• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州公共卫生机构结构与社会 distancing 控制措施实施的速度和程度之间的关联。 (注:这里“social distancing”直译为“社会距离”,在疫情语境下常指社交 distancing,即保持社交距离措施 )

Associations Between State Public Health Agency Structure and Pace and Extent of Implementation of Social Distancing Control Measures.

作者信息

Strickland Colten J, Karaye Ibraheem M, Horney Jennifer A

机构信息

University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(3):299-304. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001215.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001215
PMID:32487927
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between state public health agency governance and timing and extent of implementation of social distancing control measures during COVID-19 response.

DESIGN

State public health agencies were stratified by governance, and data on timing and extent of social distancing were collected from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Multinomial logistic regression and time-to-event analyses were conducted to quantify impacts of governance structure on timing and extent of social distancing.

SETTING

State health departments in the United States.

RESULTS

States operating under centralized public health governance structures enacted social distancing 4 days after decentralized states and had a 73% reduced likelihood of enacting a social distancing policy (hazard ratio = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.86).

CONCLUSION

State health department governance structure may have implications on timing and extent of social distancing control measures implemented during a public health emergency.

摘要

目的

评估州公共卫生机构治理与新冠疫情应对期间社会 distancing 控制措施实施的时间和程度之间的关联。

设计

州公共卫生机构按治理方式分层,从健康指标与评估研究所收集社会 distancing 的时间和程度数据。进行多项逻辑回归和事件发生时间分析,以量化治理结构对社会 distancing 的时间和程度的影响。

地点

美国各州卫生部门。

结果

在集中式公共卫生治理结构下运作的州比分散式州晚4天实施社会 distancing,且实施社会 distancing 政策的可能性降低了73%(风险比=0.27;95%可信区间,0.08至0.86)。

结论

州卫生部门的治理结构可能会对公共卫生紧急情况期间实施的社会 distancing 控制措施的时间和程度产生影响。

相似文献

1
Associations Between State Public Health Agency Structure and Pace and Extent of Implementation of Social Distancing Control Measures.州公共卫生机构结构与社会 distancing 控制措施实施的速度和程度之间的关联。 (注:这里“social distancing”直译为“社会距离”,在疫情语境下常指社交 distancing,即保持社交距离措施 )
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(3):299-304. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001215.
2
Asynchrony Between Individual and Government Actions Accounts for Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Communities.个体和政府行动之间的不同步导致了 COVID-19 对弱势群体社区的不成比例影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Social distancing measures in the fight against COVID-19 in Brazil: description and epidemiological analysis by state.巴西抗击 COVID-19 中的社交距离措施:按州描述和流行病学分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 18;36(9):e00185020. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00185020. eCollection 2020.
4
Policy Interventions, Social Distancing, and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the United States: A Retrospective State-level Analysis.政策干预、社交距离和美国的 SARS-CoV-2 传播:回顾性州级分析。
Am J Med Sci. 2021 May;361(5):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Impact of social distancing on early SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States.社交隔离对美国早期 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Sep;69(6):746-756. doi: 10.1111/zph.12909. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Mining Google and Apple mobility data: temporal anatomy for COVID-19 social distancing.挖掘谷歌和苹果的移动数据:用于 COVID-19 社交隔离的时间解剖学。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83441-4.
7
Effect of Timing of and Adherence to Social Distancing Measures on COVID-19 Burden in the United States : A Simulation Modeling Approach.社交距离措施的实施时机和遵守程度对美国 COVID-19 负担的影响:一种模拟建模方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):50-57. doi: 10.7326/M20-4096. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.大流行政治:新冠疫情时期的州级社会隔离应对措施的时机选择。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.
9
Public Compliance With Social Distancing Measures and SARS-CoV-2 Spread : A Quantitative Analysis of 5 States.公众对社交距离措施和 SARS-CoV-2 传播的遵从性:对 5 个州的定量分析。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jul-Aug;136(4):475-482. doi: 10.1177/00333549211011254. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
County-Level Social Distancing and Policy Impact in the United States: A Dynamical Systems Model.县级社会隔离与美国政策影响:动态系统模型。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 23;6(4):e23902. doi: 10.2196/23902.

引用本文的文献

1
A conceptual and computational framework for modeling the complex, adaptive dynamics of epidemics: The case of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Mexico.用于模拟流行病复杂适应性动态的概念和计算框架:以墨西哥的SARS-CoV-2大流行为例。
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323473. eCollection 2025.
2
Community Intervention System: COVID-19 Control in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.社区干预系统:中国内蒙古自治区的 COVID-19 控制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 6;18(23):12857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312857.
3
Strengthening policy coding methodologies to improve COVID-19 disease modeling and policy responses: a proposed coding framework and recommendations.
加强政策编码方法学以改进 COVID-19 疾病建模和政策应对:一个拟议的编码框架和建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec 8;20(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01174-w.