and (3) to understand participants' perceptions regarding the application of a smartwatch in cognitive assessment.

METHODS

We built the Ubiquitous Cognitive Assessment Tool (UbiCAT) on a smartwatch-based platform. UbiCAT implements three cognitive tests-an Arrow test, a Letter test, and a Color test-adapted from the two-choice reaction-time, N-back, and Stroop tests, respectively. These tests were designed together with domain experts. We evaluated the UbiCAT test measures against standard computer-based tests with 21 healthy adults by applying statistical analyses significant at the 95% level. Usability testing for each UbiCAT app was performed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire. The NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) questionnaire was used to measure cognitive workload during the N-back test. Participants rated perceived discomfort of wearing a smartwatch during the tests using a 7-point Likert scale. Upon finishing the experiment, an interview was conducted with each participant. The interviews were transcribed and semantic analysis was performed to group the findings.

RESULTS

Pearson correlation analysis between the total correct responses obtained from the UbiCAT and the computer-based tests revealed a significant strong correlation (r=.78, P<.001). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant effect of the N-back difficulty level on the participants' performance measures. The study also demonstrated usability ratings above 4 out of 5 in terms of aesthetics, functionality, and information. Low discomfort (<3 out of 7) was reported by our participants after using the UbiCAT. Seven themes were extracted from the transcripts of the interviews conducted with our participants.

CONCLUSIONS

UbiCAT is a smartwatch-based tool that assesses three key cognitive domains. Usability ratings showed that participants were engaged with the UbiCAT tests and did not feel any discomfort. The majority of the participants were interested in using the UbiCAT, although some preferred computer-based tests, which might be due to the widespread use of personal computers. The UbiCAT can be administered in the wild with mentally ill patients to assess their attention, working memory, and executive function.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/81129a671554/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/b737ecfcfa97/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/0104acd5c16d/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/1138c95a94ed/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/51d9e61e8818/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/3fd691cace53/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/086b188b81fa/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/65682cf6f63a/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/5a2f63a13a1e/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/1678238c2584/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/9299504f4776/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/7af41de1ae1f/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/81129a671554/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/b737ecfcfa97/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/0104acd5c16d/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/1138c95a94ed/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/51d9e61e8818/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/3fd691cace53/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/086b188b81fa/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/65682cf6f63a/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/5a2f63a13a1e/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/1678238c2584/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/9299504f4776/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/7af41de1ae1f/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d195/7296405/81129a671554/mhealth_v8i6e17506_fig12.jpg
摘要

背景

认知功能在个体的心理健康中起着重要作用,因为记忆、注意力和执行功能的波动会影响他们的日常任务表现。现有的数字认知评估工具不能在野外使用,而且它们的测试集不够简短,无法捕捉一整天的频繁波动。移动和可穿戴设备的普遍可用性可能允许将其纳入适合现实世界认知评估的平台。

目的

本研究旨在评估一种基于智能手表的认知性能评估工具,调查该工具的可用性,并了解参与者对智能手表在认知评估中应用的看法。

方法

我们在基于智能手表的平台上构建了通用认知评估工具(UbiCAT)。UbiCAT 实现了三种认知测试-箭头测试、字母测试和颜色测试-分别改编自二择一反应时、N 回测试和斯特鲁普测试。这些测试是与领域专家一起设计的。我们通过应用统计学分析,将 UbiCAT 测试指标与 21 名健康成年人的标准计算机测试进行了对比,该分析在 95%的水平上具有显著意义。使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)问卷对每个 UbiCAT 应用程序进行了可用性测试。在 N 回测试期间,使用 NASA-TLX(任务负荷指数)问卷测量认知工作量。参与者使用 7 分制李克特量表对佩戴智能手表时的感知不适进行评分。完成实验后,对每位参与者进行了访谈。访谈记录并进行语义分析以分组发现。

结果

UbiCAT 和基于计算机的测试的总正确反应之间的 Pearson 相关分析显示出显著的强相关性(r=.78,P<.001)。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)显示,N 回难度水平对参与者的表现有显著影响。研究还表明,在美学、功能和信息方面,用户对 UbiCAT 的评价均高于 4 分(满分 5 分)。我们的参与者报告使用 UbiCAT 后不适感较低(<3 分)。从对参与者进行的访谈记录中提取了 7 个主题。

结论

UbiCAT 是一种基于智能手表的工具,可评估三个关键认知领域。可用性评分表明,参与者参与了 UbiCAT 测试,并且没有感到任何不适。大多数参与者对使用 UbiCAT 感兴趣,尽管一些参与者更喜欢基于计算机的测试,这可能是因为个人计算机的广泛使用。可以在野外对精神病患者使用 UbiCAT 来评估他们的注意力、工作记忆和执行功能。

