Dunsan Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Seoul Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420925519. doi: 10.1177/1534735420925519.
This study examined the effect of a portable low-frequency electrostimulation (ES) device on patients diagnosed with (CIPN) immediately after chemotherapy for breast cancer. A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. A total of 72 patients newly diagnosed with CIPN were enrolled and randomly placed into the ES (n = 36) or the sham ES group (SES; n = 36). Duloxetine or pregabalin was prescribed to all participants from the initial assessment. The devices for 14 days, at least twice a day, for at least 120 minutes. The primary outcomes were the overall intensities of the CIPN symptoms as assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included Total Neuropathy Score (TNS), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ), Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and Instrument on Pattern Identification and Evaluation for CIPN (IPIE-CIPN). No differences in NRS scores were found between the patients in the ES and the SES group ( = 0.267). Patients in both groups showed significantly reduced CIPN intensities (ES < .001; SES < .001). No significant differences between the groups were found in TNS, EORTC-QLQ, CIPN20, and FACT-B. The general symptoms of CIPN diagnosed as cold arthralgia showed significance only in the ES group ( = .006). Compared with a placebo, the effectiveness of the low-frequency ES device with pharmacological intervention was not significantly different, but a therapeutic effect was possible.
本研究考察了便携式低频电刺激(ES)设备对乳腺癌化疗后即刻诊断为慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIPN)患者的影响。这是一项单中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验。共纳入 72 例新诊断为 CIPN 的患者,并随机分为 ES 组(n = 36)或假 ES 组(SES;n = 36)。所有患者在初始评估时均被处方度洛西汀或普瑞巴林。所有患者均接受 14 天治疗,每天至少两次,每次至少 120 分钟。主要结局是使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估的 CIPN 症状总体强度。次要结局包括总神经病变评分(TNS)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ)、化疗诱导性周围神经病 20 项(CIPN20)、癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)和 CIPN 模式识别与评估工具(IPIE-CIPN)。ES 组和 SES 组患者的 NRS 评分无差异( = 0.267)。两组患者的 CIPN 强度均显著降低(ES <.001;SES <.001)。两组间 TNS、EORTC-QLQ、CIPN20 和 FACT-B 评分无显著差异。仅在 ES 组中,CIPN 的一般症状(冷性关节痛)具有统计学意义( =.006)。与安慰剂相比,低频 ES 设备与药物干预的疗效无显著差异,但可能具有治疗效果。