Li Jing, Wang Jing, Li Jia-Yu, Qian Sheng, Jia Rui-Xia, Wang Ying-Quan, Liang Jing-Hong, Xu Yong
Department of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, No.199 Ren Ai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215123, People's Republic of China.
Business School, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, 710128, People's Republic of China.
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02175-w.
A great number of studies have concentrated on the influence of socioeconomic status with health outcomes, but little on how socioeconomic status affects social relationship in adolescents' families, peers and schools. This study aimed to clarify more detailed information on the connection between social relationships and different dimensions of socioeconomic status.
A school-based cross-sectional study was performed by 13-18 adolescents enrolled in East China from September, 2018 to May, 2019, which recruited 6902 students from junior and senior high schools and used the stratified random sampling method. Parent-child relationship (cohesion, expressiveness, conflict), peer relationship (interpersonal relationship, communication and interaction, social emotion) and student-teacher relationship (intimacy, support, satisfaction, conflict) were investigated. Besides, objective socioeconomic status (parental education and occupation, assessed by the adolescent) and subjective socioeconomic status (self-evaluation of family social class) were measured. More detailed information was used to clarify the link between social relationships and different dimensions of socioeconomic status.
All five indicators of socioeconomic status were slightly positively correlated with the quality of social relationships (r ranged from 0.036 to 0.189, all p < 0.001), except that maternal education was not correlated with the conflict dimension of parent-child relationship. Standardized regression coefficients indicated that paternal education (β = 0.08) and occupation (β = 0.07) were the predictors of parent-child relationship. And peer relationship model revealed that the corresponding effect size was slightly stronger for subjective socioeconomic status (β = 0.10), whereas the maternal education had a slightly stronger correlation with student-teacher relationship (β = 0.07) relative to other indicators.
Adolescents with lower socioeconomic status had poorer social relationships compared to those with higher socioeconomic status. These findings have important public health implications for health policy makers to make sound decisions on resources allocation and services planning in improving adolescents' social relationships and promoting health outcomes.
大量研究聚焦于社会经济地位对健康结果的影响,但很少关注社会经济地位如何影响青少年家庭、同伴和学校中的社会关系。本研究旨在阐明社会关系与社会经济地位不同维度之间联系的更详细信息。
2018年9月至2019年5月,对华东地区13 - 18岁青少年开展了一项基于学校的横断面研究,采用分层随机抽样方法从初中和高中招募了6902名学生。调查了亲子关系(凝聚力、表达性、冲突)、同伴关系(人际关系、沟通与互动、社会情感)和师生关系(亲密程度、支持、满意度、冲突)。此外,测量了客观社会经济地位(由青少年评估的父母教育程度和职业)和主观社会经济地位(家庭社会阶层的自我评价)。利用更详细的信息来阐明社会关系与社会经济地位不同维度之间的联系。
社会经济地位的所有五个指标与社会关系质量均呈微弱正相关(r范围为0.036至0.189,均p < 0.001),但母亲教育程度与亲子关系的冲突维度无相关性。标准化回归系数表明,父亲教育程度(β = 0.08)和职业(β = 0.07)是亲子关系的预测因素。同伴关系模型显示,主观社会经济地位的相应效应大小略强(β = 0.10),而相对于其他指标,母亲教育程度与师生关系的相关性略强(β = 0.07)。
社会经济地位较低的青少年与社会经济地位较高的青少年相比,社会关系较差。这些发现对卫生政策制定者在改善青少年社会关系和促进健康结果方面进行资源分配和服务规划做出合理决策具有重要的公共卫生意义。