Suzanne Bench, PhD, RGN, is Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, King's College London, England. She is now at the time of this work was a Professor, London South Bank University, and Deputy Director, Research, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, England. Annette Boaz, PhD, is Professor, Kingston and St. Georges Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, London, England. Alison O'Shea, BSc, is Research Assistant, Kingston and St. Georges Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, London, England.
Nurs Res. 2020 Sep/Oct;69(5):367-375. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000443.
Public and patient involvement in healthcare research is increasing, but the effect of involvement on individuals, service delivery, and health outcomes-particularly in specialist population groups like critical care-remains unclear, as does the best way to involve people who have experienced critical illness.
The aim of the study was to explore former patients' and family members' views and experiences of involvement in critical care research and/or quality improvement.
Using a qualitative methodology, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with seven former intensive care unit patients and three close family members across England. Data were analyzed using a standard process of inductive thematic analysis.
Four key themes were identified: making it happen, overcoming hurdles, it helps, and respect and value. Findings center on the need for flexibility, inclusivity, and transparency. They further highlight the particular challenges faced by critical illness survivors and their family members in relation to research involvement, the importance of individualized support and training, and the vital role that project leads have in making people feel valued and equal partners in the process.
This is the first study to explore patients' experiences of involvement in critical care research. Despite the small, homogenous sample, the study provides valuable and important data to guide future practice. It highlights the need to enable and support people to make informed choices at a time when they are ready to do so. It further highlights the importance of gatekeepers to avoid vulnerable people contributing before they are ready-a practice that could negatively affect their health status.
公众和患者越来越多地参与医疗保健研究,但参与对个人、服务提供和健康结果的影响——特别是在重症监护等专业人群中——仍然不清楚,参与经历过重症疾病的人的最佳方式也不清楚。
本研究旨在探讨前重症监护病房患者和家属对参与重症监护研究和/或质量改进的看法和经验。
使用定性方法,在英格兰各地对 7 名前重症监护病房患者和 3 名近亲进行了半结构化电话访谈。使用标准的归纳主题分析程序对数据进行分析。
确定了四个关键主题:使之发生、克服障碍、有所帮助和尊重与价值。研究结果集中在灵活性、包容性和透明度的必要性上。它们进一步强调了重症疾病幸存者及其家属在研究参与方面面临的特殊挑战,强调了个性化支持和培训的重要性,以及项目负责人在使人们感到被重视和成为过程中平等伙伴方面的重要作用。
这是第一项探讨患者参与重症监护研究经验的研究。尽管样本规模较小且同质,但该研究提供了有价值且重要的数据,以指导未来的实践。它强调了在人们准备好做出明智选择时,需要能够并支持他们这样做。它进一步强调了把关人的重要性,以避免脆弱的人在没有准备好的情况下做出贡献——这种做法可能会对他们的健康状况产生负面影响。