Suppr超能文献

潜在的生物钟对神经保护的翻译失败的影响。

Potential circadian effects on translational failure for neuroprotection.

机构信息

Neuroprotection Research Laboratories, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7812):395-398. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2348-z. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Abstract

Neuroprotectant strategies that have worked in rodent models of stroke have failed to provide protection in clinical trials. Here we show that the opposite circadian cycles in nocturnal rodents versus diurnal humans may contribute to this failure in translation. We tested three independent neuroprotective approaches-normobaric hyperoxia, the free radical scavenger α-phenyl-butyl-tert-nitrone (αPBN), and the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonist MK801-in mouse and rat models of focal cerebral ischaemia. All three treatments reduced infarction in day-time (inactive phase) rodent models of stroke, but not in night-time (active phase) rodent models of stroke, which match the phase (active, day-time) during which most strokes occur in clinical trials. Laser-speckle imaging showed that the penumbra of cerebral ischaemia was narrower in the active-phase mouse model than in the inactive-phase model. The smaller penumbra was associated with a lower density of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL)-positive dying cells and reduced infarct growth from 12 to 72 h. When we induced circadian-like cycles in primary mouse neurons, deprivation of oxygen and glucose triggered a smaller release of glutamate and reactive oxygen species, as well as lower activation of apoptotic and necroptotic mediators, in 'active-phase' than in 'inactive-phase' rodent neurons. αPBN and MK801 reduced neuronal death only in 'inactive-phase' neurons. These findings suggest that the influence of circadian rhythm on neuroprotection must be considered for translational studies in stroke and central nervous system diseases.

摘要

在中风的啮齿动物模型中有效的神经保护策略在临床试验中未能提供保护。在这里,我们表明,夜间活动的啮齿动物与白天活动的人类的昼夜节律相反,这可能导致这种转化失败。我们测试了三种独立的神经保护方法-常压高氧、自由基清除剂 α-苯丁基-叔丁基硝酮(αPBN)和 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂 MK801-在局灶性脑缺血的小鼠和大鼠模型中。所有三种治疗方法都减少了白天(非活跃期)中风啮齿动物模型中的梗塞,但在夜间(活跃期)中风啮齿动物模型中没有,这与临床试验中发生的大多数中风的相匹配的阶段(活跃,白天)。激光散斑成像显示,在活跃期的小鼠模型中,缺血半影区比非活跃期模型更窄。较小的半影区与更多的末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶 dUTP 缺口末端标记(TUNEL)阳性死亡细胞密度降低以及从 12 小时到 72 小时的梗死生长减少有关。当我们在原代小鼠神经元中诱导类似昼夜节律的周期时,与非活跃期的啮齿动物神经元相比,缺氧和葡萄糖剥夺会导致谷氨酸和活性氧的释放减少,以及凋亡和坏死性介质的激活减少,在“活跃期”的神经元中。只有在“非活跃期”神经元中,αPBN 和 MK801 才会减少神经元死亡。这些发现表明,在中风和中枢神经系统疾病的转化研究中,必须考虑昼夜节律对神经保护的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Multicenter SPAN Trial of Fasudil in Ischemic Stroke.法舒地尔治疗缺血性卒中的多中心SPAN试验
Stroke. 2025 Aug;56(8):2306-2317. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050977. Epub 2025 May 27.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Medicine in the Fourth Dimension.第四维医学。
Cell Metab. 2019 Aug 6;30(2):238-250. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.019.
7
Cell Death Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration.神经退行性变的细胞死亡机制
Adv Neurobiol. 2017;15:403-425. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57193-5_16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验