Kwan Lowell, Nishihara Kanako, Cheung Aaron, D'Amico Claire, Hart Alex, Keshwani Nadia, Mathur Sunita
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto.
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Physiother Can. 2020 Spring;72(2):149-157. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0105.
Panoramic ultrasound imaging (pUSI) is an extended field of view (FOV) imaging technique that enables visualization of larger muscles; however, it is not available in all ultrasound systems. Using an acoustic standoff pad that is compatible with any ultrasound system may be an alternative method to increase FOV, but it has not been used to evaluate limb muscles. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of using pUSI and an acoustic standoff pad to measure the limb muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA). A cross-sectional study was conducted. Using pUSI and an acoustic standoff pad, we obtained B-mode ultrasound images of the rectus femoris, biceps brachii, and lateral gastrocnemius muscles of 26 healthy participants on two occasions 7-10 days apart. The agreement between the two methods was determined using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Test-retest reliability was assessed using ICCs and standard error of measurement (SEM). The feasibility of acquiring and analyzing the images was evaluated using a Likert scale. The acoustic standoff pad and pUSI demonstrated strong agreement (ICC > 0.85); however, the mCSAs were different ( < 0.05). Test-retest reliability for each technique was high for all muscles (ICC > 0.85; SEM = 0.6-1.5 cm). Image acquisition was highly feasible, but there were some limitations in analyzing the images. pUSI and an acoustic standoff pad are two reliable techniques for measuring mCSA, but the measurements are not directly comparable. Future studies should evaluate the accuracy of the acoustic standoff pad compared with gold-standard methods.
全景超声成像(pUSI)是一种扩展视野(FOV)成像技术,能够可视化更大的肌肉;然而,并非所有超声系统都具备该功能。使用与任何超声系统兼容的声学隔离垫可能是增加视野的另一种方法,但尚未用于评估肢体肌肉。本研究的目的是评估使用pUSI和声学隔离垫测量肢体肌肉横截面积(mCSA)的可靠性和可行性。进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用pUSI和声学隔离垫,在26名健康参与者身上,相隔7 - 10天两次获取股直肌、肱二头肌和腓肠外侧肌的B型超声图像。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland - Altman图确定两种方法之间的一致性。使用ICC和测量标准误差(SEM)评估重测可靠性。使用李克特量表评估获取和分析图像的可行性。声学隔离垫和pUSI显示出高度一致性(ICC > 0.85);然而,mCSA不同(P < 0.05)。所有肌肉的每种技术重测可靠性都很高(ICC > 0.85;SEM = 0.6 - 1.5平方厘米)。图像采集非常可行,但在图像分析方面存在一些局限性。pUSI和声学隔离垫是测量mCSA的两种可靠技术,但测量结果不可直接比较。未来的研究应将声学隔离垫与金标准方法进行比较,评估其准确性。