Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, California.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jul;17(7):845-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
The risks from potential exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and resource reallocation that has occurred to combat the pandemic, have altered the balance of benefits and harms that informed current (pre-COVID-19) guideline recommendations for lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. Consensus statements were developed to guide clinicians managing lung cancer screening programs and patients with lung nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic.
An expert panel of 24 members, including pulmonologists (n = 17), thoracic radiologists (n = 5), and thoracic surgeons (n = 2), was formed. The panel was provided with an overview of current evidence, summarized by recent guidelines related to lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. The panel was convened by video teleconference to discuss and then vote on statements related to 12 common clinical scenarios. A predefined threshold of 70% of panel members voting agree or strongly agree was used to determine if there was a consensus for each statement. Items that may influence decisions were listed as notes to be considered for each scenario.
Twelve statements related to baseline and annual lung cancer screening (n = 2), surveillance of a previously detected lung nodule (n = 5), evaluation of intermediate and high-risk lung nodules (n = 4), and management of clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 1) were developed and modified. All 12 statements were confirmed as consensus statements according to the voting results. The consensus statements provide guidance about situations in which it was believed to be appropriate to delay screening, defer surveillance imaging of lung nodules, and minimize nonurgent interventions during the evaluation of lung nodules and stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.
There was consensus that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is appropriate to defer enrollment in lung cancer screening and modify the evaluation of lung nodules due to the added risks from potential exposure and the need for resource reallocation. There are multiple local, regional, and patient-related factors that should be considered when applying these statements to individual patient care.
由于潜在感染 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的风险以及为抗击疫情而进行的资源重新配置,改变了当前(COVID-19 之前)肺癌筛查和肺结节评估指南建议的利弊平衡。为此制定了共识声明,以指导临床医生管理 COVID-19 大流行期间的肺癌筛查计划和肺结节患者。
成立了一个由 24 名成员组成的专家小组,包括肺科医生(n=17)、胸部放射科医生(n=5)和胸外科医生(n=2)。该小组获得了当前证据的概述,由最近与肺癌筛查和肺结节评估相关的指南进行了总结。通过视频电话会议召集专家组讨论,并对与 12 种常见临床情况相关的声明进行投票。如果专家组 70%的成员投票表示同意或强烈同意,则认为每个声明都达成了共识。列出了可能影响决策的项目作为每个情况的注释以供考虑。
制定并修改了与基线和年度肺癌筛查(n=2)、先前发现的肺结节监测(n=5)、中高危肺结节评估(n=4)和 I 期非小细胞肺癌(n=1)管理相关的 12 项声明。根据投票结果,所有 12 项声明均被确认为共识声明。这些共识声明为在 COVID-19 大流行期间,因潜在暴露风险增加和资源重新配置需要而适当延迟肺癌筛查、推迟肺结节监测成像以及最大限度减少肺结节和 I 期非小细胞肺癌评估中的非紧急干预提供了指导。
专家组一致认为,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,由于潜在感染风险和资源重新配置的需要,适当推迟肺癌筛查并修改肺结节评估是合理的。在将这些声明应用于个体患者护理时,应考虑多个当地、区域和患者相关因素。