• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布比卡因与利多卡因局部麻醉对单孔腹腔镜附件手术术后疼痛减轻的影响:倾向评分匹配法研究

Effect of bupivacaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia on postoperative pain reduction in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery using propensity score matching.

作者信息

Lee Ji Hyun, Cho Sang Hyun, Eoh Kyung Jin, Lee Jung-Yun, Nam Eun Ji, Kim Sunghoon, Kim Sang Wun, Kim Young Tae

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):363-369. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.363. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.363
PMID:32489982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231933/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The umbilicus is a single, painful incisional site on the abdomen during trans-umbilical single-port access laparoscopic surgery. Previously, we found that periumbilical lidocaine could reduce postoperative pain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lidocaine in reducing pain.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis in a study group (Bupivacaine group, 100 patients who received periumbilical infiltration of bupivacaine before their incisional site repair completion) and control group (Lidocaine group, 100 patients who received lidocaine at their incisional site repair completion). We compared postoperative pain based on the numerical rating scale (NRS) between propensity score-matched Bupivacaine-treated (n=50) and Lidocaine-treated (n=50) patients.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain scores based on the NRS were not significantly different between the 2 groups until 12 hours post-operation. However, 24 hours post-operation, the Bupivacaine group showed significantly lower pain than the Lidocaine group (24 hours, 1.76±1.07 vs. 2.53±1.11 NRS, <0.001; 48 hours, 0.84±0.85 vs. 2.16±0.85 NRS, <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Periumbilical infiltration of bupivacaine has a longer acting efficacy on reducing postoperative surgical pain than that of lidocaine.

摘要

目的

在经脐单孔腹腔镜手术中,脐部是腹部唯一的疼痛切口部位。此前,我们发现脐周利多卡因可减轻术后疼痛。本研究旨在比较布比卡因和利多卡因在减轻疼痛方面的疗效。

方法

我们对一个研究组(布比卡因组,100例在切口部位修复完成前接受脐周布比卡因浸润的患者)和对照组(利多卡因组,100例在切口部位修复完成时接受利多卡因的患者)进行了回顾性分析。我们比较了倾向得分匹配的布比卡因治疗组(n = 50)和利多卡因治疗组(n = 50)患者基于数字评分量表(NRS)的术后疼痛情况。

结果

两组术后基于NRS的疼痛评分在术后12小时内无显著差异。然而,术后24小时,布比卡因组的疼痛明显低于利多卡因组(24小时,NRS分别为1.76±1.07和2.53±1.11,<0.001;48小时,分别为0.84±0.85和2.16±0.85,<0.001)。

