• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较腹腔镜下单纯性、根治性和供肾切除术的并发症。

Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):922-929. doi: 10.3906/sag-1910-120.

DOI:10.3906/sag-1910-120
PMID:32490652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379416/
Abstract

BACGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the complications of laparoscopic simple, radical and donor nephrectomies performed in a single center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on 392 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy in University of Health Sciences, Ankara Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2008 and January 30, 2019. Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. Postoperative complications were recorded and graded as per Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). All analyses were performed on SPSS v21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 49.13 ± 15.45 years. The frequency of comorbidities and ASA scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). Amount of bleeding was significantly lower in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) group compared to the other groups (P < 0.001). Classification of complications according to CDC showed that complications occurred in 17.01% (n = 25) of the LRN group, 7.02% (n = 12) of the laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN) group, and 2.70% (n = 2) of the LDN group. Length of stay in hospital was significantly higher in the LRN group than in the LSN group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the frequency of complications in LRN procedures was found to be higher than the LSN and LDN procedures. Patients with LRN may have more adverse health conditions before the operation. Considering the results of this study, variables such as patient and hospital characteristics, surgeon experience and skills should be evaluated in future studies. In addition, it is important to determine the frequency of complications using a standardized classification in order to enable correct interpretation of results.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在比较单中心施行的腹腔镜单纯性、根治性和供体肾切除术的并发症。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 30 日期间在土耳其安卡拉卫生科学大学高等专科培训与研究医院接受腹腔镜肾切除术的 392 例患者。记录了临床和实验室参数。根据 Clavien-Dindo 分类(CDC)记录术后并发症并进行分级。所有分析均在 SPSS v21.0(IBM 公司,纽约州阿蒙克)上进行。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 49.13 ± 15.45 岁。腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)组的合并症和 ASA 评分频率明显高于其他组(P < 0.001)。与其他组相比,腹腔镜供体肾切除术(LDN)组的出血量明显减少(P < 0.001)。根据 CDC 对并发症进行分类显示,LRN 组并发症发生率为 17.01%(n = 25),腹腔镜单纯性肾切除术(LSN)组为 7.02%(n = 12),LDN 组为 2.70%(n = 2)。LRN 组的住院时间明显长于 LSN 组(P < 0.001)。

结论

本研究发现,LRN 手术的并发症发生率高于 LSN 和 LDN 手术。LRN 患者在手术前可能有更多的不良健康状况。考虑到本研究的结果,在未来的研究中应评估患者和医院特征、外科医生经验和技能等变量。此外,使用标准化分类确定并发症的频率对于正确解释结果很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a90/7379416/234474ff1ada/turkjmedsci-50-922-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a90/7379416/234474ff1ada/turkjmedsci-50-922-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a90/7379416/234474ff1ada/turkjmedsci-50-922-fig001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy.比较腹腔镜下单纯性、根治性和供肾切除术的并发症。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):922-929. doi: 10.3906/sag-1910-120.
2
Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk.高麻醉风险患者中单纯腹腔镜、手辅助腹腔镜及开放根治性肾切除术的单中心比较
J Endourol. 2003 Apr;17(3):161-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903321618725.
3
Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾门肿瘤:围手术期特征及短期功能和肿瘤学结局比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183-1187. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study.腹腔镜单部位与传统腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗合并症增加和既往腹部手术的肾细胞癌患者:单中心回顾性研究的初步结果。
World J Urol. 2013 Feb;31(1):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-1005-z. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
5
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.部分腹腔镜肾切除术与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:T2 期肾癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):950-954. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0199. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies--is it time to use a standardized classification of complications?750 例连续腹腔镜供肾切除术的经验——是否到了使用并发症标准化分类的时候了?
J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
7
Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.腹腔镜与手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):873-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.024.
8
Implementation and learning of laproscopic donor nephrectomy by a non-transplant general surgeon with advanced laparoscopic skills.由一位具备先进腹腔镜技术的非移植普通外科医生实施和学习腹腔镜供肾切除术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Aug;4(3):127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00092.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
9
Radical renal surgery (laparoscopic and open) in octogenarians.80 岁以上老年人的根治性肾手术(腹腔镜和开放性)。
Surgeon. 2011 Jun;9(3):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
10
Fewer complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy as compared to the open procedure with the modified Clavien classification system--a retrospective analysis from southern China.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜肾切除术后并发症更少:基于改良Clavien分类系统的回顾性分析——来自中国南方的研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 31;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-242.

引用本文的文献

1
Not-so-simple nephrectomy: Comparative analysis of radical and simple nephrectomy in a high-volume tertiary referral center.不那么简单的肾切除术:在一家高容量的三级转诊中心对根治性肾切除术和单纯性肾切除术的比较分析。
Int J Urol. 2024 Feb;31(2):160-168. doi: 10.1111/iju.15330. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Is simple nephrectomy the right nomenclature? - Comparing simple and radical nephrectomy to find the answer.单纯肾切除术这个命名恰当吗?——通过比较单纯肾切除术和根治性肾切除术来寻找答案。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):1059-1062. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1014_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
3D-Printed Cold Preservation Device in Renal Autotransplantation for the Treatment of a Patient With Renal Artery Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
[Complications and mortality after radical nephrectomy in a low-volume hospital.].[低容量医院根治性肾切除术后的并发症与死亡率。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Sep;72(7):653-661.
2
Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists' experience: a survey-based national-study.ASA 身体状况分级与麻醉医师经验相关:一项基于调查的全国性研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):53-59. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00224. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
A retrospective analysis of complications of laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy using the Kocak's modification of Clavien-Dindo system.
用于肾动脉狭窄患者肾自体移植的3D打印冷保存装置
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jan 3;9:738434. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.738434. eCollection 2021.
使用科恰克改良的克莱维恩-迪诺系统对腹腔镜左肾供体切除术并发症的回顾性分析。
Indian J Urol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):133-139. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_111_17.
4
Evaluation of the complications in laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy; An experience of high volume centre.腹腔镜腹膜后根治性肾切除术并发症的评估;来自高手术量中心的经验。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Dec 31;89(4):266-271. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.4.266.
5
Influence of hospital volume on nephrectomy mortality and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis stratified by surgical type.医院手术量对肾切除术死亡率和并发症的影响:一项按手术类型分层的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 5;7(9):e016833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833.
6
Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel.泌尿外科欧洲协会指南特别小组对 Clavien-Dindo 分级系统的验证。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Deterioration in the renal function and risk of microalbuminuria after radical, simple and donor nephrectomy: A long-term outcome.根治性肾切除术、单纯性肾切除术和供体肾切除术后肾功能恶化及微量白蛋白尿风险:长期结果
Urol Ann. 2016 Apr-Jun;8(2):184-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.164854.
8
Impact of Obesity on Complications of Laparoscopic Simple or Radical Nephrectomy.肥胖对腹腔镜单纯性或根治性肾切除术并发症的影响。
Curr Urol. 2015 Sep;8(3):149-55. doi: 10.1159/000365707. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Evolution of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique and outcomes: a single-center experience with more than 1300 cases.腹腔镜供肾切除术技术的演变与结果:单中心1300余例经验
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.027.
10
Fewer complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy as compared to the open procedure with the modified Clavien classification system--a retrospective analysis from southern China.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜肾切除术后并发症更少:基于改良Clavien分类系统的回顾性分析——来自中国南方的研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul 31;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-242.