• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯减压治疗腰椎管狭窄伴退变性腰椎滑脱症的结果:至少 5 年随访。

Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Gunpo, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(2):187-193. doi: 10.4055/cios19110. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.4055/cios19110
PMID:32489540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7237244/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment consisting of decompression and fusion is generally known to produce good clinical results for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, the clinical outcome of decompression alone, without fusion, remains unclear, and long-term follow-up results are scarce. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the 5-year clinical results of decompression only in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Among the patients diagnosed as having lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, 36 patients who underwent decompression without fusion and were followed up for minimum 5 years were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 7.2 years, and the mean age of patients was 63.2 years. Visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were investigated pre- and postoperatively, and also radiologic displacement and instability were measured. In addition, patients who needed fusion or redecompression at the decompression site postoperatively were also investigated.

RESULTS

VAS score and ODI improved from an average of 7.8 points and 57 points preoperatively, respectively, to 1.4 points and 19 points at 5 years postoperatively, respectively. The degree of radiologic displacement increased from an average of 5.1 mm preoperatively to 6.4 mm at the final follow-up. Radiological instability was detected in five patients. Two patients (9.5%) required fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up results revealed that satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained with decompression alone, without fusion, for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

摘要

背景

对于伴有退行性滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症,手术治疗包括减压和融合通常被认为能取得良好的临床效果。然而,单纯减压而不融合的临床效果尚不清楚,且长期随访结果也很少。本研究旨在回顾性分析单纯减压治疗伴有退行性滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症患者的 5 年临床结果。

方法

在诊断为伴有退行性滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症患者中,纳入了 36 例接受单纯减压而未融合且随访至少 5 年的患者。平均随访时间为 7.2 年,患者的平均年龄为 63.2 岁。术前和术后均调查了视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI),并测量了影像学位移和不稳定性。此外,还调查了术后在减压部位需要融合或再次减压的患者。

结果

VAS 评分和 ODI 分别从术前的平均 7.8 分和 57 分改善至术后 5 年的平均 1.4 分和 19 分。影像学位移程度从术前的平均 5.1 毫米增加到最终随访时的 6.4 毫米。发现 5 例存在影像学不稳定性。2 例患者(9.5%)需要融合。

结论

长期随访结果表明,对于伴有退行性滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症患者,单纯减压而不融合可获得满意的临床效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/e21ce324d968/cios-12-187-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/4b830d29a16b/cios-12-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/862bc80af1f0/cios-12-187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/e21ce324d968/cios-12-187-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/4b830d29a16b/cios-12-187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/862bc80af1f0/cios-12-187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a2/7237244/e21ce324d968/cios-12-187-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.单纯减压治疗腰椎管狭窄伴退变性腰椎滑脱症的结果:至少 5 年随访。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(2):187-193. doi: 10.4055/cios19110. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.减压与椎旁张力带:一种治疗腰椎管狭窄症和退变性腰椎滑脱症患者的新方法。
Spine J. 2015 Mar 2;15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.单纯减压治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):414-419. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4637-7. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.多节段腰椎管狭窄症合并单节段退行性腰椎滑脱的选择性减压与多节段减压融合术
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Feb 12;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1092-2.
5
Semi-Circumferential Decompression: Microsurgical Total en-bloc Ligamentum Flavectomy to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.半环形减压:显微外科整块黄韧带切除术治疗伴有Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症
Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;7(4):470-5. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.4.470. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.经单侧入路显微外科双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症,包括退行性腰椎滑脱症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Dec;9(6):554-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI.2008.8.08122.
7
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
8
Long-Term Outcome of Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Dynesys 动态稳定系统治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期疗效。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Nov 5;131(21):2537-2543. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.244107.
9
The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.单纯减压与附加融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较:一项来自挪威脊柱外科登记处的实用比较非劣效性观察性研究
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):404-413. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4683-1. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
10
Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.腰椎管狭窄症合并Ⅰ度退行性腰椎滑脱患者采用单侧入路显微外科双侧减压术后的临床疗效及影像学变化:至少3年随访结果
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Aug;29(7):268-71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827566a8.

引用本文的文献

1
Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature.单纯减压手术治疗腰椎退行性椎体滑脱后的再次手术率:文献系统综述
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jul 5;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00163. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的长期临床和影像学结果:10 年随访结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Apr 4;37(13):e105. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e105.
3
Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion for Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱症手术治疗中减压与减压融合的对比分析
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e1183-e1188. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.275. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Comparison of minimally invasive decompression and combined minimally invasive decompression and fusion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis with instability.退行性腰椎滑脱伴不稳患者的微创减压与微创减压联合融合的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Nov;57:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
Comparisons of direct costs, outcomes, and cost-utility of decompression surgery with fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
腰椎滑脱症患者单纯减压与减压融合术的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和Meta回归分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):71-80. doi: 10.14444/8179.
4
The Relationship between Adjacent Segment Pathology and Facet Joint Violation by Pedicle Screw after Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery.腰椎后路内固定术后相邻节段病变与椎弓根螺钉导致的小关节损伤之间的关系
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2911. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132911.
融合减压手术与单纯减压手术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的直接成本、治疗结果及成本效用比较
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Jul;23(4):653-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis.单纯减压与减压融合治疗腰椎退行性滑脱症的Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;111:e165-e177. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.单纯减压与附加融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较:一项来自挪威脊柱外科登记处的实用比较非劣效性观察性研究
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):404-413. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4683-1. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
7
Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.与退行性腰椎滑脱症减压融合相比,减压术后健康相关生活质量:一项加拿大多中心研究。
Can J Surg. 2014 Aug;57(4):E126-33. doi: 10.1503/cjs.032213.
8
Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis.腰椎退行性疾病融合手术操作指南更新。第 9 部分:伴有滑脱的狭窄性腰椎融合术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):54-61. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14274.
9
National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis.使用融合技术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的全国趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 1;39(19):1584-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000486.
10
Surgery in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications, outcomes and complications. A systematic review.腰椎退变性脊柱滑脱症的手术治疗:适应证、疗效和并发症。系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):945-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3144-3. Epub 2014 Jan 9.