结论

脐周浸润布比卡因在减轻术后手术疼痛方面的作用时效比利多卡因更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7231933/15505d1de97c/ogs-63-363-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7231933/306c859c48a3/ogs-63-363-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7231933/15505d1de97c/ogs-63-363-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7231933/306c859c48a3/ogs-63-363-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d0/7231933/15505d1de97c/ogs-63-363-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of bupivacaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia on postoperative pain reduction in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery using propensity score matching.布比卡因与利多卡因局部麻醉对单孔腹腔镜附件手术术后疼痛减轻的影响:倾向评分匹配法研究
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):363-369. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.363. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Periumbilical infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine for postoperative pain reduction in single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery.利多卡因联合肾上腺素脐周浸润用于单孔腹腔镜附件手术术后镇痛
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;38(8):1135-1139. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1455079. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Evaluation of Targeted Bupivacaine, Bupivacaine-lidocaine-epinephrine, Dexamethasone, and Meloxicam for Reducing Acute Postoperative Pain in Cats Undergoing Routine Ovariohysterectomy.评估靶向布比卡因、布比卡因-利多卡因-肾上腺素、地塞米松和美洛昔康对接受常规卵巢子宫切除术的猫术后急性疼痛的缓解作用。
Top Companion Anim Med. 2021 Nov;45:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.tcam.2021.100564. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Feasibility study for a randomized clinical trial of bupivacaine, lidocaine with adrenaline, or placebo wound infiltration to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.布比卡因、利多卡因加肾上腺素或安慰剂用于减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的随机临床试验可行性研究。
BJS Open. 2019 Mar 26;3(4):453-460. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50159. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Comparation Among Opioid-Based, Low Opioid and Opioid Free Anesthesia in Colorectal Oncologic Surgery.基于阿片类药物、低阿片类药物和无阿片类药物麻醉在结直肠癌手术中的比较
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2023 Mar 29;44(1):117-126. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2023-0013. Print 2023 Mar 1.
6
Port site infiltration of local anesthetic after laparoendoscopic single site surgery for benign adnexal disease.良性附件疾病经腹腔镜单孔手术局部麻醉药的切口浸润
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017 Sep;60(5):455-461. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.5.455. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.牙周手术后布比卡因与利多卡因对疼痛及镇痛药物使用情况的比较。
J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1997;45(1):5-8.
8
[Effects of bupivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia in pediatric tonsillectomy patients].[布比卡因与利多卡因浸润对小儿扁桃体切除术后镇痛的影响]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;28(3):148-50.
9
Evaluation of intraperitoneal and incisional lidocaine or bupivacaine for analgesia following ovariohysterectomy in the dog.犬卵巢子宫切除术后腹腔内及切口局部使用利多卡因或布比卡因镇痛效果的评估。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2004 Jan;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2004.00137.x.
10
Comparison of Pain Control and Analgesic Consumption With or Without Infiltration of Bupivacaine at Port Sites after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口部位布比卡因浸润与否对疼痛控制和镇痛药物消耗的比较。
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Oct;32(4):1133-1139.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a propensity score matching study.单孔腹腔镜附件手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较分析:一项倾向评分匹配研究
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03604-7.
2
Can a Continuous Wound Infiltration System Replace Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management after a Single-Port Access Laparoscopy?连续伤口浸润系统能否替代静脉自控镇痛用于单孔腹腔镜术后疼痛管理?
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5718. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195718.
3
Efficacy of a continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic patients who underwent single-port access laparoscopy for adnexal disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of local anesthesia (with lidocaine vs bupivacaine) on cognitive function in patients undergoing elective cataract surgery.局部麻醉(利多卡因与布比卡因)对择期白内障手术患者认知功能的影响。
Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Dec 31;12:1-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S185367. eCollection 2019.
2
Periumbilical infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine for postoperative pain reduction in single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery.利多卡因联合肾上腺素脐周浸润用于单孔腹腔镜附件手术术后镇痛
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;38(8):1135-1139. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1455079. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in local anesthesia of the nasopharynx: A meta-analysis.
连续伤口浸润系统用于因附件疾病接受单孔腹腔镜手术的妇科患者术后疼痛管理的疗效。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;10:1199428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1199428. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparing surgical outcomes of da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi for endometrial cancer surgical staging in a propensity score-matched study.达芬奇 SP 和达芬奇 Xi 用于子宫内膜癌手术分期的手术结果比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37659-z.
5
Application Effect of Computer-Assisted Local Anesthesia in Patient Operation.计算机辅助局部麻醉在患者手术中的应用效果。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021 Nov 13;2021:8643867. doi: 10.1155/2021/8643867. eCollection 2021.
布比卡因与利多卡因用于鼻咽部局部麻醉的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016 Sep 30;30(5):176-180. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4357. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy.单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;133(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜疝修补术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1443-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ovarian mature cystic teratoma.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢成熟性囊性畸胎瘤的对比
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Jul;58(4):294-301. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.294. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统多孔腹腔镜手术治疗附件肿瘤的临床及手术效果比较
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 Sep;57(5):386-92. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.386. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
8
A comparison of lidocaine and bupivacaine digital nerve blocks on noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring in a randomized trial in volunteers.在志愿者的随机试验中比较利多卡因和布比卡因指神经阻滞对无创连续血红蛋白监测的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Apr;118(4):766-71. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000144.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy versus conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术:手术结果比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.布比卡因与利多卡因在牙科治疗中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Dent J. 2014 Feb;64(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/idj.12060. Epub 2013 Oct 11.