• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学相干断层扫描诊断青光眼的准确性:系统评价概述。

Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

IRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;105(4):490-495. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316152. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316152
PMID:32493760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7876780/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the diagnostic accuracy (DTA) of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting glaucoma by systematically searching and appraising systematic reviews (SRs) on this issue.

METHODS

We searched a database of SRs in eyes and vision maintained by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States on the DTA of OCT for detecting glaucoma. Two authors working independently screened the records, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews checklist. We extracted quantitative DTA estimates as well as qualitative statements on their relevance to practice.

RESULTS

We included four SRs published between 2015 and 2018. These SRs included between 17 and 113 studies on OCT for glaucoma diagnosis. Two reviews were at low risk of bias and the other two had two to four domains at high or unclear risk of bias with concerns on applicability. The two reliable SRs reported the accuracy of average retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and found a sensitivity of 0.69 (0.63 to 0.73) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.83) and a specificity of 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) and 0.93 (0.92 to 0.95) in 57 and 50 studies, respectively. Only one review included a clear specification of the clinical pathway. Both reviews highlighted the limitations of primary DTA studies on this topic.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of published DTA reviews on OCT for diagnosing glaucoma was mixed. Two reliable SRs found moderate sensitivity at high specificity for average RNFL thickness in diagnosing manifest glaucoma. Our overview suggests that the methodological quality of both primary and secondary DTA research on glaucoma is in need of improvement.

摘要

目的

通过系统检索和评价有关光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测青光眼的诊断准确性(DTA)的系统评价(SR),评估 OCT 检测青光眼的诊断准确性。

方法

我们在由 Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States 维护的眼部和视力数据库中检索了关于 OCT 检测青光眼的 DTA 的 SR。两名作者独立筛选记录、提取数据,并使用系统评价偏倚风险清单评估偏倚风险。我们提取了定量 DTA 估计值以及关于其与实践相关性的定性陈述。

结果

我们纳入了 2015 年至 2018 年发表的 4 篇 SR。这些 SR 纳入了 17 至 113 项关于 OCT 诊断青光眼的研究。其中 2 篇 SR 的偏倚风险较低,另外 2 篇 SR 有 2 至 4 个领域存在高或不明确的偏倚风险,适用性存在问题。这 2 篇可靠的 SR 报告了平均视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的准确性,在 57 项和 50 项研究中分别发现了 0.69(0.63 至 0.73)和 0.78(0.74 至 0.83)的敏感性和 0.94(0.93 至 0.95)和 0.93(0.92 至 0.95)的特异性。只有一篇综述明确规定了临床路径。两篇综述都强调了关于这个主题的原始 DTA 研究的局限性。

