Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Centre hospitalier régional de Trois-Rivières, Université de Montréal, Trois-Rivières, QC.
Curr Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(2):113-116. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6041. Epub 2020 May 1.
Results of studies comparing subcutaneous (sc) with intravenous (iv) rituximab indicate that the two formulations are comparable in efficacy, but most patients and health care professionals prefer the sc route, commonly because of shorter chair time and reduced risk of infusion-related reactions. Recent Canadian data, including those from the scuba study reported here, support the results of earlier international studies showing a reduction in preparation and administration time with the sc formulation, lower cost of administration, and reduced drug wastage because of the fixed sc dosing. Given the significant time and cost savings of the sc formulation, that formulation is generally preferred over the iv formulation for the treatment of follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
比较皮下(sc)与静脉(iv)利妥昔单抗的研究结果表明,这两种制剂在疗效上相当,但大多数患者和医疗保健专业人员更喜欢 sc 途径,通常是因为 chair 时间更短,输注相关反应的风险降低。最近的加拿大数据,包括这里报告的 scuba 研究的数据,支持了早期国际研究的结果,表明 sc 制剂在准备和给药时间、管理成本降低以及由于固定 sc 剂量而减少药物浪费方面具有优势。鉴于 sc 制剂在时间和成本方面的显著节省,与 iv 制剂相比,该制剂通常更适合治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤、弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病。