• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI™ enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析与 EDI™ 酶联免疫吸附试验在人血浆中检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的比较。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.049. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Evaluation of the EDI enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in human plasma.评价 EDI 酶联免疫吸附法检测人血浆中 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 抗体。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.047. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).评估三种免疫测定法(Euroimmun 和 Abbott 的两种自动化免疫测定法以及 NG Biotech 的一种快速侧向流动免疫测定法)用于诊断 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
5
Head-to-Head Comparison of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.两种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测方法的直接比较
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1351-1357. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa125.
6
Temporal Course of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Positivity in Patients with COVID-19 following the First Clinical Presentation.首次临床症状出现后 COVID-19 患者 SARS-CoV-2 抗体阳性的时间过程。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 16;2020:9878453. doi: 10.1155/2020/9878453. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparison of four new commercial serologic assays for determination of SARS-CoV-2 IgG.四种新型商业血清学检测试剂盒用于 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 检测的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104394. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Evaluation of two automated and three rapid lateral flow immunoassays for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.评价两种自动化和三种快速侧向流动免疫测定法用于检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104413. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的抗体检测及动态特征。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1930-1934. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461.
10
Evaluations of the serological test in the diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections during the COVID-19 outbreak.新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染的血清学检测在 COVID-19 疫情期间的诊断评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;39(12):2271-2277. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03978-6. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A repeated cross-sectional analysis of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Manila, the Philippines after implementation of the national COVID-19 vaccination program.菲律宾马尼拉在实施国家新冠病毒疫苗接种计划后对新冠病毒血清流行率进行的重复横断面分析。
Trop Med Health. 2025 Jun 16;53(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00767-9.
2
Vitamin D Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections in the Borriana COVID-19 Cohort: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.博里亚纳新冠病毒感染队列中维生素D状态与新冠病毒再次感染的发生率:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 6;10(4):98. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10040098.
3
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
4
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the University hospital Heidelberg and correlation with SARS-CoV-2 incidence.海德堡大学医院中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体的流行情况及其与SARS-CoV-2发病率的相关性。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 13;10(22):e40282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40282. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
5
Underreporting of Cases in the COVID-19 Outbreak of Borriana (Spain) during Mass Gathering Events in March 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study.2020年3月西班牙博里亚纳大规模聚集活动期间新冠疫情病例报告不足情况:一项横断面研究
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;5(3):499-510. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030034.
6
A cross-sectional study of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Taiwan: implications for protection against the Omicron variants.台湾一家三级保健医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的横断面研究:对奥密克戎变异体保护作用的启示。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 27;24(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09411-z.
7
Immunogenicity Parameters of Cancer Patients Receiving the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 While Obtaining Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Cohort Evaluation.接受mRNA疫苗BNT162b2同时进行放疗的癌症患者的免疫原性参数:一项纵向队列评估
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;12(3):275. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12030275.
8
Detecting Respiratory Viruses Using a Portable NIR Spectrometer-A Preliminary Exploration with a Data Driven Approach.使用便携式近红外光谱仪检测呼吸道病毒 - 一种基于数据驱动方法的初步探索。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;24(1):308. doi: 10.3390/s24010308.
9
Association between sleep duration and antibody acquisition after mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.mRNA 疫苗接种后睡眠时长与 SARS-CoV-2 抗体获得的相关性。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 11;14:1242302. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1242302. eCollection 2023.
10
Sensitivities of a Rapid Test Versus an ELISA Kit for Detecting Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in Sera from an Egyptian Cohort.一种快速检测试验与 ELISA 试剂盒检测埃及队列血清中抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 的敏感性比较。
Curr Microbiol. 2023 Nov 30;81(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03473-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Connecting clusters of COVID-19: an epidemiological and serological investigation.连接 COVID-19 集群:一项流行病学和血清学调查。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):809-815. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30273-5. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
Assessment of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 with fully automated MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG and IgM chemiluminescence immunoassays.使用全自动 MAGLUMI 2019 - nCoV IgG 和 IgM 化学发光免疫分析法评估对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫反应。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1156-1159. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0473.
4
Analytical performances of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and antibody kinetics.用于 SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 的化学发光免疫分析的分析性能和抗体动力学。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1081-1088. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0443.
5
Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病 2019 患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2027-2034. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344.
6
Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.美国微生物学会2020年3月23日新型冠状病毒肺炎国际峰会报告:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型/新型冠状病毒肺炎诊断检测的价值
mBio. 2020 Mar 26;11(2):e00722-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00722-20.
7
Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).分析早期体液免疫反应以诊断新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
8
Molecular Diagnosis of a Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Causing an Outbreak of Pneumonia.新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)引起肺炎爆发的分子诊断。
Clin Chem. 2020 Apr 1;66(4):549-555. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa029.
9
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.

Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析与 EDI™ 酶联免疫吸附试验在人血浆中检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的比较。

Comparison of the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI™ enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz and Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.049. Epub 2020 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.049
PMID:32485155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261064/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Here, we report on a head-to-head comparison of the fully-automated Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.

METHODS

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured with the Elecsys® assay and the EDI ELISAs (IgM and IgG) in 64 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients with serial blood samples (n = 104) collected at different time points from symptom onset. Blood samples from 200 healthy blood donors and 256 intensive care unit (ICU) patients collected before the COVID-19 outbreak were also used.

RESULTS

In COVID-19 patients, the percentage of positive results rose with time from symptom onset, peaking to positivity rates after 15-22 days of 100% for the Elecsys® assay, of 94% for the EDI IgM-ELISA and of 100% for the EDI IgG ELISA. In the 104 blood samples, the agreement between positive/negative classifications of the Elecsys® assay and the EDI ELISAs (IgM or IgG) was 90%. The false positivity rates in the healthy blood donors and the ICU patients were < 1% for the Elecsys® assay and < 3% for the EDI ELISAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate a high sensitivity and specificity for the Elecsys® assay and an acceptable agreement with the EDI ELISAs.

摘要

背景

在这里,我们报告了 Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析与 EDI 酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在检测人血浆中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的头对头比较。

方法

使用 Elecsys® 分析和 EDI ELISA(IgM 和 IgG)检测 64 例经 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 确认的 COVID-19 患者的血清样本(n=104),这些患者的血液样本在不同时间点从发病开始采集。还使用了 200 名健康献血者和 256 名在 COVID-19 爆发前采集的重症监护病房(ICU)患者的血液样本。

结果

在 COVID-19 患者中,阳性结果的百分比随着从发病开始的时间而上升,在发病后 15-22 天达到高峰,Elecsys® 分析的阳性率为 100%,EDI IgM-ELISA 的阳性率为 94%,EDI IgG ELISA 的阳性率为 100%。在 104 个血样中,Elecsys® 分析与 EDI ELISA(IgM 或 IgG)的阳性/阴性分类之间的一致性为 90%。在健康献血者和 ICU 患者中,Elecsys® 分析的假阳性率<1%,EDI ELISA 的假阳性率<3%。

结论

我们的结果表明 Elecsys® 分析具有很高的敏感性和特异性,与 EDI ELISA 具有可接受的一致性。