Suppr超能文献

尽管间隔一次阴性结肠镜检查,但筛查结肠镜检查中的高危腺瘤仍可预测未来的高危腺瘤。

High-Risk Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy Remain Predictive of Future High-Risk Adenomas Despite an Intervening Negative Colonoscopy.

机构信息

Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;115(8):1275-1282. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000677.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Limited data inform the current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines, which suggest a shortened interval to third colonoscopy after a negative second examination if high-risk adenomas (HRA) were present on the initial screening colonoscopy. Therefore, we examined the risk of HRA at third colonoscopy stratified by findings on 2 previous examinations in a prospective screening colonoscopy cohort of US veterans.

METHODS

We identified participants who had 3 or more colonoscopies from CSP#380. We examined the risk of HRA on the third examination based on findings from the previous 2 examinations. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for multiple covariates.

RESULTS

HRA were found at the third examination in 114 (12.8%) of 891 participants. Those with HRA on both previous examinations had the greatest incidence of HRA at third examination (14/56, 25.0%). Compared with those with no adenomas on both previous examinations, participants with HRA on the first examination remained at significantly increased risk for HRA at the third examination at 3 years after a negative second examination (odds ratio [OR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-9.08), 5 years (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.49-6.61), and 7 years (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.08-7.74).

DISCUSSION

In a screening population, HRA on the first examination identified individuals who remained at increased risk for HRA at the third examination, even after a negative second examination. This finding supports current colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines, which suggest a shortened, 5-year time interval to third colonoscopy after a negative second examination if high-risk findings were present on the baseline examination.

摘要

简介

目前的息肉切除后监测指南所依据的数据有限,如果在初始筛查结肠镜检查中发现高危腺瘤(HRA),则建议在第二次阴性检查后缩短第三次结肠镜检查的间隔时间。因此,我们在美国退伍军人的前瞻性筛查结肠镜检查队列中,根据前两次检查的结果,研究了第三次结肠镜检查时出现 HRA 的风险。

方法

我们从 CSP#380 中确定了进行了 3 次或更多次结肠镜检查的参与者。我们根据前两次检查的结果,检查了第三次检查中出现 HRA 的风险。使用多变量逻辑回归来调整多种协变量。

结果

在 891 名参与者中,有 114 名(12.8%)在第三次检查中发现了 HRA。在前两次检查中均发现 HRA 的患者,第三次检查中 HRA 的发生率最高(14/56,25.0%)。与前两次检查均无腺瘤的患者相比,在第二次检查阴性后 3 年、5 年和 7 年,首次检查中存在 HRA 的患者第三次检查中仍存在 HRA 的风险显著增加(优势比[OR]3.41,95%置信区间[CI]1.28-9.08)、5 年(OR 3.14,95% CI 1.49-6.61)和 7 年(OR 2.89,95% CI 1.08-7.74)。

讨论

在筛查人群中,首次检查中出现 HRA 可确定即使在第二次检查阴性后,仍存在发生 HRA 的风险增加的个体。这一发现支持当前的结直肠癌监测指南,即如果基线检查中存在高危发现,建议在第二次阴性检查后,将第三次结肠镜检查的时间间隔缩短至 5 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验