Suppr超能文献

Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析与 EDI™ 酶联免疫吸附试验在人血浆中检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的比较。

Comparison of the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI™ enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz and Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.049. Epub 2020 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Here, we report on a head-to-head comparison of the fully-automated Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay with the EDI enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human plasma.

METHODS

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured with the Elecsys® assay and the EDI ELISAs (IgM and IgG) in 64 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients with serial blood samples (n = 104) collected at different time points from symptom onset. Blood samples from 200 healthy blood donors and 256 intensive care unit (ICU) patients collected before the COVID-19 outbreak were also used.

RESULTS

In COVID-19 patients, the percentage of positive results rose with time from symptom onset, peaking to positivity rates after 15-22 days of 100% for the Elecsys® assay, of 94% for the EDI IgM-ELISA and of 100% for the EDI IgG ELISA. In the 104 blood samples, the agreement between positive/negative classifications of the Elecsys® assay and the EDI ELISAs (IgM or IgG) was 90%. The false positivity rates in the healthy blood donors and the ICU patients were < 1% for the Elecsys® assay and < 3% for the EDI ELISAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate a high sensitivity and specificity for the Elecsys® assay and an acceptable agreement with the EDI ELISAs.

摘要

背景

在这里,我们报告了 Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析与 EDI 酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在检测人血浆中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的头对头比较。

方法

使用 Elecsys® 分析和 EDI ELISA(IgM 和 IgG)检测 64 例经 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 确认的 COVID-19 患者的血清样本(n=104),这些患者的血液样本在不同时间点从发病开始采集。还使用了 200 名健康献血者和 256 名在 COVID-19 爆发前采集的重症监护病房(ICU)患者的血液样本。

结果

在 COVID-19 患者中,阳性结果的百分比随着从发病开始的时间而上升,在发病后 15-22 天达到高峰,Elecsys® 分析的阳性率为 100%,EDI IgM-ELISA 的阳性率为 94%,EDI IgG ELISA 的阳性率为 100%。在 104 个血样中,Elecsys® 分析与 EDI ELISA(IgM 或 IgG)的阳性/阴性分类之间的一致性为 90%。在健康献血者和 ICU 患者中,Elecsys® 分析的假阳性率<1%,EDI ELISA 的假阳性率<3%。

结论

我们的结果表明 Elecsys® 分析具有很高的敏感性和特异性,与 EDI ELISA 具有可接受的一致性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验