结论

已发表的关于 OCT 诊断青光眼的 DTA 综述的质量参差不齐。两篇可靠的 SR 发现,在诊断显性青光眼时,平均 RNFL 厚度的敏感性较高,特异性较高。我们的综述表明,原发性和继发性 DTA 研究在青光眼方面的方法学质量均有待提高。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews.光学相干断层扫描诊断青光眼的准确性:系统评价概述。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;105(4):490-495. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316152. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma.用于诊断青光眼的视神经乳头和纤维层成像。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 30;2015(11):CD008803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008803.pub2.
3
Comparison of event-based analysis of glaucoma progression assessed subjectively on visual fields and retinal nerve fibre layer attenuation measured by optical coherence tomography.基于视野主观评估的青光眼进展事件分析与光学相干断层扫描测量的视网膜神经纤维层衰减的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;35(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-0028-4. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
4
Factors affecting the diagnostic performance of circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer measurement in glaucoma.影响青光眼周边视网膜神经纤维层测量诊断性能的因素。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;105(3):397-402. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315985. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Macular versus Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters for Diagnosing Manifest Glaucoma: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.黄斑与视网膜神经纤维层参数在诊断显性青光眼的应用:诊断准确性研究的系统评价。
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):939-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.041. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
6
Application of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspect eyes.光学相干断层扫描在青光眼可疑眼中的应用。
Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jan;95(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00654.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
7
Retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and retardance.青光眼的视网膜神经纤维层进展:视网膜神经纤维层厚度与延迟之间的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2493-2500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes.健康眼、青光眼可疑眼和青光眼眼中光学相干断层扫描血管造影的血管密度
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT451-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18944.
9
Effect of baseline test selection on glaucoma progression detection by optical coherence tomography-guided progression analysis.基线检查选择对光学相干断层扫描引导下的进展分析检测青光眼进展的影响。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105(6):783-788. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315715. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Optic nerve head morphology in primary open-angle glaucoma and nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.应用谱域光学相干断层扫描测量原发性开角型青光眼和非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变的视神经头形态。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;96(8):e1018-e1024. doi: 10.1111/aos.13804. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Fusion of Fundus and Optical Coherence Tomography Images.基于眼底图像与光学相干断层扫描图像融合的青光眼检测新型深度学习模型
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;25(14):4337. doi: 10.3390/s25144337.
2
Interocular retinal asymmetry and cognitive frailty: A prospective cohort study.双眼视网膜不对称与认知衰弱:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14437. doi: 10.1002/alz.14437. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Evaluation of the Effect of Duration on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Choroidal Thickness in Exfoliation Syndrome and Exfoliative Glaucoma.剥脱综合征和剥脱性青光眼中病程对视网膜神经纤维层厚度和脉络膜厚度影响的评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 14;13(2):314. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020314.
4
The Natural History of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in an Irish Population and Assessment for Prognostic Biomarkers.爱尔兰人群中Leber遗传性视神经病变的自然病史及预后生物标志物评估
Neuroophthalmology. 2022 Mar 2;46(3):159-170. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2022.2032761. eCollection 2022.
5
A deep dive into the latest European Glaucoma Society and Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society guidelines and their relevance to India.深入探讨最新的欧洲青光眼学会和亚太青光眼学会指南及其与印度的相关性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;70(1):24-35. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1762_21.
6
Enhanced Objective Detection of Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundle Defects in Glaucoma With a Novel Method for En Face OCT Slab Image Construction and Analysis.利用一种新的 OCT 切片图像构建和分析方法增强青光眼视网膜神经纤维束缺陷的客观检测。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 4;10(12):1. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.1.
7
A Simple Subjective Evaluation of Enface OCT Reflectance Images Distinguishes Glaucoma From Healthy Eyes.正视 OCT 反射图像的简单主观评估可区分青光眼与健康眼。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 May 3;10(6):31. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.6.31.
8
Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening.开角型青光眼的危险因素和青光眼筛查建议。
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul;118(Suppl 2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01378-5. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition.欧洲青光眼学会青光眼术语和指南,第 5 版。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105(Suppl 1):1-169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
2
Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions.干预性视网膜和玻璃体疾病系统评价评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1399-1405. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4016.
3
Reliability of the Evidence Addressing Treatment of Corneal Diseases: A Summary of Systematic Reviews.评估角膜疾病治疗方法的证据的可靠性:系统评价综述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):775-785. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1063.
4
Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.25万项系统评价和荟萃分析中的重复、复制与浪费
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Dec;11(12):e005212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005212.
5
Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.基于 PRISMA-DTA 报告准则的诊断性测试准确性系统评价报告的完整性。
Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(2):291-301. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.292987. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.识别和描述 2016 年美国眼科学会成人白内障首选实践指南的可靠证据。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):514-523. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0786.
7
Optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis: An evidence based meta-analysis.用于青光眼诊断的光学相干断层扫描:一项基于证据的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0190621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190621. eCollection 2018.
8
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.青光眼的诊断准确性研究报告仍不完整:应用 2015 年诊断准确性研究报告标准(STARD)。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189716. eCollection 2017.
9
Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies.针对同一主题的重叠网络荟萃分析:已发表研究调查。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1999-2008. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx138.
10
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews.关于屈光不正干预措施的系统评价质量可得到改善:系统评价综述
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0561-9.