• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么全膝关节置换术后需要再次干预?一项连续队列研究 1170 例手术。

Why Reintervention After Total Knee Arthroplasty Fails? A Consecutive Cohort of 1170 Surgeries.

机构信息

FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon France.

Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Windsor, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2550-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.043. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.043
PMID:32482477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze why contemporary reintervention after total knee arthroplasty (RiTKA) fails.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2010, from a multicenter cohort of 1170 RiTKAs, we assessed all failures of RiTKA requiring additional surgery. All indications for the index reintervention were included. The minimum follow-up period was 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 192 (16.4%) patients required additional surgery after RiTKA (re-reintervention). The mean follow-up period was 7.7 years. Mean age was 69.2 years. The mean time to re-reintervention was 9.6 months with 90.1% of rTKA failure occurring within the first two years. Infection was the main cause of new surgery after RiTKA (47.9%; n = 92/192). Other causes included extensor mechanism pathology (14.6%), stiffness (13.5%), pain (6.8%), aseptic loosening (5.2%), laxity (5.2%), periprosthetic fracture (3.6%), and wound pathology (3.1%). In four groups, the main indication for re-reintervention was recurrence of the pathology leading to the first reintervention: RiTKA for infection (59/355, 16.6%, P < .05), stiffness (18/174, 10.3%, P < .05), extensor mechanism failure (9/167, 5.4%, P < .05), and RiTKA for pain (4/137, 2.9%, P = .003). Global survival curve analysis found 87.9% survivorship without re-reintervention at one year and 83% at eight years.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary RiTKA failures mainly occur in the first two postoperative years. Infection is the main cause of failure in RiTKA. Recurrence of the initial pathology occurs in four groups of RiTKA and is the main indication for re-reintervention in these groups; infection (16.6%), stiffness (10.3%), extensor mechanism failure (5.4%), and pain (2.9%).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析为什么当代全膝关节置换术后再次干预(RiTKA)会失败。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月,我们对 1170 例接受 RiTKA 的多中心队列患者进行评估,所有需要进一步手术的 RiTKA 失败都被列入评估。所有的再次干预指征都包括在内。最小随访时间为 3 年。

结果

共有 192 例(16.4%)患者在 RiTKA 后需要再次手术(再次干预)。平均随访时间为 7.7 年。平均年龄为 69.2 岁。再次干预的平均时间为 9.6 个月,90.1%的 rTKA 失败发生在最初两年内。感染是 RiTKA 后新手术的主要原因(47.9%;n=92/192)。其他原因包括伸肌机制病理(14.6%)、僵硬(13.5%)、疼痛(6.8%)、无菌性松动(5.2%)、松弛(5.2%)、假体周围骨折(3.6%)和伤口病理(3.1%)。在四个组中,再次干预的主要指征是导致第一次干预的病理复发:RiTKA 治疗感染(59/355,16.6%,P<.05)、僵硬(18/174,10.3%,P<.05)、伸肌机制失败(9/167,5.4%,P<.05)和 RiTKA 治疗疼痛(4/137,2.9%,P=0.003)。全生存曲线分析发现,1 年时无再次干预的生存率为 87.9%,8 年时为 83%。

结论

当代 RiTKA 失败主要发生在术后的头两年。感染是 RiTKA 失败的主要原因。初始病理在四个 RiTKA 组中复发,是这些组再次干预的主要指征;感染(16.6%)、僵硬(10.3%)、伸肌机制失败(5.4%)和疼痛(2.9%)。

相似文献

1
Why Reintervention After Total Knee Arthroplasty Fails? A Consecutive Cohort of 1170 Surgeries.为什么全膝关节置换术后需要再次干预?一项连续队列研究 1170 例手术。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2550-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.043. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
Complications and failures of non-tumoral hinged total knee arthroplasty in primary and aseptic revision surgery: A review of 290 cases.非肿瘤铰链式全膝关节置换术在初次和无菌翻修手术中的并发症和失败:290 例回顾。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102875. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102875. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
4
Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.初次后稳定型全膝关节置换术的当代失败病因
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):647-652. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0617.R3.
5
Periprosthetic Infection: Major Cause of Early Failure of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染:初次及翻修全膝关节置换早期失败的主要原因
J Knee Surg. 2019 Oct;32(10):941-946. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672203. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
6
Revision after early aseptic failures in primary total knee arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后早期无菌性失败后的翻修手术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Mar;17(3):248-53. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0667-y. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
7
Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up.翻修全膝关节置换术后后稳定型与约束型髁间关节假体的优越存活率:短期随访的回顾性对比分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3012-3017.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013-2016) and 68 cases (1991-1998).自 2000 年以来,全膝关节置换术的修订频率和原因是否发生了变化?对同一医院的两个队列进行比较:255 例(2013-2016 年)和 68 例(1991-1998 年)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Long-Term Implant Survivorship and Modes of Failure in Simultaneous Concurrent Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.同期双侧全膝关节置换术后的长期假体存活率和失败模式。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
10
Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: 1 in 3 Risk of Re-Revision by 10 Years.50 岁以下患者的当代全膝关节翻修术:10 年内再次翻修的风险为 1/3。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S266-S270. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection Based on the Korean National Registry between 2011 and 2019.基于2011年至2019年韩国国家注册登记数据的人工关节周围感染后翻修全膝关节置换术的负担
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(4):631-638. doi: 10.4055/cios24253. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
Kinematic Alignment of Failed Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Restored Constitutional Limb Alignment and Improved Clinical Outcomes: A Case Report of 7 Patients.失败的机械对线全膝关节置换术的运动学对线恢复了肢体正常对线并改善了临床结果:7例患者的病例报告
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 28;12(11):1780. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111780.
3
Revision arthroplasty after unicompartimental knee arthroplasty.
单间室膝关节置换术后翻修术。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Nov 12;16(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02767-x.
4
Condylar constrained knee prosthesis and rotating hinge prosthesis for revision total knee arthroplasty for mechanical failure have not the same indications and same results.用于机械性失效的翻修全膝关节置换术的髁限制型膝关节假体和旋转铰链式假体具有不同的适应症和不同的结果。
SICOT J. 2021;7:45. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021046. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Recent trends in revision knee arthroplasty in Germany.德国膝关节翻修手术的最新趋势。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94988-7.
6
Antibiotics in Bone Cements Used for Prosthesis Fixation: An Efficient Way to Prevent and Prosthetic Joint Infection.用于假体固定的骨水泥中的抗生素:预防假体周围感染的有效方法
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 20;7:576231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.576231. eCollection 2020.