Suppr超能文献

素食主义和纯素食主义与心理健康和认知结果的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Vegetarianism and veganism compared with mental health and cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

GENUD (Growth, Exercise, NUtrition and Development) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Nutr Rev. 2021 Mar 9;79(4):361-381. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa030.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Vegetarian and vegan diets are increasing in popularity. Although they provide beneficial health effects, they may also lead to nutritional deficiencies. Cognitive impairment and mental health disorders have a high economic burden.

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between vegan or vegetarian diets and cognitive and mental health.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Proquest databases were examined from inception to July 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Original observational or interventional human studies of vegan/vegetarian diets were selected independently by 2 authors.

DATA EXTRACTION

Raw means and standard deviations were used as continuous outcomes, while numbers of events were used as categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1249 publications identified, 13 were included, with 17 809 individuals in total. No significant association was found between diet and the continuous depression score, stress, well-being, or cognitive impairment. Vegans/vegetarians were at increased risk for depression (odds ratio = 2.142; 95%CI, 1.105-4.148) and had lower anxiety scores (mean difference = -0.847; 95%CI, -1.677 to -0.018). Heterogeneity was large, and thus subgroup analyses showed numerous differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Vegan or vegetarian diets were related to a higher risk of depression and lower anxiety scores, but no differences for other outcomes were found. Subgroup analyses of anxiety showed a higher risk of anxiety, mainly in participants under 26 years of age and in studies with a higher quality. More studies with better overall quality are needed to make clear positive or negative associations.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018097204.

摘要

背景

素食和纯素饮食越来越受欢迎。虽然它们对健康有益,但也可能导致营养缺乏。认知障碍和精神健康障碍的经济负担很高。

目的

进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究纯素或素食饮食与认知和心理健康之间的关系。

数据来源

从创建到 2018 年 7 月,在 PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 Proquest 数据库中进行了检查。

研究选择

独立地由 2 位作者选择了关于纯素/素食饮食的原始观察性或干预性人体研究。

数据提取

原始均值和标准差用作连续结果,而事件数量用作分类结果。

结果

在 1249 篇出版物中,有 13 篇被纳入,共有 17809 人。饮食与抑郁评分、压力、幸福感或认知障碍的连续评分之间没有显著关联。素食者患抑郁症的风险更高(优势比=2.142;95%CI,1.105-4.148),焦虑评分更低(平均差异=-0.847;95%CI,-1.677 至-0.018)。异质性很大,因此亚组分析显示出许多差异。

结论

素食或纯素饮食与更高的抑郁风险和更低的焦虑评分相关,但其他结果没有差异。焦虑的亚组分析显示,焦虑风险更高,主要发生在 26 岁以下的参与者和质量较高的研究中。需要更多总体质量更好的研究来明确积极或消极的关联。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42018097204。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验