Suppr超能文献

用于评估系统性硬化症皮肤纤维化的抽吸装置Nimble的验证

Validation of the suction device Nimble for the assessment of skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis.

作者信息

Müller Bettina, Ruby Lisa, Jordan Suzana, Rominger Marga B, Mazza Edoardo, Distler Oliver

机构信息

Institute for Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 3;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02214-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Skin fibrosis is a main hallmark of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Clinical assessment is done semi-quantitatively using the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Objective measurements for quantifying skin fibrosis could complement the mRSS to achieve higher reproducibility. The aim of this study was to explore the potential of suction measurements to detect structural changes in the skin that are associated with skin fibrosis.

METHODS

This clinical trial included 30 SSc patients and 30 healthy volunteers (HC). We validated a novel suction device-the Nimble-to quantify skin stiffness in comparison to the Cutometer using the OMERACT filter.

RESULTS

A significant difference (p < 0.05) between the skin stiffness of HC and SSc patient groups was found for each location measured. The correlation between the measurements of forearm skin stiffness and the mRSS values was high for the Nimble (r = 0.82) and moderate for the Cutometer (r = 0.58). A ROC analysis showed good ability for the Nimble to distinguish between SSc patients with and without skin involvement (AUC = 0.82). Both suction devices provided excellent reliability in all measurements on HC and SSc patients and proved face validity and feasibility.

CONCLUSION

Suction devices assessing skin stiffness, such as the Nimble, show clear potential to objectively quantify skin fibrosis in SSc patients and might be promising outcome measures complementing established methods such as the mRSS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03644225, Registered 23 August 2018-Retrospectively registered, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

目的

皮肤纤维化是系统性硬化症(SSc)的主要标志。临床评估采用改良罗德南皮肤评分(mRSS)进行半定量。用于量化皮肤纤维化的客观测量方法可以补充mRSS,以实现更高的可重复性。本研究的目的是探索吸力测量在检测与皮肤纤维化相关的皮肤结构变化方面的潜力。

方法

这项临床试验纳入了30例SSc患者和30名健康志愿者(HC)。我们使用OMERACT过滤器,验证了一种新型吸力装置——Nimble,与Cutometer相比,用于量化皮肤硬度。

结果

在每个测量部位,HC组和SSc患者组的皮肤硬度存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。Nimble测量的前臂皮肤硬度与mRSS值之间的相关性较高(r = 0.82),Cutometer的相关性中等(r = 0.58)。ROC分析显示,Nimble能够很好地区分有皮肤受累和无皮肤受累的SSc患者(AUC = 0.82)。两种吸力装置在对HC和SSc患者的所有测量中都具有出色的可靠性,并证明了表面效度和可行性。

结论

评估皮肤硬度的吸力装置,如Nimble,在客观量化SSc患者皮肤纤维化方面显示出明显的潜力,可能是补充mRSS等既定方法的有前景的结局指标。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03644225,2018年8月23日注册——回顾性注册,http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f066/7268280/987b5e8fcf00/13075_2020_2214_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the suction device Nimble for the assessment of skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 3;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02214-y.
2
High-throughput quantitative histology in systemic sclerosis skin disease using computer vision.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Mar 14;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2127-0.
3
4
Performance of myotonometer in the assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;43(2):695-705. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06848-6. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1102-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Durometry for the assessment of skin disease in systemic sclerosis.
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug 15;55(4):603-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22093.

引用本文的文献

1
A Method to Evaluate Skin and Skin Substitute Mechanical Properties Using a Suction Device.
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2922:297-304. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4510-9_23.
2
Near-infrared spectroscopy-enabled electromechanical systems for fast mapping of biomechanics and subcutaneous diagnosis.
Sci Adv. 2024 Nov 15;10(46):eadq9358. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq9358. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
4
Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Blood Adv. 2024 Sep 10;8(17):4651-4657. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233.
6
A quantitative comparison of devices for in vivo biomechanical characterization of human skin.
Mech Soft Mater. 2023;5(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s42558-023-00053-w. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients.
Burns Trauma. 2021 Sep 30;9:tkab028. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab028. eCollection 2021.
8
Standardizing Dimensionless Cutometer Parameters to Determine Elasticity of Human Skin.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Jun;11(6):297-310. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0082. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.
Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
2
Changes in skin score in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis are associated with changes in global disease severity.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Feb 1;59(2):398-406. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez299.
4
An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1102-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
A novel ultra-light suction device for mechanical characterization of skin.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0201440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201440. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(suppl_5):v53-v66. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex202.
8
Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231.
9
Systemic sclerosis.
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1685-1699. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30933-9. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
RISE-SSc: Riociguat in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.
Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122 Suppl 1:S14-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验