Suppr超能文献

1型和2型糖尿病患者使用动态葡萄糖监测的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Castellana Marco, Parisi Claudia, Di Molfetta Sergio, Di Gioia Ludovico, Natalicchio Annalisa, Perrini Sebastio, Cignarelli Angelo, Laviola Luigi, Giorgino Francesco

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Puglia, Italy.

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Puglia, Italy

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001092.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is a factory-calibrated sensor-based technology for the measurement of interstitial glucose. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science were searched in July 2019. Twelve studies with a follow-up longer than 8 weeks, evaluating 2173 patients on prandial insulin, multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion were included. The following data were extracted: HbA1c, time in range, time above 180 mg/dL, time below 70 mg/dL, frequency of hypoglycemic events, number of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) measurements, total daily insulin dose, patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, and discontinuation rate. A comparison with SMBG was conducted.

RESULTS

FGM use was associated with a reduction in HbA1c (-0.26% (-3 mmol/mol); p=0.002) from baseline to the last available follow-up, which correlated with HbA1c levels at baseline (-0.4% (-4 mmol/mol) for each 1.0% (11 mmol/mol) of HbA1c above 7.2% (55 mmol/mol)). Also, a decrease in time below 70 mg/dL was found (-0.60 hours/day; p=0.04). Favorable findings in patient-reported outcomes and no device-related serious adverse events were reported. When compared with SMBG, FGM was characterized by no statistically different change in HbA1c (p=0.09), with lower number of SMBG measurements per day (-3.76 n/day; p<0.001) and risk of discontinuation (relative risk=0.42; p=0.001). A limited number of studies, with a heterogeneous design and usually with a short-term follow-up and without specific training, were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The present review provides evidence for the use of FGM as an effective strategy for the management of diabetes.

摘要

引言

动态血糖监测(FGM)是一种经过工厂校准的基于传感器的技术,用于测量组织间液葡萄糖。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估其在1型和2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

研究设计与方法

2019年7月检索了PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus和科学网。纳入了12项随访时间超过8周的研究,评估了2173例接受餐时胰岛素、每日多次胰岛素注射或持续皮下胰岛素输注的患者。提取了以下数据:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血糖达标时间、血糖高于180mg/dL的时间、血糖低于70mg/dL的时间、低血糖事件发生频率、血糖自我监测(SMBG)测量次数、每日胰岛素总剂量、患者报告的结局、不良事件和停药率。与SMBG进行了比较。

结果

从基线到最后一次可获得的随访,使用FGM与HbA1c降低0.26%(-3mmol/mol)相关(p=0.002),这与基线时的HbA1c水平相关(HbA1c高于7.2%(55mmol/mol)每增加1.0%(11mmol/mol),HbA1c降低0.4%(-4mmol/mol))。此外,还发现血糖低于70mg/dL的时间减少(-0.60小时/天;p=0.04)。报告了患者报告结局方面的有利结果,且未出现与设备相关的严重不良事件。与SMBG相比,FGM的特点是HbA1c变化无统计学差异(p=0.09),每天的SMBG测量次数较少(-3.76次/天;p<0.001),停药风险较低(相对风险=0.42;p=0.001)。发现的研究数量有限,设计各异,通常随访时间较短且未进行特定培训。

结论

本综述为使用FGM作为糖尿病管理的有效策略提供了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcba/7265013/05f677ef2e8b/bmjdrc-2019-001092f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验