相似文献

1
The Ubiquitous Cognitive Assessment Tool for Smartwatches: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.可穿戴设备的普遍认知评估工具:设计、实施和评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 1;8(6):e17506. doi: 10.2196/17506.
2
Perception of Older Adults Toward Smartwatch Technology for Assessing Pain and Related Patient-Reported Outcomes: Pilot Study.老年人对用于评估疼痛和相关患者报告结局的智能手表技术的认知:初步研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 26;7(3):e10044. doi: 10.2196/10044.
3
Satisfaction, Usability, and Compliance With the Use of Smartwatches for Ecological Momentary Assessment of Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms in Older Adults: Usability Study.老年人使用智能手表对膝骨关节炎症状进行生态瞬时评估的满意度、可用性和依从性:可用性研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Jul 14;4(3):e24553. doi: 10.2196/24553.
4
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
5
The Internet-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool: System Design and Feasibility Study.基于互联网的认知评估工具:系统设计与可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jul 26;3(3):e13898. doi: 10.2196/13898.
6
Mobile Assessment of Acute Effects of Marijuana on Cognitive Functioning in Young Adults: Observational Study.移动评估大麻对年轻人认知功能的急性影响:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 10;8(3):e16240. doi: 10.2196/16240.
7
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
A Mobile App Delivering a Gamified Battery of Cognitive Tests Designed for Repeated Play (OU Brainwave): App Design and Cohort Study.一款提供一系列专为重复游玩设计的游戏化认知测试的移动应用程序(OU 脑电波):应用程序设计与队列研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Oct 30;6(4):e10519. doi: 10.2196/10519.
9
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a measure of cognitive workload.呼吸窦性心律失常作为认知工作量的衡量指标。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jan;83(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
Smartwatch-Based Interventions for People With Dementia: User-Centered Design Approach.基于智能手表的痴呆症患者干预措施:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jun 7;7:e50107. doi: 10.2196/50107.

引用本文的文献

1
The most used questionnaires for evaluating the usability of robots and smart wearables: A scoping review.评估机器人和智能可穿戴设备可用性最常用的问卷:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 9;10:20552076241237384. doi: 10.1177/20552076241237384. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.评估可穿戴设备及其配套移动健康应用程序所使用的属性、方法和框架:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Apr 5;12:e52179. doi: 10.2196/52179.
3
The application of unmanned aerial vehicle oblique photography technology in online tourism design.

本文引用的文献

1
Wearable Technology for High-Frequency Cognitive and Mood Assessment in Major Depressive Disorder: Longitudinal Observational Study.用于重度抑郁症高频认知和情绪评估的可穿戴技术:纵向观察研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 18;6(11):e12814. doi: 10.2196/12814.
2
Longitudinal analysis of cognitive performances in recent-onset and late-life Bipolar Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.近期发病和老年期双相障碍认知表现的纵向分析:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Feb;22(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12841. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
3
The Internet-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool: System Design and Feasibility Study.
无人机倾斜摄影技术在在线旅游设计中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 7;18(9):e0289653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289653. eCollection 2023.
4
Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review.用于老年人身体活动和健康监测的可穿戴设备:一项批判性综述。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;6(2):38. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020038.
基于互联网的认知评估工具:系统设计与可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jul 26;3(3):e13898. doi: 10.2196/13898.
4
The validation of a new online cognitive assessment tool: The MyCognition Quotient.一种新的在线认知评估工具的验证:MyCognition Quotient。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1775. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1775. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Stability, reliability, and validity of the THINC-it screening tool for cognitive impairment in depression: A psychometric exploration in healthy volunteers.THINC-it 筛查工具评估抑郁患者认知障碍的稳定性、可靠性和有效性:健康志愿者的心理测量学探索。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;27(3):e1736. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1736. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
A SURVEY OF SMARTWATCHES IN REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING.远程健康监测中的智能手表调查
J Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Jun;2(1-2):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s41666-017-0012-7. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
7
Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of cognition in bipolar disorder: comparison with healthy controls and schizophrenia.双相障碍认知功能的纵向研究的荟萃分析:与健康对照和精神分裂症的比较。
Psychol Med. 2017 Dec;47(16):2753-2766. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001490. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
8
Cognitive Testing in People at Increased Risk of Dementia Using a Smartphone App: The iVitality Proof-of-Principle Study.使用智能手机应用程序对痴呆症高风险人群进行认知测试:iVitality原理验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 25;5(5):e68. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6939.
9
Applications for self-administered mobile cognitive assessments in clinical research: A systematic review.自我管理的移动认知评估在临床研究中的应用:系统评价。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;26(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1562. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Development and Testing of a Smartphone-Based Cognitive/Neuropsychological Evaluation System for Substance Abusers.一种用于药物滥用者的基于智能手机的认知/神经心理评估系统的开发与测试
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2016 Sep-Oct;48(4):288-94. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2016.1191093. Epub 2016 Jun 3.