Suppr超能文献

利用专家共识开发一种工具,以评估物理治疗师在进行气道吸引时的知识、技能和判断力。

Using Expert Consensus to Develop a Tool to Assess Physical Therapists' Knowledge, Skills, and Judgement in Performing Airway Suctioning.

作者信息

Miller Erin, Brooks Dina, Mori Brenda

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute.

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2020 Spring;72(2):137-146. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0101.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a tool to assess physical therapists' knowledge, skills, and judgement in performing airway suctioning with intubated and non-intubated adults. A modified Delphi methodology was used to develop the tool and to evaluate its sensibility (i.e., common-sense nature). Participants were experienced cardiorespiratory physical therapists who perform airway suctioning and physical therapists employed in academic positions related to cardiorespiratory physical therapy at Canadian universities. Round 1 focused on refining which items to include in the tool, Round 2 focused on finalizing the items, and Round 3 focused on evaluating a preliminary version of the tool. A total of 34 individuals participated in Round 1, 30 participated in Round 2, and 25 participated in Round 3. A literature review identified 11 relevant domains and 69 supporting competencies. In Round 1, consensus was achieved for all domains; however, it was borderline for the professionalism domain. Multiple participants suggested that it was redundant because it is a global requirement for all physical therapists. Consensus was also achieved for 64 of the 69 supporting competencies; however, it was borderline for 5 of these items, and 5 achieved no consensus. In Round 2, participants rated a series of recommendations related to items requiring further consideration, as well as 9 new items suggested by the participants in Round 1. In Round 3, the preliminary tool was found to be globally sensible, but concerns were expressed about the inclusion of redundant factors and the tool's length. The tool was revised, resulting in a tool with 4 domains, 6 sub-domains and 43 supporting competencies, as well as an item rating the individual's overall performance. The final-round sensibility questionnaire provided preliminary evidence of the tool's face and content validity. We will investigate the tool's measurement properties in a future study.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种工具,以评估物理治疗师在对插管和未插管的成年患者进行气道吸引时的知识、技能和判断力。采用改良的德尔菲法来开发该工具并评估其合理性(即常识性)。参与者为有经验的进行气道吸引的心肺物理治疗师以及加拿大大学中从事与心肺物理治疗相关学术职位的物理治疗师。第一轮聚焦于完善工具中应包含的项目,第二轮聚焦于确定项目,第三轮聚焦于评估工具的初步版本。共有34人参与第一轮,30人参与第二轮,25人参与第三轮。文献综述确定了11个相关领域和69项支持性能力。在第一轮中,所有领域都达成了共识;然而,专业精神领域的共识处于临界状态。多名参与者认为该领域多余,因为它是对所有物理治疗师的一项总体要求。69项支持性能力中的64项也达成了共识;然而,其中5项处于临界状态,5项未达成共识。在第二轮中,参与者对一系列与需要进一步考虑的项目相关的建议以及第一轮参与者提出的9项新项目进行了评分。在第三轮中,发现初步工具总体上是合理的,但有人对包含冗余因素和工具长度表示担忧。对工具进行了修订,最终形成了一个包含4个领域、6个子领域和43项支持性能力的工具,以及一个对个人整体表现进行评分的项目。最后一轮的合理性调查问卷为该工具的表面效度和内容效度提供了初步证据。我们将在未来的研究中调查该工具的测量属性。

相似文献

2
Development of a tool to assess core cardiorespiratory physiotherapy skills: a Delphi study.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1827467. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Assessing the Clinical Competence of Health Care Professionals Who Perform Airway Suctioning in Adults.
Respir Care. 2019 Jul;64(7):844-854. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06772. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Preliminary development and validation of a paediatric cardiopulmonary physiotherapy discharge tool.
Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):34-44. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-30. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
7
Minimum standards of clinical practice for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.
Phys Ther Res. 2020 Nov 25;24(1):52-68. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10060. eCollection 2021.
8
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Development of a Quality and Safety Competency Curriculum for Radiation Oncology Residency: An International Delphi Study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):428-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.031. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
10
Defining the Key Competencies in Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures: A Multispecialty Delphi Consensus Study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician's Commentary on Miller et al.
Physiother Can. 2020 Spring;72(2):147-148. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0101-cc.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Clinical Competence of Health Care Professionals Who Perform Airway Suctioning in Adults.
Respir Care. 2019 Jul;64(7):844-854. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06772. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review.
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1491-1498. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812.
4
Normal saline instillation before suctioning: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Aust Crit Care. 2017 Sep;30(5):260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
5
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research.
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
10
A primer on the validity of assessment instruments.
J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):119-20. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验